We try to encourage couples to be in control of
making decisions for their children rather than leaving the decisions up to a judge.
Not exact matches
In many situations, court
decisions are
made on the basis of what is» «fair and equitable» to each parent
rather than what is best
for the
child.
Jacobowitz, who wrote the resolution, said «this is not a matter of politics or even a policy debate;
rather, this is a matter of basic government function, an informed
decision -
making process
for our communities, and the right of our
children to a sound basic education.»
«
For example,» suggested Dr. Choshen - Hillel, «We recommend that parents and educators encourage
children, especially those who are seven years old or older, to
make resource allocation
decisions by themselves,
rather than have the adults
make these
decisions.
For instance,
rather than having the parent decide on who should get the bigger cookie, the
children should be asked to
make this
decision by themselves.
However, prior to engaging the 1decision programme, we were working with dated PSHE field materials which told
children what to think
rather than providing the space
for them to
make their own
decisions.
Rather than passively wait
for history to take its course, or to succumb before the inevitable shifts that come ahead, we want to inspire educators and the society in full to
make active
decisions and take whatever roads we need so as to guarantee that every
child in the world has the opportunity to thrive.
«
Decisions on the amount of time with teachers, in class and at school should always be
made based on the potential educational benefit
for children,
rather than on how much money can be saved.»
Rather, it's about parents
making personal
decisions for their
children.
Through his role as Chief Executive Officer of New Schools
for Chicago, Daniel Anello is creating a platform
for parents and students to
make school quality so resonant that
decision - makers are compelled to support education policy that prioritizes the interests of
children rather than the adults.
In JGE v The Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938, the Court of Appeal upheld a first instance
decision making the Catholic Church (or
rather its constituent dioceses and orders) vicariously liable
for its priests who commit
child abuse.
In an early childhood service it may seem simpler and quicker
for educators
rather than
children, to
make many of the day - to - day
decisions.
is a warning of what the consequence will be if the
child does not obey you,
rather than an opportunity
for the
child to
make a
decision.
In an early childhood service it may seem simpler and quicker
for staff,
rather than
children, to
make many of the day - to - day
decisions.
Fact: «Most men who fight
for custody or access do not want a larger role in the day - to - day caregiving, but
rather a larger role in
decision -
making related to their
children and ex-spouses» lives.
These issues may endure
for some time after the divorce and continue to be a contributing factor in poor
decision -
making abilities, problems in behavior and other issues, so it's important to address your
child's difficulties sooner
rather than later.
Mediation allows you and your divorcing spouse to
make agreements about what will happen to your property and your
children together,
rather than having a court
make those
decisions for you.
How do we create a shift from their negative engagement with
decision -
making to a positive engagement that helps parents help their
children —
rather than harming them, perhaps
for life.
Finally, having the withdrawal provision in place encourages the parties to slog through difficult conversations and issues (with the support of the collaborative professionals on the team)
rather than easily giving up and punting to a judge who does not know them or their
children to
make an important (perhaps life - changing)
decision for them.
For example, some think the sum total of a custody case is something called «the psychological best interests of the child» [12] which aside from not being the custody decision - making standard in any state of the United States, is itself an undefined concept; others have opined that they are «the child's voice» [13a] or the «eyes and ears» of the judge [13b]; and others behave as if rather than being just another witness in a case, they are tantamount to being the de facto judge (the court, by calling them in, presumably having admitted to incompetence beyond uttering administrative orders for their benefit at the parties» expense, and handling case minutia
For example, some think the sum total of a custody case is something called «the psychological best interests of the
child» [12] which aside from not being the custody
decision -
making standard in any state of the United States, is itself an undefined concept; others have opined that they are «the
child's voice» [13a] or the «eyes and ears» of the judge [13b]; and others behave as if
rather than being just another witness in a case, they are tantamount to being the de facto judge (the court, by calling them in, presumably having admitted to incompetence beyond uttering administrative orders
for their benefit at the parties» expense, and handling case minutia
for their benefit at the parties» expense, and handling case minutiae.)
Many claims
for joint custody by fathers are based on a desire to share in
decision -
making,
rather than a desire to share in the day - to - day caregiving of
children.