Sentences with phrase «making employment decisions»

And they're making themselves vulnerable to a racial discrimination lawsuit (or an appearance discrimination suit, in the small number of jurisdictions that prohibit making employment decisions on the basis of appearance).
Proforma Screening Solutions, a unit of the Lowers Risk Group, has published a new whitepaper that describes pitfalls and best practices for using social media background checks in making employment decisions.
We understand that every HR pro knows that the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) governs how you can use «consumer reports» (like background checks) in making employment decisions.
There is no doubt that the use of criminal background screening in making employment decisions is getting more technical and more complex.
Employers have a legal duty of care, which is an obligation of employers to adhere to a standard of reasonable care when making employment decisions.
An employer should not consider an arrest record that did not lead to conviction in making employment decisions
But they can be tricky to decipher as certain state and federal laws prohibit making employment decisions based on particular aspects of credit history.
They provide employers with information to use when making employment decisions, such as promotions, pay raises, and layoffs.
An employer should conduct and individualized analysis and dialogue in utilizing conviction records in making employment decisions
An employer should not consider an arrest record that did not lead to a conviction in making employment decisions
An employer should conduct an individualized analysis and dialogue in utilizing conviction records in making employment decisions
«Hiring for Your Firm: A Human Resources Guide for Interviewing and Making Employment Decisions» at OBA Enterprising Lawyer Series (November 18, 2016)
(For example, if you have had genetic testing and show the genetic marker for predisposition for breast cancer, your employer can not use that in making employment decisions.)
There are federal and state laws that restrict New Hampshire employers» ability to collect and consider genetic tests and history when making employment decisions.
«Making employment decisions based on the assumption that pregnancy somehow diminishes a woman's ability to perform her job is unacceptable,» EEOC Senior Trial Attorney Rosemary DiSavino said in a press release announcing the judgment.
An employer can not consider your personal attributes in making employment decisions, such as recruiting, hiring, firing, transferring, promoting, testing, training, pay, fringe benefits, retirement benefits, or disability modifications or coverage.
You expect management to consider your work ethic, positive attitude, experience, and tangible results when making employment decisions.
While federal law does not specifically prohibit discrimination based on criminal convictions or arrests, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued a policy statement indicating that an employer's use of criminal history information in making employment decisions may violate the federal prohibition against discrimination based on race or national origin.
The Museum prohibits making any employment decisions or basing any terms and conditions of employment on the basis of a person's race, creed, color, religion, sex, age, height, weight, national origin, ancestry, or ethnicity, sexual orientation, transgendered status or gender expression or identity, marital status, disability, political affiliation, military or veteran status or any other basis now or in the future protected by federal, state or local law, ordinance or regulation.
-- Nothing in this title shall be construed to encourage, prohibit, or authorize the conducting of drug testing for the illegal use of drugs by job applicants or employees or making employment decisions based on such test results.
Requires school districts to use a teacher's consecutive appraisals for more than one year, if available, in making employment decisions and developing career recommendations for the teacher.
State law requires that appraisal results be considered by districts when making employment decisions, including termination of contracts.
Combined with not requiring districts to use any evaluation system when making employment decisions, AB 934 treats all teachers as interchangeable widgets.
The lawsuit asserts that five «outdated statutes» prevent administrators from making employment decisions in students» interest.
Since these school boards aren't usually involved in the day - to - day management of employees, and rely on the recommendations and advice of superintendents, supervisors, and human resource employees in making employment decisions, most — if not all — school districts could be severely affected.
When making employment decisions, health care systems can feel confident in using IBCLC certification as a measure of excellence.
Whether dating Spitzer would in fact impact Smith's performance as a de Blasio communicator — and whether it is ethical to make employment decision on those grounds — is up for debate.
In this post, I examine in detail how Nevada's pension plan for teachers operates and show how it incentivizes teachers to make employment decisions around arbitrary points in their careers.
In his cross-examination, Marcellus McRae, took aim at Seymour's assertion that the district didn't use test scores to make employment decisions on teachers and that despite the district's innovative policies, achievement gaps between ethnic groups persisted.
Strauch - Nelson said «the new system won't change how the district makes employment decisions or compensation,» but it «will be used to tailor support for teachers and inform professional development.»
The suit asks that the state stop using the so - called «value - added» estimates to make employment decisions.
Also, the employers use credit history to help them make employment decisions.
My sense in observing the debate over the appropriate use of employee credit history is that there's a lack of information regarding what credit information employers use, when they collect it and the process that is used to make an employment decision based on credit history.
If you live in 1 of the 40 states including the District of Columbia that have no past or previous or pending laws about how employers use credit information to make employment decisions, then you could be subjected to the type of treatment outlined in the hypothetical story above.
If a student is unable to make an employment decision within the expected time period, the student is encouraged to discuss their challenges with the organization and negotiate for more time in the decision - making process.
He leads the firm's Big Data Initiative, which aims to use data to help clients make employment decisions and reduce the risk of legal disputes.
As established in the Missouri Human Rights Act, it is unlawful for employers to make employment decisions based on membership in a protected class.
Under GINA, employers may not use genetic information when they make employment decisions, such as hiring, firing, promotion, assignments, and compensation.
Using genetic information to make employment decisions (e.g. refusing to hire someone, refusing to promote an employee, demoting an employee, laying off an employee, paying an employee less, terminating an employee, etc..)
Your employer must not use genetic information to make any employment decisions as genetic information is not relevant to your abilities to perform a job.
Since your driving record is public, employers can request it and make employment decisions based on how responsibly you behave behind the wheel, especially if the job involves driving.
We are specialists who can help make employment decisions based on job history, current situation and what role is most suitable in the future enabling our candidates to reach their potential and chosen career path.
More generally, using online information to make employment decisions is covered by all the laws and regulations as other sorts of information are.
What legal ramifications could arise from relying on that uncertain information to make employment decisions
Subjects of consumer reports — including background checks — must be notified, in writing, that information about them will be used in making an employment decision and they must give written consent.
Before making an employment decision, you may want to gather perspective from another party (i.e. former boss, colleague, etc.) who has had professional experience with the candidate via reference -LSB-...]
Additionally, it puts the employer at risk of making an employment decision based upon incomplete or inaccurate information.
This white paper examines the issues of pre-decision and adverse notifications as required by the FCRA and provides a series of best practices to help employers avoid potential civil liability when using background checks to make employment decisions.
Before making an employment decision, you may want to gather perspective from another party who has had professional experience with the candidate (e.g. former boss, colleague, etc.) via reference check.
Proforma Screening Solutions, a unit of the Lowers Risk Group, has published a new whitepaper that describes how employers can use individualized assessments to make employment decisions based on the results of criminal background checks.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z