Others cherry - picked paragraphs out of context — reading Svenonius» rhetorical examples of past misdeeds as endorsement — and missed one of Svenonius» points: The dangers of
making false comparisons between the past and the present to excuse what we do in the future.
But keep spreading lies and
making false comparisons as it falls right into the Republican playbook.
In her letter on lab - grown meat, Ingrid Newkirk
makes a false comparison between eating meat and using tobacco, when she says that meat eaters, «like smokers trying to quit tobacco, find it very hard to give up the stuff» (24 September, p 39).
On June 5 at Resources for the Future, Holmstead did not
make the false comparison between EPA's estimated rise in electrical rates but reduction in utility bills, though he called a carbon tax «politically incorrect.»
Not exact matches
The deliberately
false comparisons you've
made?
The chairman of Yad Vashem, Jerusalem's Holocaust museum and memorial, criticized protesters for
making what he said was a «
false comparison between the reality today to the Holocaust.»
People
making lots of
false comparisons with Giroud who is an out and out lone centre forward — Mandzukic, Muller, Benzema, Higuain are suitable for
comparison.
That is when you start doing the same thing as the other side and using
false comparisons and senseless comments to
make a point.
And Dominik somehow maintains a paradoxical tone in which every scene is at once intensely heightened and utterly realistic — the stick - up, in particular,
makes armed - robbery scenes in most other movies look
false by
comparison, without sacrificing tension.
However, Jay P. Greene and Josh B. McGee, authors of the study, note that this is «
false reassurance,» as «America's elite suburban students are increasingly competing with students outside the U.S. for economic opportunities,»
making meaningful global
comparisons essential.
Do not fall prey to a
false comparison designed to
make a radical position appear mainstream.
Regarding eugenics, you forgot the overwhelming similarity that they were both widespread, media - friendly, commonly - believed «facts» that proved to be
false (whether or not Global Warming is
false is obviously debatable, but he's operating with that disclaimer when he
makes the
comparison, and thus it is necessary to operate under it when disputing his claims.)
Three years ago, he launched his defamation suit against me because he was outraged that CEI's Rand Simberg had
made a «knowingly
false comparison» between climate science and sexual molestation.
It is fairly middle of the road for US conservative belief (i.e. yes, it is
false, but there are some views that
make it seem reasonable by
comparison).
I work for a travel insurer who distributes product through several online sources and: * A traveler has the opportunity to read policy exclusions in the same way they would on a
comparison site * All our products offer a free look period — it's the law not a
comparison site selling advantage * We don't use
false advertising to sell — unfair claim to
make in such a broad way, especially when this article does just that.
We had a relatively small sample for the number of
comparisons we
made, which increases the likelihood of finding a
false significant result [41].
Individually significant coefficients were interpreted only if the equation in which they were estimated was significant as a whole in a multivariate test, an approach that minimizes the problem of
false positives due to multiple
comparisons while avoiding the problem of low power to detect true associations of moderate magnitude that is introduced by more conservative methods (eg, Bonferroni corrections).33 Model
comparisons were
made using the Akaike information criterion.34