Ex-Labour MP Jim Devine, who was jailed for 16 months for
making false expenses claims in 2011, was reported to have had a parliamentary pass that year.
The Commons Committee on Standards ordered the Culture Secretary to repay # 5,800 to cover over-claiming of mortgage expenses but cleared her of
making false expenses claims.
Not exact matches
In a paper appearing in the Journal of Business Ethics, she identifies three essential factors in a «fraud triangle» that
make otherwise ethical people justify stealing petty cash or inventory,
expensing things for personal use or adding
false credentials to their resumés: motivation, opportunity and rationalization.
Of course these are
false contradictions, but a case can be
made to support the observation that in the aftermath of Vatican II the Church was driven by competing factions, each emphasing an aspect of Christian formation at the
expense of others.
I fully indemnify, defend and hold harmless Car Throttle (and any third parties authorised by Car Throttle using or exploiting the Content), their respective officers, employees, successors, licensees and permitted assigns from and against: (a) any costs, claim, demand, action, damages, loss and / or
expense arising from actions brought by any third parties arising from any breach of any of the representations, warranties or agreements
made by you; (b) any claims of or respecting slander, libel, defamation, invasion of privacy or right of publicity,
false light, infringement of copyright or trademark, or violations of any other rights arising out of or relating to any use of the Content as authorised herein.
Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin's chief of staff doctored an email and
made false statements to create a pretext for taxpayers to cover
expenses for the secretary's wife on a 10 - day trip to Europe last summer, the agency's inspector general has...
It includes provisions for the creation of an Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority and
makes it a criminal offence to submit a
false expenses claim.
Technical Answer: «If a claim is
made or a suit is brought against an insured for damages because of bodily injury or property damage... we will pay up to our limit of liability for the damages for which the insured is legally liable... and provide a defense at our
expense by counsel of our choice even if the suit is groundless,
false, or fraudulent.»
What do you call someone who opens a blog post with a
false accusation, segues into an unfounded generalization, slams credible scientists without justification, cites research out of context, and picks apart an argument no one ever
made — all, apparently, to keep his fragile ideological worldview intact, even at the
expense of the global economy?
As a matter of general agreement any large company will usually cover most
expenses and seek to recover from the driver any payout they were arguably not required to
make (such as where you provided
false information); that is another (huge) question entirely, in which you say you are not interested here.