Sentences with phrase «making hypothetical»

The simulations are based on making hypothetical changes to information in your credit profile that may affect your credit score.

Sure, you both love French food, but this doesn't mean that you should be making hypothetical plans to visit Paris together in the fall when you've only been dating for two weeks.

The voter has to make a choice of preferences whilst unaware of the outcome, thus making a hypothetical decision about a choice that can not be foreseen exactly.

This reflects the fact that people aren't always good at making hypothetical decisions and don't invest as much effort into considering second and subsequent choices as their first choice.

Leipzig trying to make the hypothetical move as difficult as possible makes sense.

The researchers analyzed behavioral and neuroimaging data collected from 427 boys and girls (ages 9.3 - 24.3) who made hypothetical choices between receiving smaller amounts of money immediately or larger sums up to six months later.

This makes your hypothetical demo results much more difficult to interpret and sometimes impossible to trust.

The IPCC does not make predictions they make hypothetical projections.

You have already made hypothetical model results of temperature be replaced by empiric observations.

Not exact matches

To make the experience as authentic as possible, I «became» a hypothetical senior account executive named Johnny Smythe (our HR manager thought the name John Smith was too bland).

«If you had that hypothetical never - sleeps, infinite - capacity, perfect - memory chief of staff, we'd get a lot more leverage out of the investment we make in all these IT systems and software platforms.»

One year on from the EU referendum, it is difficult to tell whether this number is shaping up to be correct: too many firms have not made public announcements, numbers have been vague and, with the terms of Brexit unclear, there are too many hypotheticals.

The chart illustrates the performance of a hypothetical $ 10,000 investment made in the fund during the depicted time frame, compared to its benchmark index.

This hypothetical example assumes the following: (1) one $ 5,500 IRA contribution made on January 1, (2) an annual rate of return of 7 %, and (3) no taxes on any earnings within the IRA.

The hypothetical examples assume the following: one annual $ 5,500 or $ 6,500, IRA contribution made on January 1 of the first year, a 7 % annual rate of return, and no taxes on any earnings within the IRA.

Let's look at how a hypothetical portfolio made up of 70 % in stocks and 30 % in bonds would fair with a large stock market loss at different levels of bond returns:

But going back to your hypothetical question: if you cut back your consulting hours and put 11 hours into Uber instead, do you think you'd be making effectively the same hourly rate?

In the second scenario above, our hypothetical borrower enrolling in REPAYE with grad school debt would pay back more money than in any other repayment plan, and have only $ 4,033 in principal and interest forgiven after making 300 monthly payments.

«Charlie made me focus on the merits of a great business with tremendously growing earnings power - but only when you can be sure of it - not like Texas Instruments or Polaroid, where the earnings power was hypothetical.»

If a hypothetical investor began contributing and investing $ 5,500 to an IRA at age 25 and keep making the same annual contribution until age 65, you could potentially accumulate $ 703,119 — assuming a 5 % rate of return.

The Law of Conservation of Alpha seems to leave us no choice but to conclude that the active funds in our hypothetical system will simply underperform the passive fund by the amount of their fees — in the current case, 1 % — and that the underperformance will continue forever and ever, never being made up for.

Anyway, that is just a hypothetical scenario because no robot, even the most legit ones, can even come close to making you that amount of money, it is sometimes almost baffling to us how unbelievable the claims are that these scammers make.

Results achieved on the demo account are hypothetical and no representation is made that any account will or is likely to achieve actual profits or losses similar to those achieved in the demo account.

The world, as created by God, the author of all infomation, is 99.9999999999999 percent empty space, made solid by hypothetical, force - carrying massless particles.

What would be shocking however is if this alien race had an incredibly similar story to that found in the bible complete with a single god, a jesus, some miracles, some parables, etc.... It would be the similarity of religions between alien races in this hypothetical that would truely shock me and at least make me question if that would be a solid point of evidence for the religious.

When women routinely win Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry or medicine, when a woman becomes a world chess champion, when a woman conceives and develops a brand new computer chip that represents a significant advancement over quad cores, when a woman invents warp drive or phasers, when a woman solves an «insolvable» math problem, when a woman, while working with the Large Hadron Collider, discovers the now - hypothetical Higgs Boson to be an actual scalar subatomic particle, when a woman figures out how to pinpoint the exact location of an electron at any point in time, when a woman working for Merck or Pfizer develops a remedy for Alzheimer's disease, when a woman's baseball team can defeat the New York Yankees, when a woman can bench press six hundred pounds, run the 100 meter dash in under nine seconds or set a world record in the high jump, then the fairer sex will have made an advance or contribution unlike any it has made before.

Why aren't atheists ever swayed into belief by WLC's meanderings about his hypothetical «uncaused caused» (named god) which is made of nothing but poofed everything into existence from its nothingness?

How does Craig get from his hypothetical uncaused cause made of nothing to the bizarro 3 - in - 1 Christian god who becomes his own son and sends people to hell if they don't believe the right unbelievable things about him?

Thus while we can identify a concept of the church against which a dominant strand in recent theology has reacted, we can make only a hypothetical construction of what might have resulted had historical questions of institutional continuity been pursued.

I do not believe any of the proposed gods of mankind exist but I make no claim to know for certain that a hypothetical god or gods is impossible.

You don't know what theories are in a scientific context, you make an argument equivalent to «people can't take strides greater than ten feet, therefore it's impossible to run a marathon,» and you think that the lack of a full understanding about a particular hypothetical explanation is some kind of demonstration that science is an abject failure.

I made a comment about what you might do in a * hypothetical * situation related to an article that * you * posted and now don't seem to understand.

As for your seriously off base torture comparison, if we saw a drastic increase in violent crimes, and there was a public outcry for harsher punishments to try and serve as a deterrent, and the Bill was drafted, made open to the public, and the solid majority of the population didn't turn against it with protests, signatures, and contacting their representatives; maybe a torture law could make it (though it would never get past the Supreme Court as the Consttution is now, but we'll let that slide as a hypothetical).

In the hypothetical situation that either the mother or child will die, a decision has to be made as to which life will be saved.

The man claims intelligence and makes arguments no sane theologian of any sect would make, unless purely as hypothetical.

(The reader may want to refer to the parable in Luke 16:19 - 31 in which a reference is made to the hypothetical resurrection of Lazarus.

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, writing the lead opinion in a 5 - 4 decision in which several justices wrote separate concurrences and dissents, compared the Mojave Cross to a hypothetical highway memorial marking the death of a state trooper to make the point that such displays «need not be taken as a statement of governmental support for sectarian beliefs.»

But this hypothetical statement is interesting because Dostoevsky never has Ivan make it directly.

I was just making a point that we don't even need to use a hypothetical in this instance because I believe the reality of Jesus teaching produced the outcome Sabio was looking for in his hypothetical.

I guess the premis of the hypothetical made no sense to me.

That is not a really big hypothetical — people have to make that decision every day.

Thus Brightman distinguishes other selves (within which category he includes one's own physical make - up) from inferences about the past and future of one's own self because these inferences concern immediate experiences (either actual or hypothetical) of one's own self alone.

Some people make the mistake of looking at that word if and saying, «Well, true Christians can't really fall away, and so this is hypothetical.

this is hypothetical as i assume you'd want that clean flavor if you're bothering to make a ganache with water in the first place.

... I do not consider that the delineation of the market should be limited by reference to packaged groceries... Nor do I consider that it is appropriate to apply the hypothetical monopolist test to the margin made by Metcash on the supply of packaged groceries, so defined, rather than to the wholesale price charged by Metcash for the supply of packaged groceries or any other goods supplied by it to retailers.

NOT a hypothetical: «In this real case with an actual arrest and victim, let's make up the fact that she actually threatened him...»

Clearly, opinions are all over the board on this hypothetical bet, and neither oddsmaker had plans to make this an actual live wagering option.

In a wire to SPORTS ILLUSTRATED, Mr. J. G. Taylor Spink, publisher of The Sporting News, said that in Admiral Gallery's hypothetical case,» [I] believe umpires could invoke power given them under 9.01 (c) and rule double play because of deliberate interference and making travesty of game.»

A forensic assessment of the filmed recordings by father and son team (Hypothetical Premier League) of every match played in the Premiership and the critical decisions made by referees shows that Arsenal would have finished top of the League (2 points more than they got) and Leicester should have been 2nd (9 points less than they got)-- if the use of video evidence had been used to review important decisions.

The Hypothetical Premier League based on how the League would look with the use of video technology to check key referee decisions — makes us top of the League and we came top of the Fair Play League too — which is great but unfortunately in the real world where it really matters — in the real Premier League — we came second — 10 points behind Leicester.