Sentences with phrase «making kind of questions»

And I'm not just talking about baby - making kind of questions.

Not exact matches

And if you have any questions as to why that is, you have an obligation to inquire about what kind of contributions the CC» er hopes you can make.

I was talking to someone earlier today, and said I'm getting clients asking to report on my recent trip to Asia, and one of the questions is what's the catalyst to make the market go up — that kind of magic - bullet question.

One question that flows from this is what kinds of changes the young Murdochs might want to make at Fox News.

As artificial intelligence makes bots more capable, and as companies that use Slack integrate it more and more into their other software systems, he says, «you could ask a bot the kind of question you would ask a really competent chief of staff who had the ability to read every single message in every single channel,» he says.

«Any argument they make for keeping that in would result in the same kinds of legal challenges presented by Section 3 (c), which poses the question of, «Why have people from these countries been deemed more dangerous than others?»»

And then there's the question of how a not - for - profit foundation like Mozilla can even consider these kinds of commercial deals, given the higher public disclosure requirements for nonprofits, not to mention the restrictions on money - making activities that accompany the favorable tax status.

E-commerce providers often report that live chat software enables them to address the kinds of particular questions that aren't common enough to warrant an answer in an FAQ section but that can make the difference in closing a sale.

Try to remember the kinds of questions they ask, how they follow up on the other person's answers, and even how they make use of silence.

«This kind of single - chute question,» says Cialdini, «significantly increases the percentage of people who brand themselves as adventurous,» which momentarily makes them «highly vulnerable to aligned requests» — such as your pitch.

«The Ambassador's team made it clear that he would want some kind of response on the last round of foreign policy questions.

Find out what kind of questions prospective customers are asking before they make purchasing decisions so you can provide relevant information to help them take action.

I want to ask kind of a follow - up to one of John's questions here just to make sure I understood it, too.

If you're planning for retirement and make the mistake of scrolling through any finance section in a slow news week, you have to ask yourself: what kind of questions are they asking to produce breathless headlines like these?Half of Canadians don't think they'll be...

Asking these kinds of questions will help you realize the value of this budget and make it easier to pay off these expenses in the near future.

How does he feel entitled to make any claim to be a better Catholic than Santorum (for that is what he's implicitly claiming) on questions that the church rightly leaves to the prudential judgment of voters and public officials, within broad boundaries, when in the next breath he confesses his complete failure to be any kind of Catholic at all on a question on which the church speaks with categorical moral authority?

@CP: before the age of 24 I buried my Mom and 2 children... tragedy didn't make me believe then and it certainly won't make me believe now... if anything those tragedies made me question what kind of an evil monster god really is if he allows 3 innocent people to die horrible deaths (my Mom was an avid believer and went to her grave believing she was going to be with god... it was a comfort for her and eased her mind... I just don't see it as a necessity)

I remember getting real cross with my little sister when she told me that she went out to see the movie The Exorcism of Emily Rose, but when she started asking me questions about God and all that, I was kind of thinking, «You know Olga, maybe this is a good thing that Hollywood is spending some money on making horror movies.»

Whether it is changing text books to teach religion as a «science,» making laws that prohibit stem - cell research which would without question help those in need, to stopping of any kind of gay rights, trying to put religion (christianity) into schools, a woman's right to choose, etc, etc...

Then when someone challenges them with one of these kinds of questions you make up some theory to address it.

Typically this process leads to a characterization of God as a being so advanced, powerful, immortal, and not subject to the laws of time, matter, and space that his followers can make up any excuse they choose to address questions, since nothing about their god (or gods) can be subjected to any kind of objective verification or scrutiny, just like everything else in the religion.

The point that I was making though, which apparently God failed to help you grasp, is not that Christians don't have answers for these kinds of questions.

Maybe those words, that question, actually came right then because I was feeling how the children he and I had made together, with the kind hand of the Divine, they were moulting out of their childhoods all around us.

As noted in the introduction, I am also making another, different kind of assumption that readers will make use of these questions in whatever way seems most helpful.

If the non-believer who is proud, fully desiring, and un-receptive of practicing their sin of homosexuality and they love being around the believer then that would make me question what's wrong with that believer because the scripture says; «Indeed, all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will be persecuted — 2 Timothy 3:12, No proudly practicing sinner of any kind will stay with a believer very long just ask Liz

In order to make some advance in the obscurity and complexity of the question, and to provide a guiding line for our reflections, a distinction must first be drawn, even though we can not but realize that the two poles of the distinction are linked by manifold connections of the most complicated kind.

The latter is a tangled problem at best, but it is clear that among the important founders of the process perspective — specifically I mean James, Peirce, Bergson, Whitehead, Dewey, and Hartshorne — it is Hartshorne's work which comes closest to being a kind of personalism.1 Whitehead explicitly sets aside the personalist perspective in Religion in the Making, considering its claims beyond the possibility of being established.2 On the other side, a number of personalists have been sympathetic to process thought, and Brightman is surely principal among them.3 Here I will not investigate the question of whether personalism in general, or even the idealistic type, is reconcilable with process thought.

These are the kinds of questions that make us wonder if all this God stuff is really true.

At a press event for Perry's newest film Madea's Big Happy Family, which came out on Friday, Perry addressed Spike Lee's criticisms in a most unexpected fashion — by railing at me for a question I was making about a completely different kind of potential backlash.

And the response by complementarians to these questions as posed in A Year of Biblical Womanhood, with a few exceptions (Mary Kassian has been very kind to engage), has essentially been: «Look at this silly woman who thinks you have to make a sign and literally praise your husband at the city gate!

The kind of inquiry that leads to the paradox of creativity springs from the question: What source makes creativity possible?

You can not respond to them using that kind of reasoning any more than they can coherently use these tools, which are not designed to address questions of faith, to make arguments that would shake the faith of someone who has faith.

They face the same kind of question on the making of our laws, and a wave of litigation running even beyond the wit of the cleverest judge.

In literally thousands of local congregations a minister or a lay leader has raised the question of why a disabled member of the congregation has to go elsewhere: «Of course we must make it possible for him [or her] to attend here,» they say, and then they intentionally work at overcoming two kinds of barriers — architectural and attitudinaof local congregations a minister or a lay leader has raised the question of why a disabled member of the congregation has to go elsewhere: «Of course we must make it possible for him [or her] to attend here,» they say, and then they intentionally work at overcoming two kinds of barriers — architectural and attitudinaof why a disabled member of the congregation has to go elsewhere: «Of course we must make it possible for him [or her] to attend here,» they say, and then they intentionally work at overcoming two kinds of barriers — architectural and attitudinaof the congregation has to go elsewhere: «Of course we must make it possible for him [or her] to attend here,» they say, and then they intentionally work at overcoming two kinds of barriers — architectural and attitudinaOf course we must make it possible for him [or her] to attend here,» they say, and then they intentionally work at overcoming two kinds of barriers — architectural and attitudinaof barriers — architectural and attitudinal,

But if these questions intrigue you, if they get under your skin and keep you up at night, if they challenge your faith and make you want to learn more, then you will find fodder for the imagination and companionship for the journey in A New Kind of Christianity: Ten Questions That Are Transforming tquestions intrigue you, if they get under your skin and keep you up at night, if they challenge your faith and make you want to learn more, then you will find fodder for the imagination and companionship for the journey in A New Kind of Christianity: Ten Questions That Are Transforming tQuestions That Are Transforming the Faith.

And the choice we make, deliberatively and democratically, will do much to answer two questions: What kind of a people are we?

When a counselor raised the question of possible overprotection, one wife responded, «After all, if Frank had pneumonia, I would make all kinds of allowances for his actions.»

In the present book I have spoken only incidentally of the «case» for prayer; my purpose here is to make suggestions about the actual practice of prayer, including the question of its effectiveness, the various kinds of praying in which we may engage, the significant exercise of private prayer and of public prayer, the way in which the Lord's Supper (or Holy Communion or Eucharist call it what you will) sums up all our praying, and finally the point of prayer in the total context of Christian faith itself.

The kinds of responses which are made to this question on the part of Christian homosexuals will have great importance for all of us.

Hello, I'd like to ask a bit strange question — in my country, when we make pancakes, we kind of fry them on a pan, so how can I do them in a oven?

I make and love a lot of your recipes, and I have a kind of general question for you.

Perhaps this is a silly question but I've never made bread of any kind before, so I apologize in advance.

But in answer to your question, we would definitely make paleo pizza bowls and all kinds of breakfast bowls.

I really appreciate this kind of feedback, really makes me keep on doing more:) Let me know if you have any questions for the other recipes you will be trying and hope you will share my blog with your friends:)

Question: I'm planning on making these for Christmas Eve, both as wontons and egg rolls - I need the kind of food that sits on a small plate and can be eaten with one hand while chatting - and I was curious, do you think I could make these in advance and freeze them, so on xmas eve I only need to toss them in the oven, like the frozen non-GF ones from the supermarket?

Quick question on this one though - I made it in a food processor and added a little extra cacao, and suddenly it seized up on me and became thick and kind of gritty, with the coconut oil separating from the mixture... what did I do wrong??? Granted, it still tasted pretty darn delish as the clumps were basically honey and cacao, but still...??? Thanks!

(If you have questions on how to make these kinds of changes — let me know and I would be happy to help!)

Someone already asked a similar kind of a question, but just to make sure, I'll ask again..

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

«So I don't think it's justified to give us these kind of shit questions and making up a story out of nothing, if we are just racing and we are full of adrenaline and sometime we say these things.