Any attempt at preventive war will harm U.S. interests,
making nuclear conflict profoundly more likely.
Not exact matches
While the attack Thursday was the first of its kind by the US, Lowther said the bomb was «not even close to being a
nuclear weapon» and he would «not
make the argument that it's a symbol of escalation» in the
conflict in Afghanistan.
Now you have a decision to
make - use
nuclear weapons, likely escalating the
conflict to a full - out
nuclear war, i.e. Game Over, Earth - or allow them to take one village.
President Donald Trump's threat to unleash «fire and fury» against North Korea sent a shudder through Asia, raising alarm among allies and adversaries and, to some observers,
making the possibility of military
conflict over the North's
nuclear program seem more real.
Even as Iran's
nuclear program raises the likelihood of yet another
conflict in the Middle East, the bigger threat is a potential food crisis in the
making, says Lester Brown, founder of the Earth Policy Institute.
Today, in times of resource scarcity, global warming and impending
nuclear conflict, this claim is being boldly asserted once again — in the form, however, of a private - sector undertaking driven primarily by US tech billionaires from the new space industry, not least — as they claim — in order to secure the survival of mankind against home -
made planetary collapse.
But other groups advocate for
nuclear and they have interest on the ideological level and the financial level on these issues and you can't
make generalizations and they are complicated and there are situations where there might be a clear
conflict of interest.