Sentences with phrase «making other attacks»

There are a few other ways to attack, such as a charge attack or a ranged attack, but mashing the attack button for melee moves kills foes in three hits, making other attacks unnecessary to use in most instances.

Not exact matches

Perry has repeatedly said that storing fuel on site makes coal and nuclear plants less prone to shutdowns than other power generators in the event of disasters and attacks.

Other companies are making financial sacrifices to help those affected by the attacks.

You're contributing to the continuation of the issue, and you're making it more likely that others will suffer the same kind of attack.

«We have made visible actions in deploying US forces as part of the coalition in and around Manbij to reassure and deter — that's to deter parties from attacking any other parties other than ISIS itself,» he said, using another acronym for IS.

The challenger would have to argue that Trump has made the country a laughingstock that doesn't get respect anymore, Trump does not seem to win, Trump seems to dither with indecision when faced with difficult national security choices, Trump lets other countries attack America without responding, and Trump ties himself in rhetorical knots to avoid naming obvious enemies.

Passionate followers — quick to judge the other side as stupid or incorrigible — then pursue heated discourse and hurl ad hominem attacks, making calm and rational discussion all but impossible.

A pre-installed program on some newly purchased Dell laptops that can only be removed manually by consumers makes them vulnerable to cyber intrusions that may allow hackers to read encrypted messages and redirect browser traffic to spoofs of real websites such as Google or those belonging to a bank, among other attacks.

But also make sure you're prepared to take the heat when others attack — because they will.

It did, however, make some decisions in favor of usability that some security experts thought compromised the system to a few kinds of attack that other researchers believed were unlikely.

According to a PBS Frontline report, a battery of psychological disorders are attached to solitary confinement, including hallucinations, panic attacks, paranoia and loss of behavioral control, all of which make it difficult for prisoners to readjust to life among other people.

And those other workers, by the way, were already unionized, making it a sneak attack not just on the employer, but a rival union as well.

Mobile phone carriers have said they are taking steps to head off the attacks by making it possible to add more complex personal identification numbers, or PINs, to accounts, among other steps.

This gives them certain advantages over centralized exchange platforms: they do not collect information about users, their accounts, or transactions and they do not aggregate trade volume, which makes them far less prone to hacker attacks; they can not be easily seized or shut down due to government censorship or other external factors.

Well, I picked my sons up from practice, come back here to this site, and still find some of the most pathetic, name - calling, personal ad - hominem attacks on others I've seen in awhile... It makes me think that I waste time being on here with some of you.

After making that first record, we had no confidence in our ability to make great artistic decisions, and less confidence in our ability to refrain from attacking each other with blunt objects in the studio.

dalahast / AE, please cease your childish ad hominems, and try for a change to find the courage to reply without making personal attacks on me and others here.

Or how to not make 1 post without personal attacks on others?

As a Christian, I find that I make the same mistakes atheists make; I resent people typecasting me just as others do, I get my feelings hurt when people bash me for no reason, I get angry when I see selfish, mean people attacking others needlessly, and I hate war, death, and cruelty where ever it is found.

There is evidence of others, like Colin, making personal attacks, too, toward me in that same thread.

Others: Having been sexually abused by a man in our church myself at the age of 12, and having had to endure the consequences for the last 42 years, and having been the target of several righteous / religious attacks over the last few years, the abused have a right to speak and be heard even if it makes you uncomfortable.

And these two have continued to attack me via other family members, making sure to never have their own names attached to the hate mails I have continued to receive.

I really feel that the organization is going about this in the wrong way... I don't understand why they are trying to make atheism into a religion... if they want to have a billboard then let them have a billboard but it should be more passive instead of attacking other religions... live and let live

Whatever it is the Christian men are doing to abuse their women and families and make the women attack each other is very rotten, too.

As the men were «making their hearts merry» with food and drink, others from the city came and demanded that the old man give up his guest so that they might homosexually attack him.

Stop using Bobs name to attack him, I have to restate that I am sorry for all the hurt I have caused and am in a spot in my life that I am really unhappy with my marriage and have to many hormones running through me right now to really make good judgments so I want publicly apologize to Bob and say that while I do nt believe in God as yet have started to read my Bible that I bought the other day and am considering becoming a Christian.

So for example, in my case and that of other persons whose minds dissociate when we engage in intense / deep spiritual practices like intense / deep prayer, meditation, fasting etc and we hear voices, hallucinate, see visions, experience thought insertions, automatic channelling just like a spirit medium as well as other psychic phenomena (clairvoyance etc), and the mind dissociation makes some persons mentally and emotionally unstable; our minds enter an altered state of consciousness just like those of the Buddhist monks but in our case the altered state of our brains results in psychotic and psychic symptoms being induced (interestingly, some persons who are ignorant of how the human brain functions chalk up these experiences to demonic attack)......... are these psychotic, psychic experiences which persons like myself experience a gift from God as well?

On the other hand, if you want to display the crossed beams because you feel the symbol makes a point and you want people to know that YOUR god was there, or that the attack was on YOUR religion... then that is exactly the reason * not * to display the crossed beams.

It is not the fact that theologians have grown up that makes them attack each other.

No, because the end justify s the means and you have already made up your mind that you are right about Jesus and there can be no other truth, and it's never about learning more about different people and cultures and religions, it's about making sure anyone who is different knows you are a Christian which is the only sensible way to live and anyone who is not like you is either converted, attacked, pitied or dismissed as a fool who awaits eternal damnation.

Only the Jews are attacked for believing in One G - d but the other religions took what they wanted and made their own religions.

Voicing my questions has often caused others to recoil or, worse, attack, making quicksand a more attractive alternative at times.

Unlike humans, who can and often do set out to make others suffer, animals are primarily concerned to «protect their territory,» as students of their behavior tell us, or to save their young from attack, or to secure necessary supplies of food for their survival.

Besides that, there are no Christian nations right now that are responsible for killing 3,000 Americans, 200 Spaniards, 50 people in London and nearly 20,000 plus other DEADLY terrorist attacks made for their allah since 9/11 alone.

Attacking theocentrically oriented theologians like Stanley J. Samartha, Ashish Chrispal says that such thinking «moves away from the centrality of Christ and the triune God,» and that Samartha «fails to recognise that the kind of pluralism he and other pluralists propose can make the religions a matter of indifference or can take a form of pious scepticism or people may renounce all religious choices, since they can live equally without them» and goes on to emphasise that

On the other hand your posts have nothing positive to say, your attack on people and making fun of those who are reaching out to needy kids (case in point this blog) is useless / futile and is helping no cause.

It does make me uncomfortable to think that my act of being a «Christian» is coming under attack by others.

Atheists now: Vehement children, pathetically attacking the beliefs of others and asserting their disbelief makes them rational rather than their rationality leading to their disbelief.

We're quick to attack each other when hot - button issues make headlines, when anger's been lurking at the top of our feeds all the while.

Now I come close to the theme of this article: one writer, and I have found no other, in the early Middle Ages attacked classical theism head - on precisely on its two most vulnerable points — its affirmation of, or failure definitely to reject, unqualified theological determinism, and its commitment to endless posthumous careers for human persons, making them in that respect rivals to God.

People kill for the sake of killing in this world, people chop down trees just for the pleasure of watching them fall, they kill little animals, there are people out there who live to wreak havoc on others, even in the most insignificant wayâ $» whether itâ $ ™ s making someone feel bad or attacking someone where it hurts the most.

According to the Egypt Independent, Rasha Magdi made the comment when reporting on last Friday's terror attack on a mosque that killed more than 300 people and injured more than 100 others.

- Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing material that is obscene, racist, homophobic or sexist or that contains any form of hate speech; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that infringe copyright; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are illegal, libellous, defamatory or may prejudice ongoing legal proceedings or breach a court injunction or other order; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are abusive, threatening or make any form of personal attack on another user or an employee of Packaging Europe magazine; - Post Messages in any language other than English; - Post the same Message, or a very similar Message, repeatedly; - Post or otherwise publish any Messages unrelated to the Forum or the Forum's topic; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing any form of advertising or promotion for goods and services or any chain Messages or «spam»; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages with recommendations to buy or refrain from buying a particular security or which contain confidential information of another party or which otherwise have the purpose of affecting the price or value of any security; - Disguise the origin of any Messages; - Impersonate any person or entity (including Packaging Europe magazine employees or Forum guests or hosts) or misrepresent any affiliation with any person or entity; - Post or transmit any Messages that contain software viruses, files or code designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of the Site or any computer software or equipment, or any other harmful component; - Collect or store other users» personal data; and / or - Restrict or inhibit any other user from using the Forums.

I tell them about how eating gluten makes my tiny little doo - dads in my stomach attack each other which leaves me feeling extremely tired, poopy (literally), and don't forget the MIGRAINES.

wenger is at fault» good players like sanchez, özil and ramsey should be able to make good shift even at other attacking positions..

Of course we had the priceless advantage of having real men play for us instead of little timid and afraid children in defence and especially in midfield or attack like Ozil, Walcott and all the other serail coasters who have made a rich living under their benevolent Uncle Arsene, who indulges their timidity and blames the refs, rather than coward players.

As for pressing higher up, Vardy moves about and his movement is nothing Giroud has ever done, if we go back to before Giroud then you will see how RvP was moving around to get the ball and be active in the game, not a static fool like Giroud who could only hold the ball up for others... which slows down any attack we make.

As a result, it would surely require a player to head out first to make space for Werner, but having spent so heavily on their attack, it's only logical that they address their issues at the other end of the pitch given that they possess the worst defensive record of the top seven Premier League sides this season having conceded 36 goals in 27 games.

wenger is a legend in his own mind so other peoples opinions... fans, ex players, journalists, etc... have no bearing on his greatness or the righteousness of his own decisions... from end of last season it was clear we needed two quality attacking options to put up a serious challenge (getting rid of walcott and campbell or ox and bringing in a serious upgrade over giroud) instead he brought in another midfield option (having done the same in the winter window) which only makes sense in his own delusional world rather than the reality of facing up to serious and strengthening competitors and which defines the job at hand....

og is gwd @aerial attacks, cnt & wnt score easily one on one wt the keeper, we all knw walcot is athreat wen one on one wt the keeper, that makes mi agree that its tym wenger should use both of them upfront, they could capitalriz each others weaknes.ts s ma opinion iam nt an expert thats y am jo nd nt wenger critics kip off