Sentences with phrase «making simple sense»

I realised straight away that this bloke had a rare knack of making simple sense and «pushing some unused buttons».

When you consider the goal is always «food first,» it should make simple sense that it's so much better to eat your nutrients than to supplement with them whenever possible.

Not exact matches

In the meantime, take a stand that makes sense for your brand, keep it simple, and back it up with action.

He explained how a simple mission for his staff, like «reducing crime in neighborhoods,» removes distractions and keeps everyone aligned and focused on the sort of future growth that makes sense.

The investment philosophy should be explained in simple terms that make sense to you.

Once we're on that path, lower, simpler rates indeed make sense.

As a result, you can make more sense of your data — and unify your business processes into simpler dashboards that don't require a computer science degree to use.

There was a time, when computers worked on 64 kilobytes of RAM and every character counted, that simple codes like this made sense.

Jurich's first reason to skip car ownership is perhaps the simplest — commuting by car is objectively awful (really, study after study ranks it as one of life's most misery - inducing activities), so given that she lives in a place that provides alternatives, it simply makes sense to take them.

It's a simple process that makes complete sense — allow people to thrive where they can and allow others to step in if that's their calling.

It makes sense to optimize the hours we have left in the week to make life simpler and more convenient.

And she offered a simple solution that emerged from more than 100,000 pieces of data in her vulnerability research: confront the story you're telling yourself to make sense of the situation.

Dividends made sense 40 years ago as a relatively simple rule of thumb, but after all the work done by John Bogle with index investing, and academics with Monte Carlo sims and the 4 % rule, dividend investing just isn't the simplest, cleanest way to invest or receive passive income anymore.

I was kind of like I said interested in gambling or at least speculating or figuring things out and then taking a calculated gamble and what they were telling me was don't try, there were saying that no one can beat the market and the stock prices are efficient and just through simple observation looking at the newspaper and they used to have the 52 - week high low prices in the newspaper, it seemed unreasonable that you know the fair price was 51 day and eight months later, it was 120, and that was pretty much every stock had that kind of range every year and it didn't make sense to me that the fundamentals of the underlying businesses were actually changing that much.

When you consider the traditional weeks - long process and reams of documents associated with a traditional loan application, a simple, easy - to - understand, online loan application makes a lot of sense for time - crunched small business owners.

Simple prompts like, «Does that make sense?»

This simple calculation provides a ballpark figure that can help determine which route makes the most financial sense.

With ZiftrPAY, we're creating a simple, secure shopping experience for merchants and shoppers, so it makes perfect sense for us to incorporate two - factor authentication from a company that also values simplicity and security.

Keeping that simple fact in mind, it makes all the financial sense to invest in this crypto coin without any further ado.

The concept of paying yourself first is simple and makes a lot of sense if you think about it.

Funny how such a simple concept as that makes more sense than the borderline insidious strategies churches use to supposedly get people saved (or grow more lavish buildings).

All an evolutionary storyteller has to do is to start with the apparently simplest version, ignore the neural equipment that has to be present for an organism to make any use of a «photon receptor,» and spin a charming tale about how a tiny primitive light - sensing cell might grow up to be a full - fledged eye.

What I am urging is that we understand the difference between the traditional interpreters and Ford as that between the effort to make sense of Whitehead's intuition in terms of Whitehead's categories and disallowing it because it conflicts with the simplest understanding of some of those categories.

The reason the church adapted some of the symbolism and practices from their surrounding pagan culture is an interesting study, but the simplest explanation which makes the most sense to people today is found in our own culture.

Neither were they «minimizers,» in the sense that they were willing to make the Christian faith an easy and simple thing which would appeal to any «man of good will.»

For others, it's a nagging thought — as you work out your faith on your own, you keep coming back to this Jesus, and you can't make sense of him all the way, but you also can't accept everything he says because it seems somehow too hard to live that way, or too complex, or too simple, or merely out of your grid of experience.

After reading all the posts it now makes perfect sense to me and it is really simple.

The question then is whether it actually makes more sense that something so complicated and intelligent really has a better chance than a simple, unintelligent universe of surviving infinite timelessness and being a «first cause»?

What I can't get is how an infinite super being without a physical body with magical powers and a strange interest in what we do in our bedrooms actually makes better sense to some people than an infinite, utterly simple natural universe.

No matter how many drones you have or how advanced your weapons are, nothing will be changed as long as the Islamic ideology is fulled of hatred and vengeance and their mindset can not make a simple common sense.

As he did so, I could sense the power of this simple prayer, and made the commitment to memorize it and pray it several times a day.

Many times i was tempted to just accept and say this is true, only because it made some sense, but it isn't that simple.

The Relevance of Cosmic Unity In the lead letter of the same issue of Philosophy Now the prominent anti-reductionist philosopher of ethics and of science Mary Midgely makes a point often made by Edward Holloway (though he might not have used the word «choice»), namely that «simple logic surely shows that natural selection can not be the universal explanation because «selection» only makes sense a clearly specified range of choices — an idea to which far too little attention has been given.»

For faith to reject the historical traces of its most important figures doesn't make sense to Catholics, of course, who venerate shrines associated with saints and martyrs, but Wahhabi doctrine is clear and simple.

With this method, we have not simply done away with linguistic clutter, we have made the positive assertion that the ultimate «simple» or constituents of things experienced are neither the objects of common sense nor the «scientific» objects of physical theory (electrons, quarks, and the like).

Eventually enough people will come to their senses and will pay more attention to objective evidence - based research and not the simple little fairy tales in religious texts that made sense back when humans were far less educated.

For a variety of reasons, perhaps including inadequate catechesis, many Catholics are ill - equipped to make sense of the priestly or religious life and are therefore incapable of discerning that the priestly or religious life, in its simple existence, might «radiate the word of truth».

Really simple and inclusion - y and Methodist - y (< that will make sense to the Methodists).

I have come to a point that it makes no sense to keep trying to rehabilitate Christianity to reflect some type of humanity when simply going directly to the truth is far simpler.

The Universe has been «made» in the sense in which «making» denotes continuous and harmonious development from the simple to the complex.

Christ is God, and God is Love So, if God is love, and has created the whole of the cosmos for the simple purpose of loving and fulfilling us, it makes sense to seek from Him that which will satisfy us completely.

I understand that given the mathematical impossibility of hundreds of thousands of working parts randomly / accidently being formed into the first, simple reproducing life form, intelligent design not only makes a lot of sense it's an absolute requirement.

Yet this claim likewise makes no sense — for the simple reason that scientific method by definition has nothing to say about God, meaning, values or purpose.

The sense of the kind of object to which the surrender is made has much to do with determining the precise complexion of the joy; and the whole phenomenon is more complex than any simple formula allows.

Thus this position, like that of material atomism, makes a basic distinction in status among entities between those comprising the ultimate constituents, which are «simple,» in the sense of not being composites, and those which are composites.

i hope all this makes sense as what they have done is made a simple system unecessarily complex with things so as to distract people from the solution.

But it is precisely not «this stone» which, as a simple event» or a «simple object,» makes possible this individual sense certainty and the communication of truth which is built upon this certainty; rather, it is the structure of the world «embodied» by the stone which performs this task.

It's a sad way to argue a point, but it makes more simple sense than many other comments.

Or, even in us ordinary mortals, the sense of duty which made Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn say that conscience «takes up more room than all the rest of a person's insides» — that is not simple.

The Buddhist philosophy is simple and it makes sense of the word «eternity & suffering».