Teachers should select informational or literary texts that speak to the topics that students find relevant or engaging so they can gauge for themselves if the authors are
making valid arguments.
Tom Tom makes too many as sumptions about others.No wonder it can't
make a valid argument and why does it have to think that it is only one that lives in a good neighborhood and that everyone else lives in a trailor?
If you are going to
make a valid argument against Wenger you should learn to ground your argument in facts.
And a lot of the abuse comes from WOBS who can't
make a valid argument.
You could have
made a valid argument regarding the difficulty of searching out the gems hidden amongst the literary ore produced by indie authors.
The industry classifies disability insurance as supplemental health insurance — so you can
make a valid argument in favor of this deduction.
The other uses words in the ordinary way; The other makes true statements; The other
makes valid arguments; The other says something interesting.
Last week, Lloyd Alter was critical of parents» claims that Wi - Fi may pose a health threat to students at elementary schools, and
he made some valid arguments.
Statistically speaking, there is no better preparation for success in law than an undergraduate degree spent thinking about the nature of knowledge, the meaning of being and, especially, what
makes a valid argument.
Not exact matches
Here is a post from Libertarian News that begins, «I recently got into an
argument over on the Reddit Bitcoin boards where I held the position that fractional reserve banking with Bitcoins was not possible,» which sounds fun; he recants that view but does
make what I think is a very
valid point:
In fact, a
valid argument could be
made in both directions.
I've seen some
valid arguments made for holding a large percentage of bonds.
When some asshat like you, just sayin, HeavenSent, Bob, etc.
make blanket statements and refuse to respond to corrections, criticisms, or
valid points refuting those statements, then there is no point in bringing up any kind of
argument.
Taken as a whole they've
made a very compelling
argument that the explanations of the universe provided by both science and religion are incomplete and always evolving, and that one perspective is no more or less
valid than another.
and the ad hominem attacks continue... boo hoo... I don't have a
valid argument to counter his claims... I'll just call him names to
make myself feel better...
@Liz — It seems like the
argument you are
making is
valid but only from the perspective of either creating a high risk of complication / retardation which science has proven when children are born to closely related people, and the «Ick» factor of not wanting to imagine two siblings getting it on.
To go along with this, you have to believe three things, all controversial: (1) that authenticity is a
valid idea; (2) that you can argue in reason about ideals and about the conformity of practices to these ideals; and (3) that these
arguments can
make a difference.
Fortunately, crack pots on either side of the extreme
make it easy to shoot down their
arguments, because they don't have many
valid arguments.
There are
valid arguments against some claims
made as to the age of ice cores.
(that's a
valid argument to
make) Did you have concerns about their methodologies?
My point being that taking a member of the set of all things Jesus never explicitly taught on and positing, if only by implication, that his silence is an endorsement of that thing is not a
valid foundation for
making a sound
argument.
IN all the
arguments for and against abortion, the ONLY
valid statement
made is one of CHOICE.
Mr. Blair's point is that such
arguments should be allowed and encouraged in the public sphere as
valid means of
making moral
arguments.
If I'm presented with an
argument that is
valid and
makes sense then I will change my mind.
I would posit that an
argument could be
made for the existance of Christianity if Paul had not been invovled as equally
valid, therfore this being a moot point.
The necessity I am denying is not that argued for by the ontological
argument but, rather, that which must first be argued for to
make the
argument ultimately
valid.
A
valid and reasonable
argument has been
made for both positions.
In fact, the crunching of numbers to
make an
argument appear more
valid is done by pretty much everyone on this planet.
Because EVERY
valid argument that folks have
make for redefining marriage for Gays, can equally be used for the legalization of Polygamy (think Sharia Law), and even group marriages.
And he is even humble enough to concede when others are
making valid points to their
arguments.
I know you must be pretty proud of yourself by sounding like your
making a
valid scientific
argument for an all knowing fairy in the sky, but your not.
Ahhh, yes... Can't
make a
valid cogent
argument, so, what do you do but,
make a silly veiled «threat» against me.
I can definitely see why soo many people are confused as to what sin actually means in the bible... because they are not willing to read the book to
make an
argument valid enough
McMahon does
make a
valid point, and he added another important
argument that Mourinho will only risk more criticism if he plays negatively and City still win.
My point is that this issue is not nearly as black or white as supporters on either side would have us believe; there are
valid arguments to be
made for eliminating flavored milk from school lunches and for continuing to offer that choice.
Yes, I think the critique which you
make of some the politics / media presentation of Denham's
argument chimes with points Don Paskino has also
made, and I think some of this is a
valid critique if we want to avoid these trenchlines into which the debate risks going.
However, the idea that if society needs to bring resources to bear it is somehow not a fundamental human right is an
argument that seems to
make assumptions about being somehow
valid more than any demonstration of validity having been
made.
Euclid
made repeated use of axioms that he had not stated, without which his
arguments are not logically
valid.
For an
argument to be
valid, its premises — the things that the
argument is assuming to be true — must be put into a relationship by the person
making the
argument that entails the
argument's conclusion.
Although they agreed that it would allow them to
make valid inferences about students» ability to construct grammatically correct sentences, they determined that it did not provide enough information to allow them to assess student progress in developing compelling
arguments.
But if this
argument is really
valid, why not
make it just a one year commitment for all the potentially great people who are scared away by the two year commitment?
If the increase in non-AMZ revenue doesn't come close to
making up for the lost sales in AMZ, then it's not really a
valid argument, other than lessening your reliance on AMZ (which I agree is a sound long term goal) and also being able to get into Bookbub (since they wont feature a book in Kindle Select.)
Most
arguments that have been
made against the iPad's enterprise features and management are
valid — right now.
Make sure that are substantiating your conclusion solutions with proper reasons and
valid arguments.
Please
make sure that the information you \'re using is correct - the more incorrect it is, the more likely people will continue to dismiss
valid arguments.
Eric
makes some
valid points about his «Puppies are dicks»
argument.
Animal Hoarding Dauphiné and Cooper's
argument presupposes that enough is known both about «people involved in TNR» and «the psychiatric disorders described in problematic animal hoarding» for a
valid comparison to be
made.
But, some of those
arguments make claims which may not be
valid or true.
I just don't see how a
valid argument can be
made that no one should breed beagles when pits are dieing in shelters.
I think that's a
valid argument, but it's a problem Hyatt could resolve by simply
making these certificates good for an entire year.