Naturally the preference is for the data to be preserved so that it can be ascertained which party is
making valid claims.
You would have to establish that the total tax paid by the election winning voters was more than the total tax paid by the election losing voters to
make any valid claim about taxes paid and policy preferences.
If you're
making a valid claim that is actually supported by science then you shouldn't have any need to be this deceptive.
Receive a replacement device 2 to 3 days after
you make a valid claim.
The 2 - year warranty from SquareTrade guarantees you will receive a replacement device 2 to 3 days after
you make a valid claim.
If they can
make a valid claim that the charge doesn't tell the whole story and is incomplete, they might have a shot at getting it removed as I said above.
If a valid Best Price Guarantee claim is submitted without an existing reservation, the individual
making the valid claim will be contacted by Hotel Name 1 and must make a reservation in the manner communicated by Hotel Name 1 within 24 hours from receipt of the communication or local check - in time at Hotel Name 1 Hotel.
A Best Price Guarantee reward will only be provided if the individual
making the valid claim stays in the reserved guest room.
If a valid Best Rate Guarantee claim is submitted without an existing reservation, the individual
making the valid claim will be contacted by Starwood and must make a reservation in the manner communicated by Starwood by the earlier of 24 hours from receipt of the communication or local check - in time at the relevant Starwood Hotel.
You may have many questions about whether or not you can
make a valid claim.
Anyone who was in some way financially dependent on the deceased at the time of death may be able to
make a valid claim, so that also applies to children outside marriages, cohabitees and even mistresses.»
In case of damage to your house or household goods, you need to
make a valid claim.
When
you make a valid claim, the WA company evaluates the damages and then cuts you a check accordingly.
Not exact matches
and the ad hominem attacks continue... boo hoo... I don't have a
valid argument to counter his
claims... I'll just call him names to
make myself feel better...
There are
valid arguments against some
claims made as to the age of ice cores.
Nor can this consequence be avoided by saying that, substantive prescriptions aside, a
valid claim could still be
made for the principle of communicative respect itself.
If it is
valid that not respecting another's right to live forfeits any
claim one can
make for one's own life, it applies even to the killings erupting from anger, jealousy or revenge which
make up such a large part of murder statistics but are not normally subject to capital punishment.
Commonly one hears little about the demoniacal, notwithstanding that this field, particularly in our time, has a
valid claim to be explored, and notwithstanding that the observer, in case he knows how to get a little in rapport with the demon, can, at least occasionally,
make use of almost every man for this purpose.
I agree with Bill Maher, but then again I'm a lifelong atheist... I have never believed for one minute that the god as portrayed in the bible or koran has any possibility of being real to everyone, otherwise that god would
make itself obvious and not hide behind man
made lies and cultural practices that self perpetuate thanks fo fear... otherwise there would not be several thousand man
made religions trying to
claim that god as their own... yes, it is an opinion, only
valid to the opinion holder and no one else... Bill, thanks for so strongly
making that point, not that it
makes any difference to god fearing people... they will hold on to their opinion as strongly as they hold on to their shotgun, thinking that each provides them with some form of security... to intelligent people, neither is secure and neither leads to true freedom of the mind...
However, even if a manufacturer
makes such a
claim there is no way to know whether such
claims are actually
valid because they generally are not backed by third - party testing or adherence to independent standards of transportation and processing, etc..
The Algerian, whose contract is
valid till 2020, handed in a transfer request last summer and his desire to
make an exit remained unchanged as reports
claimed he handed in a fresh transfer request on Tuesday, a day before deadline day.
The Food and Drug Administration is considering tougher oversight of infant formula labeling and advertising to ensure that the often misleading «structure / function»
claims companies
make («comfort proteins»; «designed to be more like breast milk») are
valid.
You could presumably
make the same
claim about Quantitative Easing, but that is not a
valid reason not to do it.
Adewole, said the
claim made recently by a Nigerian university don, Prof Maduike Ezeibe had no
valid ethical approval by the relevant health authorities.
Officials
claim that their only purpose is to
make sure the signatures on the petition are
valid
Walton argues that an ad hominem is
valid when the
claims made about a person's character or actions are relevant to the conclusions being drawn.
Oh, and if you're one of those guys who
claim they simply can't force themselves to eat the large amounts of food the process of mass building depends on, your point is
valid but that doesn't
make it a
valid excuse to stop trying.
I would guess that the information in this video is just as
valid as any
claims made by paleo diet proponents.
I know of no
valid evidence to
make the
claim that two out of three eighth graders are below grade level in reading and math.
To date Pennsylvania's Department of Education (PDE) apparently has ignored the fact that the Data Recognition Corporation (DRC), the vendor of its state tests, has avoided
making any
claims that their tests are
valid for use as measures of teacher performance (see, for example, here).
But the report, loaded with inaccuracies and distortions, ultimately proved that a study commissioned by a teachers union is about as
valid as preposterous
claims made by a 3 am TV pitchman hawking wrinkle cream.
Likewise, the lower court rejected the ACLU's Blaine Amendment
claim, holding that it «was not intended to preclude any expenditure that has an incidental benefit to religion, where such is
made for a primary secular purpose,» and that the ESA «was enacted for the
valid secular purpose of providing financial assistance to parents to take advantage of educational options available to Nevada children.»
More and more States are adopting these tests and,
valid or not, use the results to
make claims about overall student college readiness.
We train our sales staff regularly however any verbal
claims or promises
made by the employees of the dealership are not
valid unless expressed in writing.
Both models can arguably
claim to being the best of the lot and both
make valid points for doing so.
The insurance company has a duty to investigate a
claim to
make sure that it's
valid before paying it.
But the writing company that they purchased has, in fact, been writing insurance for the period of time that they
claim and so it's a
valid and legitimate statement for them to
make.
Your policy ends once a
valid claim has been
made and a cash sum paid out.
The insurance company pays for that lawyer because it benefits you, the company, and other policyholders to
make sure they're only paying
valid claims.
But, some of those arguments
make claims which may not be
valid or true.
Procedure to
Make a Request To submit a
valid court order of protection and / or a request to receive communications of
claim related information by alternative means or at alternative locations to Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection please use the following address:
A
valid Best Rate Guarantee
claim may be invalidated if (1) the individual
making the
claim fails to
make a reservation in the required time period, (2) the name on the submitted
claim form does not match the guest's name on the relevant reservation, or (3) any changes are
made to the relevant reservation after such reservation is
made.
According to the Associated Press (AP), however, the Trump Organization's lawyers said Panamanian courts had
made no determination on the underlying dispute — a management contract held by the Trump group that it
claims is still
valid — and had only appointed an interim management until an international arbitration panel rules on the issue.
He references this AMEG nonsense, presents it as
valid science (although it is the furthest thing from), grossly exaggerates articles to
make a point, and
claims utter nonsense (6 °C by 2050, more than 100 % more than any credible institution predicts under any scenario) and never backs up his
claims with numbers (especially his feedbacks, apart from the AMEG / methane stuff).
People respect your opinion, but
claiming Monckton has
made even one
valid point of any significance about anything really does need to be backed by some specifics.
A cogent (strong) argument can then be
made that the next person to be considered will also prefer that brand, and the poll is
valid evidence of that
claim.
His opposition stemmed partly from the
valid argument that they impose real hardship on Iranians, but also from the very dubious
claim that they
make war more likely, and from the legally ridiculous assertion that western use of financial tools to block oil sales «is a financial blockade, and blockades are acts of war.»
I realize it's kind of late for
making suggestions, but here goes anyway: Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner
claim to have falsified the existence of an atmospheric greenhouse effect.It looks like you have addressed T&G's main arguments (eg, about the 2nd law), but I wonder if it might be appropriate to put in a brief description of what it means to «falsify» something in the scientific sense — ie, essentially what T&G must show (and failed to show) to
make their case that there is no greenhouse effect: namely, 1) experimental evidence that shows the opposite of what an atmospheric greenhouse effect would necessarily produce and / or 2) evidence that the greenhouse effect would actually violate some physical law (eg, 2nd law of thermo) The pot on the stove example is obviously an attempt to show that you get a colder temp with the water than without, but I think it's worthwhile explicitly stating that «because T&G failed to demonstrate that the pot on the stove example is a
valid analogy for the earth, they failed to falsify the atmospheric greenhouse effect» And you could also add a sentence stating that «because T&G failed to show that the greenhouse effect would require a violation of the 2nd law [because their arguments were incorrect], they also failed to falsify»
I suggest people stop
making assertive statements that simply
claim that I am wrong, without a single word of
valid physics to support their contention.
While these earlier periods are outside the
claims of the IPCC statement, the point is
valid that we need to know the character of natural variability to
make claims about the extent of human influence on global temperatures.