Sentences with phrase «making wrong investments»

You are likely to lose out on tax savings and you may land up making wrong investments.

Other reasons for the losses could include losing out in competition or making wrong investments, she said in Jakarta on Wednesday, as reported by kompas.com.

What should you do when you realise that you have made a wrong investment decision?

However, if you make the wrong investment making wrong topic choices, bad genre picks and combinations, or develop games for an unsuccessful platform both your sales and critical success may suffer.

If markets are badly designed by governments then they will make the wrong investment decisions.

By being proactive, you also minimize your chances of making a wrong investment in haste.

Not exact matches

«If they were buying it for the real estate investment, they made the wrong decision,» says Kelly, who notes that Intrawest's remaining developable property in Whistler had a modest book value of between $ 75 million and $ 100 million.

They are willing to take a project that might seem hard or put themselves on stage even though they might sound stupid or to make a hard investment decision even if they may be criticized or wrong.

It Starts with a Buzz The University of Life Service, Service, Service What Business Should You Be In When is the right time to Start a business Don't Be a Flake Get It Right from the Start - Build Your Business like an Egyptian Pyramid My First Business Venture How I Started My Business Where It Went Wrong Making a Mistake Don't Burn Your Bridges Damage Limitation and Control How I Moved On Controlling Your Financial Exposure Getting Help with Your Idea How do You Research Your Idea Why You Have a Business Always Be Prepared Vertical or Horizontal Vision What Direction to Follow Leadership and Employing Staff Guiding Your Management Team Enjoy Your Work and Your Life Get Your Products and Services Right Low Cost Products and Service is not the Way Ahead Do You Need a Business Partner Business Expansion If You Want to Diversify, of What Should You Be Aware More Examples of Business Expansion The Importance of Good Time Keeping Time Management Real Estate Investment Finding the Solution

Too many businesses for sale simply do not make enough money to be a viable investment, the location is wrong, or something else makes the deal not what it appears.

Often we are faced with disparate information, incomplete data, only parts of the puzzle rather than the whole, or hints and innuendo rather than verifiable fact, and then are required to make important investment decisions where the downside if we get it wrong can be quite painful.

While we may have been wrong in 2016, the underlying issues that led these companies to be placed in the Danger Zone in the first place made them rather risky investments.

Many traders in the binary options trading portal fail or lose money because they make investments with the wrong or fraudulent brokers.

Feb 08, 2018 Everyone makes mistakes and when it comes to your investment strategy, some wrong moves can be worse than others.

If you prepare yourself psychologically for any investment environment ahead of time it decreases the chances of blowing up your portfolio by making unforced errors at the wrong time.

However, if you are a single doctor making $ 300,000 per year, did not have to address a meaningful debt burden, and only have $ 100,000 in investments at the age of forty, you have done something very wrong (most likely, you either lived at your means or traded stocks instead of thinking like an owner that made long - term investments) even if you have that same $ 100,000 in paper wealth because you had the skill set and personal opportunity costs to do so much more with your hand in life.

«disconfirmation of a belief doesn't always lead to the repudiation of that belief, which is why providing evidence that a belief is wrong will not necessarily make a person abandon that belief if their investment in it is strong enough.»

What makes my blood boil is the AOB telling me what's wrong with the club, the lack of tactics, player investment etc... but then never come up with ideas that can then be as intensely scrutinized as AOB's are with Wenger.

LOOK if kroenke wants a business where he can only care about himself and the profits then we should make him know that he is in the wrong venture or investment actually.You understand americans don't LOVE FOOTBALL maybe BASEBALL eeh!

Whilst not completely wrong, it's his big flaw, making decisions, throwing away potential, recognising the investment is never going to deliver a return.

Compared to Arsenal who are still putting their hopes In a lot of average / mediocre players, refusing to make significant investment and justifying that with words like solidarity togetherness balance you realise there is something deeply and inherently wrong at the club!

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

If you are willing to make the investment, you really can't go wrong with a Maclaren or UPPAbaby G - Luxe.

And I just think that even the skeptics about this issue are starting to believe that this is a wrong - headed investment we've made in our children in this country, where we put all of the money into children after they have lots of problems, and hardly any money before these kids get into problems.

If you are willing to make a rather pricey investment but for the benefit of your baby, you can not go wrong with the Medela Symphony Breast Pump.

«If he made these investments wittingly, then there's something really wrong with that,» Credico said.

In a release, U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said the men «join the ranks of high - level investment fund managers who are being made to answer for their extraordinarily bad risk - reward analysis about what is right and what is wrong.»

But to generalize beyond this case study that all technology in education is not worth the investment makes no sense and asks the wrong question, as Jonathan Schorr argues persuasively.

Some of the most important investment lessons for beginners centre on learning how to make the best long - term stock picks while staying away from costly investing mistakes Investing success comes from making more right decisions than wrong ones over a long period of time.

Many in the media make investment picks, but what Kiplinger's does well is revisit those picks and compare their success to index funds to give you insight into where those picks went wrong.

There is nothing wrong with buying and selling investments if you have a solid investment plan and make your buys and sells based on that plan.

However, if you are a single doctor making $ 300,000 per year, did not have to address a meaningful debt burden, and only have $ 100,000 in investments at the age of forty, you have done something very wrong (most likely, you either lived at your means or traded stocks instead of thinking like an owner that made long - term investments) even if you have that same $ 100,000 in paper wealth because you had the skill set and personal opportunity costs to do so much more with your hand in life.

As I have pointed out in previous letters, each investment the Fund makes has something wrong with it, and we spend a lot of time trying to figure out what is wrong and worrying about it.

So you see, you can be wrong and still make money, or, another way of looking at it is, you can't tell if you're right with your investment thesis just because you DO make money.

Every investor, some time or the other makes a wrong decision regarding the investments.

We may be wrong if we assume that current markets are at high level Suggest you to make the additional investments as 2 — 3 installments, with a hope that markets give you low NAV in next 3 months.

10 investing mistakes one should avoid Every investor, some time or the other makes a wrong decision regarding the investments.

You eliminate the risk of an investment manager or fund manager screwing up, making the wrong bets, or taking too much risk.

Mutual funds are a great investment for a number of individuals and families because they help take the worry out of making the «wrong» financial decision and possibly harming your financial future.

By making yourself accountable — for the sock left on the floor, the forgotten phone call or the totally wrong decision on an investment — you can get past the mistake and so can those who are affected by it.

In this case, I don't think the errors make a lot of difference to the investment decision, but I will confess to being wrong on details in my last post.

Wexboy, Reference your 30th Sept current summary in KR1, From my point of view I am in awe of your 2 % holding in KR1, The figures are very compelling and staggering in forward potential, I might have this projection all wrong but here goes, As of today 22/10/17 we have an sp of 7p, quoting your average roi on holdings within the table we have x 15 within the last 7 months giving us a current book to value of x 3.5 = sp 24.5 p, Should we assume another x 15 (I appreciate the x 15 was on the back of Ethereum, s metaphoric rise and other crypto, s tracking) over the next 12 months and and sp follows suit to say 100p, THEN we factor in a us listing and as you state the us markets award much higher book value with the average p / b in the blockchain cc sector of x 20, Then we are looking at (without dilution) in 12 months - = MC of # 2 BILLION = # 20 SP AS you state in your summary the figures are staggering so is the ablove a realistic projected mc based on the last 7 months growth and returns on investments made in CC ICO, s?

Don't get me wrong: cyclical companies have their place in a diversified stock portfolio, they get dirt cheap from time to time and can make terrific investments even for the longer term.

Money is always an emotional subject, but often when our emotions get involved with our investments, we will make wrong decisions.

Not too many cigar butts laying on the street just yet, but they may be here in the next few months if your CAPE analysis is wrong — so if there is a silver lining, it is that you will be back to evaluating fantastic investment opportunities and making money for your readers...

Therefore, margin of safety is a concept value investors impose on themselves to say, «even if I am wrong and things turn out worse than I expect, I will still hopefully make a reasonable return on my investment if I purchase at or below this price, which is well below my calculation of intrinsic value.»

When it comes to making investments, generally you can't go wrong with real estate.

starting with «DMG» — Sharp was approached to manufacture the screens of the DMG because it already supplied the Game & Watch displays — Sharp was unable to produce the screens at a price low enough for Nintendo so that development of the console reached a dead point — R&D 1 learned about the «Chip on Glass» technique which would make a cheap production possible and approached TV maker Citizen to produce the Game Boy's screens using this technique — in the end, Sharp was also able to use the CoG technique and was thus chosen to produce the screens and made a four billion yen investment for that — the screens Sharp produced at the beginning were of a wrong type and were next to useless for the Game Boy project — Yokoi remembers Hiroshi Yamauchi's reaction on Game Boy prototype with wrong screen type: «What the hell is this?

Each year gets better and I'm no longer making some of the big investment mistakes like attending bad shows or the wrong shows for my work.

No «investment» can be made correctly without this feedback and government peoples are the wrong type of people (risk adverse) to be making such decisions.