We relate best to God as we relate to a male and therefore God's bride the church best relates to
the male head of the church, but only as long as the male is focused on his responsibility of care for the church.
Not exact matches
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part
of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence
of twelve
male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence
of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the
church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding
head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line
of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry
of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy
of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws
of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading
of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse
of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.
To review: In their letters to the early
church, the apostles Peter and Paul include what you might call a Christian remix
of the traditional Greco - Roman household codes, which detailed the responsibilities
of a
male head -
of - house, his wives, slaves, and adult children (see Ephesians 5, Colossians 3, and 1 Peter 3).
Kirk maintains they are necessarily
male (and Jewish) because they are «a proleptic [anticipatory] symbol
of the coming kingdom», a divine reconstruction
of the twelve tribes
of Israel, founded on the twelve sons
of Jacob; although he adds this does not preclude «the possibility that Jesus has other ends in mind... a
church with Peter at its
head and the twelve apostles as the foundation stones
of its order and authority» (p. 43).
«The second person
of the Trinity is revealed as the eternal Son not daughter; the Father and the Son create man and woman in His image and give them the name man, the name
of the
male... God appoints all the priests in the Old Testament to be men; the Son
of God came into the world to be a man; He chose 12 men to be His apostles; the apostles appointed that the overseers
of the
Church be men; and when it came to marriage they taught that the husband should be the
head.»
He found that both groups strongly prefer a
male as
head of a
church staff.
How many pastors have been caught out having affairs on their wives, going to prostitutes, and going online dating lines for sex, what had undone David and Solomon was lust for women, but women everywhere are subjected to being told these men are the
head of the
church as if man himself is unfallable and can do know wrong, but
males you do do wrong!.