Not exact matches
kendallpeak Your att.itude only made sense in a
male - dominated world where women couldn't much hope for a life outside of
producing children and keeping house.
A few years ago, the center - left Third Way Foundation
produced a report called Wayward Sons, about the struggles of low - skilled men (and the struggles of their
children — especially their
male children) since 1970.
If, as the story goes, God created Adam and Eve as the first two humans, and Adam and Eve had two
male children, who did their
male children mate with to
produce future generations?
If this is true and I know it takes a
Male and a Female to
produce a
child; then where did the rest of us come from?
This type of personality seems to lend their pregnancies to
producing male children, which may be attributed to an increase in testosterone.
But in a culture where women are not permitted to leave the home unless accompanied by a
male, where education for women is seen as a waste of time and money, where a woman's only worth is to
produce male children and she is held responsible if she doesn't in spite of scientific evidence to the contrary, I don't believe that this practice is likely to cause any real change.
A combination of rising incomes, cheap technology — in this case ultrasound — and deep - rooted cultural norms strongly favoring boys over girls has
produced an increasingly distorted ratio of female to
male children.
Yet evolutionary theorists predict that
male desire should remain perpetually high in order for them to
produce many offspring, while female desire should decrease as their attention turns, historically, toward
child - rearing.