New evidence on how
mammals body size corresponds to global warming has just been published.
«How prehistoric humans influenced
mammal body size: Body size patterns of mammals affected as hominins expand across the globe.»
A new study titled Body size downgrading of mammals over the late Quaternary, released Friday in the journal Science, is the first to quantitatively show that human effects on
mammal body size predates their migration out of Africa and that size selective extinction is a hallmark of human activities and not the norm in mammal evolution.
If the current trend continues, terrestrial
mammal body sizes will become smaller than they have been over the past 45 million years.
By quantifying mammalian extinction selectivity, the researchers documented what happened to mammals as early humans left Africa through the compilation of extensive data including
mammal body size, climate, extinction status and geographic location over the last 125,000 years.
Not exact matches
He turned his light on it, expecting to see a small
mammal but instead, «couldn't quite understand what I was seeing,» That's because human eyes were never meant to rest upon the South American Goliath birdeater — a spider that measures one foot across, with a
body the
size of your fist and two - inch fangs.
The second relationship, Cope's rule, holds that terrestrial
mammals tend to evolve toward larger
body sizes.
The last time
mammal communities looked like that and had a mean
body size that small was after the extinction of the dinosaurs.
A scaling law basically represents how various measurements in a system — say, the
bodies of
mammals — change proportionally as
size changes.
Among the questions that this study raises are whether the surprisingly large number of neurons in bird brains comes at a correspondingly large energetic cost, and whether the small neurons in bird brains are a response to selection for small
body size due to flight, or possibly the ancestral way of adding neurons to the brain — from which
mammals, not birds, may have diverged.
Over time, the average
body size of
mammals on those other continents approached and then fell well below Africa's.
«In particular, we found a group called Laurasiatheria quickly increased their
body size and ecological diversity, setting them on a path that would result in a modern group containing
mammals as diverse as bats, cats, rhinos, whales, cows, pangolins, shrews and hedgehogs.»
The result: On average, herbivorous
mammals have a
body cavity that is twice as big as carnivores of a similar
body size.
Stankowich et al. used natural history data, including range overlap with potential predators,
body size, and activity patterns, in conjunction with comparative phylogenetic analyses on 181 species of
mammals to identify patterns of predation risk that could have contributed to the evolution of these two defensive strategies.
Using molar
size as a proxy for
body size, the researchers looked at
mammals in sediments from the fossil - rich Bighorn Basin of Wyoming.
The island rule predicts that populations of small
mammals evolve larger
body size on islands than on the mainland, whereas island - bound large
mammals evolve smaller
body size than their mainland counterparts.
Lizards use far less energy: at rest they generate 0.5 watts per kilogram of
body mass compared with about 10 watts for a similarly
sized mammal.
«We suspect this means that archaic humans and other hominins had already influenced
mammal diversity and
body size in the late - Pleistocene.»
They also used the conservation status of modern
mammals to model diversity and
body size distributions for 200 years in the future.
By comparing extinction events with the entire record of
mammal turnover over the past 65 million years, the researchers demonstrated that
body size and diet did not influence extinction risk for
mammals for most of their evolutionary history.
«One of the most surprising finds was that 125,000 years ago, the average
body size of
mammals on Africa was already 50 percent smaller than on other continents,» said Smith, a professor in the UNM Department of Biology who has studied megafauna extinction for more than 15 years.
The team are now investigating rates of evolution in these
mammals, as well as looking at
body size more specifically.
Birds and
mammals have brains that are up to 10 times larger, relative to
body size, than those of reptiles and other animals.
Domestic dog breeds are more varied in
body size and shape — not to mention coat color and fur length — than any other land - based
mammal.
The study is the first in any non-human
mammal to find that females use an acoustic cue as a marker for
body size in selecting a mate; and they like the big guys because they are more likely to provide healthy offspring — and the big guys are more likely to have the loud call.
But, relative to
body size, primates have much larger brains than any other animals, and we humans, not surprisingly, have the biggest brains of all — about six times larger than you would expect for a
mammal of our
size.
Oh, yeah: It also has the bushiest tail of any
mammal compared with its
body size.
On average, the
size of primates» brains is nearly double what is expected for
mammals of the same
body size.
«
Mammal body -
size responds to climate change in ancient Wyoming.»
By comparison,
body mass plus maximum running speed together can explain 89 percent of the variation in eye
size among
mammals.
The tiny gray
mammals can lose 20 percent of their
body size in the cold winter months, possibly to conserve energy.
Christy M. McCain — 2006 (3)(
[email protected]) Keywords: abundance,
body size, Costa Rica, elevation,
mammals, range
size, rodents
«If you think about statistical correlation between average life span and
body size in
mammals it generally tends to be positive - gorillas, elephants and whales are much longer lived than shrews, voles and mice,» says Daniel Promislow, professor of genetics at the University of Georgia.
Body size of late Quaternary
mammals.
«Because warming happened much slower during the Paleocene - Eocene Thermal Maximum,
mammals had more time to adjust their
body size.
«We're seeing about a third of the
mammals getting smaller and some of them getting a lot smaller, by as much as half of their original
body size,» Secord said.