It's an outdated paperback collection of novels written by
man about his interpretation of past events..
Not exact matches
For Mark's
interpretation of the life of Jesus as the career of the heavenly Son of
Man, walking
about Galilee incognito, dying and rising again, is the theology of a martyr church; and like all vital theology it is in closest relation to the daily life of those who thought it and believed it.
A non-religious
interpretation would call
men to participate in the suffering of God in his life of the world,» not in the first place thinking
about one's own needs, problems, sins and fears, but allowing oneself to be caught up into the way of Jesus Christ, into the messianic event, thus fulfilling Isa.
If one lets the no - inherent - free - will
interpretation of the less than 0.5 % of the Scriptures set the precedence on what the word of God says
about man's free will, then a person is forced to do some absurd reasoning /
interpretation of the majority of scriptures that imply that
man has the inherent ability to accept / believe or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, promises and gifts.
They have talked
about it in most diverse fashion, but they have all been intent upon making it a basic factor in the
interpretation of the lives of
men and women, whoever they may be, wherever they may live, and whatever idiom they may have found useful or helpful in putting into some sort of language this persistent fact in the total experience of members of the human race.
More accurately the «word of
man —
about his
interpretation of God».
What I have particularly in mind is that while there is much talk
about taking Jesus as a key to the
interpretation of human nature, as it is often phrased, or to the meaning of human life, or to the point of
man's existential situation, there is a lamentable tendency to stop there and not to go on to talk
about «the world» — by which Miss Emmet meant, I assume, the totality of things including physical nature; in other words the cosmos in its basic structure and its chief dynamic energy.
We are discussing the content and
man's
interpretation of the bible and it's many changed versions of the bible, what
about God's Holy Spirit?
To say that a happening functions paradigmatically is to say that it provides the determinative clue for
man's
interpretation of what reality is all
about.
The physical sciences and the life sciences also yield their full harvest of knowledge
about man only when the understanding gained through direct self - consciousness is used in the
interpretation of the methods and results of objective scientific investigation and of technical invention.
I think by you praying for Mr. Hawking is more for your benefit than his — because he could care less
about Jesus, or the
interpretations that
Man / people / humans made of flesh have made
about him.
When I read
about Calvin and others ideas on what Gods Word says, the Arminian, Lytheran, Wesleyan, Unitarian and various Church denominations and their
interpretations, particularly when they hang their whole idea on one part of the Bible to prove how right they are, it affirms what I have always thought since before I was saved by God as well as after that amazing act of grace on His part, that
man values and honors the mind far above the heart.
You're taking the imperfect
interpretations of
Men and assuming that somehow they are correct
about the activities and makings of God, rather than seeing that Religion and God are two completely different things.
Theintriguing mystery is what
interpretation are we to put on Jesus» remarks
about the final coming of the Son of
man: «But of that day or hour, no one knows, neither the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father» (Mark 13:32)?
It's
about the young
man who grew up loving both the Bible and science, but who was told faithfulness to Scripture required a literalist
interpretation of Genesis 1 and 2 and a rejection of the scientific consensus surrounding evolutionary theory.
Abraham looked up and saw three
men standing nearby (Gen 18:2 NIV)»... Furthermore, there is a good reason to study the old Orient, the rituals and cultures of the Middel East, especially at that time,,, i myself being Half Egyptian and having been raised there, am blessed with this foreknowledge for certain things that are still the same way now as they were at th etime of Jesus and earlier,,, where Men kiss to greet one another for example,,, so when King David talks about the love of Jonathan being greater than that of a woman,,, and at the same time knowing that the Hebrew litreature (as the Arabian culture to quite an extent still is) was very poetic and used éndless symbols and parabels to express an idea,,, one might do himself a favor not jumping to conclusions which satisfy only his very own ideas and thoughts,,, the biggest problem with Bible interpretations lately is Verses ripped out of the context and interpreted in such a way that has nothing to do with its original context... «To the law and to the testimo
men standing nearby (Gen 18:2 NIV)»... Furthermore, there is a good reason to study the old Orient, the rituals and cultures of the Middel East, especially at that time,,, i myself being Half Egyptian and having been raised there, am blessed with this foreknowledge for certain things that are still the same way now as they were at th etime of Jesus and earlier,,, where
Men kiss to greet one another for example,,, so when King David talks about the love of Jonathan being greater than that of a woman,,, and at the same time knowing that the Hebrew litreature (as the Arabian culture to quite an extent still is) was very poetic and used éndless symbols and parabels to express an idea,,, one might do himself a favor not jumping to conclusions which satisfy only his very own ideas and thoughts,,, the biggest problem with Bible interpretations lately is Verses ripped out of the context and interpreted in such a way that has nothing to do with its original context... «To the law and to the testimo
Men kiss to greet one another for example,,, so when King David talks
about the love of Jonathan being greater than that of a woman,,, and at the same time knowing that the Hebrew litreature (as the Arabian culture to quite an extent still is) was very poetic and used éndless symbols and parabels to express an idea,,, one might do himself a favor not jumping to conclusions which satisfy only his very own ideas and thoughts,,, the biggest problem with Bible
interpretations lately is Verses ripped out of the context and interpreted in such a way that has nothing to do with its original context... «To the law and to the testimony!
While this is evidently a move that suits Nagatomo, in that he will be able to play more before heading to Russia in June, the most plausible
interpretation of why this deal is happening from Inter's point of view concerns Javier Pastore, a
man Matt wrote
about here.
This isn't simply
about one
man's struggle with society but an astute, psychological character study that ambiguously treads a fine line between redemption and damnation while leaving us to question our
interpretation of events.
There's no telling whether or not his «
interpretation» of events had any bearing on the eventual vote, but it raises questions
about the
man's integrity.