Straw
man arguement maybe??
well, I sometimes bring some of those ways of thinking and operating to this blog... I do nt» mean to, it is almost like muscle memory... someone throws out a straw
man arguement or circular logic, or some other logical fallacy, and well... sometimes I jump at it the way I would over at other blogs without maybe taking a moment to re-adjust my attitude.
Unless of course you're simply engaging in another of your trademark straw
men arguements... although I would note that such does not preclude the simultaneous operation of a Morton's demon or of an ideology / fact barrier such as I mentioned a few days ago.
Not exact matches
There again Michael you are confusing Roman culture and Greek culture... there is not fact and verifiable to your claim only random hypothosis motivated by an emotional sinful culture to change Jesus» words... instead of proof texting take all the text together they all condition that marraige is between
man and woman... and unless you can have babies your
arguement is futile.
Paul S. «Then there is the creation of
man that has all of the neccesary proofs to (also)» Really, name the neccesary proofs; proof — evidence or
arguement establishing or helping to establish a fact or truth of a statement.
If your
arguement was valid, than the massacres of
men through history prove there is no God, then those massacres belong to mankind alone.
If, as Jeff and the study in question says, it's logical and fair that a married
man of any age expect / require monogamy from his partner but not from himself, and justify this, as per the
arguement: «most
men can have sex without emotional attachment» while «most women develop emotional attachment to their sexual partners.»
Haha, oh
man, I have that
arguement with myself EVERY TIME I'm picking out shoes online... I'm like, «Seriously Linda?
He commented that advocates of
man made global warming were trying to win the socialist / communist
arguement, lost with the fall of the wall, the liberation of the eastern Europe, all of it.
If, as Jeff and the study in question says, it's logical and fair that a married
man of any age expect / require monogamy from his partner but not from himself, and justify this, as per the
arguement: «most
men can have sex without emotional attachment» while «most women develop emotional attachment to their sexual partners.»