Sentences with phrase «man argument used»

A typical straw man argument used against wind power is: «No country can run on wind power because the wind doesn't blow all the time.

But the word «uncertainties» also appears in a straw man argument used by alarmists.

Not exact matches

As a participant in that 1998 Ramsey Colloquium, a longtime supporter of the cautious use of rights language, and a frequent critic of its misuses, I was moved by Reno's arguments to ponder whether the noble post — World War II universal human - rights idea has finally been so manipulated and politicized as to justify its abandonment by men and women of good will.

As a bangology scholar, I can assure all that men will use any excuse, reason, justifcation, argument or con to get in a young one's panties.

I haven't heard that argument used for movies since the early days of pornography when hard - core pictures were preceded by a warning from a man wearing a doctor's smock about the terrible things viewers were about to witness.

The Founders» Constitution is, in the editors» words, «an anthology of reasons and of the political arguments that thoughtful men and women drew from, and used to support those reasons» (I: xi) The «reasons» and «arguments» are those of the founding generation and of the works that the» founders read.

Having being on the receiving end of the «man - hater» comment more times than I can count, seeing it listed as number one — in the form of «I like white males so much I married one» — rubbed me the wrong way.Being called a man - hater is often unfairly used as a way to silence women and dismiss their arguments outright, which is troubling, especially when it happens in the midst of a theological discussion.

Men kill yes even atheists like Stalin, Mao, Poll Pot kill millions so your use of that argument is dead as are all the people killed by atheists.

To critics of biblical inerrancy, it sounds like we Christians are making the same argument as this man uses: Is this what we do with Scripture?

I have just recently spoken to a prominient leader within the evangelical community in Scotland about such and his use of rhetoric, and misrepresentation of others and their views by straw man arguments.

Using logic and reason, man can deduce by using various arguments that God exists, and what sort of God He mighUsing logic and reason, man can deduce by using various arguments that God exists, and what sort of God He mighusing various arguments that God exists, and what sort of God He might be.

In an earlier attack he argues that (for some reason) using the «if, then» argument (if torturing a man will held defend our troops, then we ought to torture him) to support the use of torture by government officials on our enemies, isn't legitimate, because (crazy logical leap) many interrogators say torture doesn't work -LRB-!?).

There is some intellectual dishonesty, congruence, and implicit condescension in Bill Nye's arguments which is quite the turn - off for me, a college student, looking up to this man and trying to learn the truth using the Socratic method.

One of the main arguments used by advocates of gay «marriage» is that the current definition of marriage (as pertaining exclusively to man and woman) breaches the principle of equality and thus discriminates against same sex couples.

C. S. Lewis» recognition of a fact - value dichotomy within an argument against ethical subjectivism in The Abolition of Man has no doubt contributed something to the frequency with which «values» is used by both Catholics and Protestants who want to defend «traditional values.»

And if we affirm that Jesus was true God and true man and believe that he rose bodily from the tomb, then logical consistency demands that we not use the Enlightenment's antisupernatural, deistic or naturalistic arguments against traditional views on the virgin birth, the miracle stories of the Bible, the presence of the Holy Spirit, the future return of Christ, prayer and others.

John Stott said that the most convincing argument, however, is not these sets of verses to be used in a proof text manner, but rather the single affirmation of heterosexual marriage to be found in Genesis 2:24 — «That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.»

«o noooooooes it can't be true!!!!!!»», he used a straw man argument.

And what's more, it looks to me as though the Christian Religion lifted out of this mental atmosphere becomes a fish out of water, and rationalistic arguments used against the sacraments and ministry, just as destructive of the Incarnation, in the hands, that is, of a man who would consent to be consistent.

Use any argument you want to justify, defend, or denounce those things man - made, but never bring the name of our Lord and saviour into the argument as a means to an end.

He condemns ho - mos - exuality even though it is a natural practice (feel free to disagree all you want, but that argument will go nowhere), and his idea of a good marriage is a 13 year old girl being given to a 40 year old man as payment for a land deal, with her bloody sheets being used as a receipt of a good deal, and if she isn't a vir - gin (she could have been ra - ped, or her hy - men could have burst while riding a horse or something) she is to be stoned to death on her parent's doorstep.

But if more and more people are willing to limit what a pregnant woman can do — and what Personhood USA says is an expectation for «parents to use their bodies to care for their children» — it seems as if an argument could be made that it's OK to limit what women and men can do for fun and for their livelihood once they become parents.

And the more you read conservative blogs, the more clearly you can see the logical fallacies, straw man arguments, and misrepresentations used to justify its deluded conclusions.

He was a lifelong Labour man and had regular arguments with my parents, but he got the post out whatever the weather and often used to give me a lift to school on the crossbar of his bike.

In closing arguments, prosecutors cited emails in which Percoco and Howe used the word «ziti,» saying the men borrowed it from the HBO mob drama «The Sopranos» to refer to bribes.

Federal prosecutors, bent on telling a story of public corruption, used cherry - picked evidence, untrustworthy witnesses and innuendo to build a case against former Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos and his son, Adam, lawyers for the men said in closing arguments yesterday.

Agnifilo used his closing argument to contrast Venditto with Singh, saying the former town supervisor was a content family man who «has everything he needs» while the one - time restaurant mogul was «not happy with where he is» and needed «to get somewhere else.»

I found this a useful and timely post and have used it today to respond to a man writing to me with the argument that CO2 is not a pollutant but a fertilizer.

Said no powerlifter, ever,) not to mention that fundamentally strength and endurance athletes tend to not have much in common, other than arguments over whether or not a squat suit and Chuck Taylors look any more or less ridiculous than men's neon booty shorts and black and yellow Kayanos.But there are plenty of reasons that some of you strength focused folks may be interested in distance running (which will be the example for cardio I'm using in this article).

And it was still a sly reference - you can't use the man's words to strengthen and give credence to your argument like that, failing to mention the context and intention behind them.

Covering an article from OKCupid that makes an argument using statistics that suggests men should consider dating older women.

She used the same played out, classic argument: «I want a man who can relate to me and understand the struggle.»

The flim - flam man uses the veneer of social science to disguise an agenda - driven or ill - conceived argument.

For example, if you were marketing a car, you would use different arguments to find a target audience of women than you would to men.

Many people are using this as an argument to suggest that the mystery man is lying.

My goal is to keep Dot Earth «the right room for an argument» — in the purest sense of the word as used in the amazing Monty Python sketch involving Michael Palin (Man) and John Cleese (Arguer):

Personally I have never used the volcano argument although it would be interestings to speculate their contribution vis a a vis man if Co2 does stick around for a thousand years...

Her point, it seems, is to show that in the cases of acid rain, CFCs, and environmental tobacco smoke, these men used the same argument: the science was uncertain, concerns were exaggerated, technology will solve the problem, no need for government interference.

Wilson constantly uses the «CO2 is a greenhouse gas that man is making and changing the climate» argument.

Newsweek Magazine first used the climate «tipping point» argument in 1975 to urge action to prevent man - made global cooling.

«Therefore they will regard consensus studies indicating that a large majority of published studies / relevant scientists agree that man is causing climate change and will use this information to support their arguments.»

That kind of argument has been used since almost two millennia «All men, except a few very ones who are very depraved and vicious, believe in the dogmas and myths of my community, which have been revealed centuries ago; hence my dogmas are true and my prophecies are undisputable».

You use that argument in your way but my view is that you do it using in that particular claim the straw man fallacy.

However, catastrophists have attempted to use these past temperature reconstructions to make the argument that temperatures were incredibly stable and low right up to the point that man has made them higher and less stable in the last 100 years.

Basically, the comments state that neither numbers 1 or 2 above are arguments any climate scientists are using and, further, just to demonstrate what a silly straw - man - erector I am, they were never used as proof of high climate sensitivity to CO2.

The basis for [Bodine's] argument appears to be that most lawyers don't use Twitter and that 40 % of the discussion on Twitter is mindless - as if the conversation among lawyers and local business leaders in the country club on men's golf day is that of complex legal matters.

One of the researchers, Alan Yu, wonders if men tend to compensate for a lack of confidence by using a «manlier» voice at oral argument.

Some people find that a benefit — one argument against Obamacare is that, say, young single men shouldn't have to pay «extra» for maternity coverage that they're not going to use, and with HSMs you may not have to — but, again, it's important to know what the tradeoff is between health insurance and HSMs.

Some of the best memes floating around social media at the moment are the escalating arguments of two gruff - looking motorcycle men on various topics like the Hobbits not using the Eagles to fly to Mordor, self - checkout frustrations and whether or not Garfield is actually good.