Sentences with phrase «man bear children»
It is not wise to pursue a goal of letting man bear children or training students to write equally with both hands.
https://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/ Not exact matches
But now gay men hire surrogates to bear children.
«There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.»
What is the real ignorance among African Americans is that the majority of their children are born out of wedlock, significant numbers of their men have taken a particular liking to prison, if white women have had to deal with the degree of lack of care and sympathy that black men have given to their responsibilities — they'd be angry too.
But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God» (St. John 1)
3) Repeated motif of animalistic and moronic men occurs: the bear - dressed mountain man, the animal - sound making outlaw, the mule - tormenting Indian children (inbreds?)
Luke 6:35 But love you your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing... John 13:35 By this shall all men know that you are my disciples, if you have... Ephesians 5:1 Be you therefore followers of God, as dear children; 1 John 3:9 Whoever is born of God does not commit sin; for his seed remains....
My verson reads» If men fight and hit a pregnant woman and her child is born prematurely, but there is no serious injury, he will surely be punished in accordance with what the woman's husband demands of him, and he will pay what the court decides.
The only delusion that occurs is when unregenerate man looks upon that born - again child of God and assumes he has lost his mind when in fact his mind and heart have been liberated.
It is why a company with a population with a lot of women of child bearing years has higher insurance costs than one that is primarily made up of men.
«If a man have two wives, one beloved and another hated, and they have born him children, both the beloved and the hated; and if the firstborn son be hers that was hated:» Deuteronomy 21:15
Yes, it is true that God made man for woman, but we humans who has been born for the short time we are here must not judge each other for our indifferences and beliefs; we must help each other dodge the evils of this world and come together as the children of God.
And bears eat children who question God's men (and question = derision = mocking God = you deserve to die, or whatever bad things might happen — and outside of your «covering» all bets are off, don'tcha know.)
Well the eunuchs born that way and those made eunuchs by other men are exempt from the requirement to get married and have children, so, therefore you must have decided to become «eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven» so line up and I will cut off your genitals!
We accept this pattern of human sexuality as a foundation for human society, and we celebrate the healthy relationships of mutual service that embody it» above all, the divinely ordained covenant of marriage between one man and one woman prepared to bear and rear each succeeding generation of children.
If one wants to create a people as numerous as the sand or the stars, one does not begin with Sarah, a barren woman well past child - bearing age, and Abraham, an old man whom God had commanded to scar his genitalia.
Even if the child is born of a mixed marriage between a Catholic man and a Jewish woman, and the child is baptized, and receives the sacraments, even Holy Orders.
If only born - again Christians go to heaven, then the piles of suitcases and bags of human hair displayed at the Holocaust Museum represent thousands upon thousands of men, women, and children suffering eternal agony and the hands of angry God.
Sexual relations outside the bonds of marriage between man and woman for mutual pleasure, consolation and child bearing are not allowed.
Sexual exploitation of the unborn, the new born and youth of both sexes, together with the fact that even free men and women were expected to marry (usually arranged) and bear and rear children as a duty to empire and family, meant for many Christians that the only route to personal liberty led through the «freedom» of celibacy.
Then Abraham fell on his face and laughed, and said to himself, «Shall a child be born to a man who is a hundred years old?
I will let Paul respond to your question: «And not only so, but also when Rebekah had conceived children by one man, our forefather Isaac, 11 though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad — in order that God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls — 12 she was told, «The older will serve the younger.»
Not only because it is Afro - Americans themselves, especially men, who now inflict these wounds upon themselves — through the ways they betray those who love them and bear their progeny, through the ways they bring up or abandon their children, through the ways they relate, or fail to relate, to each other, through the values and attitudes they cherish and the ones they choose to spurn, through their comforting ethnic myths about their neighborhoods, through their self - indulgences, denials and deceits — but because only they as individual men and women can find the antidote to heal themselves.
2/3 of African American babies are born out of wedlock, African - American men are absent while children are slaughtering each other on the streets, and and some African - American Pastors are concerned about Gay Marriage?
Equality, in this view, means that if men do not bear children, women should not have to either.
We may recall that Christianity is in the first instance a gospel, a proclamation, in which it is declared that the eternal Reality whom men call God has crowned His endless work of self - revelation to His human children by a uniquely direct and immediate action: He has come to us in one of our own kind, the Man of Nazareth, uniting to Himself the life which, through His purpose, was conceived and born of Mary, and through this life in its wholeness establishing a new relationship to Himself into which the children of men may enter.
Think «plagues», commandments to slaughter men, women and children, flooding the earth and murdering every living thing, save what fit on Noah's Arc..., murdering the first born of egyptians... because you know, they were certainly guilty of something.
T - party, yeah right; men were born to abuse women and parents were born to abuse children.
See John 20:30; Mark 16:17 - 20; John 2:11; Acts 2:22: («Ye men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know»); Acts 2:43: -LRB-»... and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles»); Acts 4:29 - 30: «And now, Lord, behold their threatenings: and grant unto thy servants, that with all boldness they may speak thy word, By stretching forth thine hand to heal; and that signs and wonders may be done by the name of thy hold child Jesus»); Hebrews 2:3 - 4: («How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him: God also bearing them witness, both with signs and wonders, and with divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost, according to his own will»); Romans 15:17 - 19: («I have therefor whereof I may glory through Jesus Christ in those things which pertain to God.
If a pitcher never becomes empty, if an old woman bears a child, if iron floats — these are miracles; if five thousand men are fed with five loaves and two fishes, if a sick man is healed by laying on of hands and a single word — these are miracles.
I did like the part about the two she - bears tearing apart the 42 children because they made fun of a bald man.
The roles of women, however, remained largely unchanged — bearing and rearing children, doing housework, and serving men.
Indeed, were we to finish the story of prototypical man and woman — which does not end with their expulsion from Eden but continues through the story of their children in the next chapter — we would discover immediately the dangers of woman's pride in her child - bearing powers and of jealous sibling rivalry to the point of fratricide.
The older teleological view measured morality against man's rational - animal nature; in the sexual realm, this meant evaluating sex acts by reference to the common good of marriage, which integrated spousal union and the bearing and rearing of children.
, «If a woman have conceived seed, and born a man child: then she shall be unclean seven days... But if she bear a maid child, then she shall be unclean two weeks...», «And if it be from a month old even unto five years old, then thy estimation shall be of the male five shekels of silver, and for the female thy estimation shall be three shekels of silver.»
But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
As the name «Sons of Jacob» implies, this is an effort to simulate a story from the Bible in a drastically different context, and Genesis 30:1 - 3 is even recited as these women are forced to bear children on the knees of the men's wives.
if a man and his wife went into slavery for debt together, they should go free together the seventh year, but if the man, entering bondage alone, was given his wife by his owner, even though children were born, only the man could go free; (Exodus 21:3 - 4.)
Is this your same logic you use when you help to put an end to Obama Care, yours are looked after soon to heck with the poors children let them die because they were stupid enough to be born to poor people, is this your idea of christian values, well they match the republician and tea parties ideology right down the line worship money loath things that help the common man... Very christian indeed!
They don't exactly have the same ring to them... and yet they are there, tucked between stories about animals and arks (and the mass destruction of mankind), burning bushes and plagues of locusts (and the death of first - born children), stairways to heaven and colorful robes (and men with multiple wives).
It was for this purpose also that God created man and woman: to multiply his image in the children born of their marital union.
Second, and more crucially, that secular objection (as in the hippie saying I heard so often in my youth: «Don't lay your value trips on me, man») rests on the assumption that someone can authentically sexually donate himself to another without making a definitive commitment to the other person; that is, he can «hedge his bets,» so speak, without paying the consequences ¯ a foolish assumption given the rates of sexually transmitted diseases, the divorce rates, the numbers of children born out of wedlock, and so forth.
Why has all authority on this issue been assumed by men who have not been assigned by biology to bear children or by history to rear them?
These references depict a society still in touch with its roots, old men and old women renewed in the shade of Jesse's ancient stock, their old frames, matured by godly fear and faith, now become the polished horn for the spirit's eloquence: «The people who have walked in the dark have seen a wonderful light... for unto us a child is born.»
We ought to understand, of any such incomprehensible moment of time, that the participants themselves would be unable to answer the question, «Exactly what happened»» The pursued were an ill - organized, virtually unarmed, and now panic - ridden column of walking men, women, children, flocks, bearing such conglomerate and awkward possessions as could not or would not be left behind.
LGBT activists seek to advance the idea that any limits on rights of «parenting» would be a violation of the principle of equality and thus an injustice, setting aside the fact that a child is always born of the union of a man and a woman — even if this union may sometimes be medically assisted.
LGBT activists seek to advance the idea that any limits on the rights of «parenting» would be a violation of the principle of equality and thus an injustice, thereby setting aside the fact that a child is always born of the union of a man and a woman — even if this union may sometimes be medically assisted.
Do you her men complaining about not being able to bear children?
In the most complex case, a child could be born with two fathers — the semen donor and the man who plans to rear the child — and three mothers — one for the egg, one for gestation and one to rear the child.
I am but a Pennsyvania born country man / child, raised with rabbits and chickens to be ate and sold off.