Since these forces are themselves fundamentally impersonal, their resultant in feeling and action can not be a person in the sense in which Hebrew
man came to understand himself.
Eventually,
man came to understand that despite how advanced our society became, there was little we could do to keep our world from being destroyed.
Not exact matches
Just
understand that not all of us atheists intend
to come off as condescending and mean; - We just don't see why you rely on beliefs that are probably just another set of
man - made beliefs.
Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly
come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell
to come together
to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down
to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of
man that it takes just that
to even consider it true.I
understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you
to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.
Marion expresses the theocentric
understanding of
man that he finds in St. Augustine: «Speaking
to God, as the confessing praise does, implies first of all turning one's face
to God so that he can
come over me, claim me, and call me starting from himself, well beyond what I could say, predict, or predicate of him starting from myself alone.»
We should continue
to share the word of the wisdom of the Lord
to every
man of this world till the end.for in the word is the
understanding of everything created by the almigthy, the word
comes with
understanding of the existance of the holyspirit which drives us into love, peace and harmony and great things will always be with us forever we will never be caugth on the wrong side.
Young
men recruited
to the pursuit are enabled
to come to a new
understanding of manhood.
The guy is educated but has shown he is completely clueless when it
comes to understanding to common
man / woman.
The most important message ever known
to man is one that should be heard and
understood by as many as possible so that as many as possible might
come to faith.
if I can not rely on the bible, what should I rely on, as god
come to earth and told
man any bible is correct, in my view, I think gave word
to more that one, and would like us
to make effort
to learn or try
to understand each
It is best
to first
understand the things Jesus said as God
came to us in the form of
man so that we could see by his example and life the full attributes of God.
Don't know how old she was that Musa married
to at... But
understand that females at hotter areas become ripe at earlier age and if body was built well enough and had her monthly period
coming early age than she is ready minimum 9 years old... There are still in some small cities, villages and remote areas families are having their daughters marrying at such age
to men that could reach upto 80 years old...!
Romney
understands that you teach a
man to fish he has abundant life, you give him a fish only, the one meal soon
comes to an end.
What I really don't
understand is how you ignore all the other sign in the bible that are
to tell of the end of days and believe a
man that has
come up with a mathematical equation!
What I see with religion is that it
comes from
man which Jesus warned you
to not get your
understanding from in Matt 16:13 - 20.
Here's the deal, Yes, it used
to be 28 billion years, now it's 14 billion but that's not on whims of scientists who just want
to screw with the common everyday
man, it's when certain evidence
comes to light and we have
to revise our
understanding.
He was given a choice
to say his last words — it's in a language I don't
understand (possibly a Middle Eastern tongue) but you can tell the
man has already gone through hell on Earth and knows the worst is yet
to come.
The truth is there is hatred, fear and ignorance when it
comes to white
men that live in white community's and there
understanding of black
men.
While employing the Hegelian categories of the «universal» and the «objective» as a means of
understanding the new reality created by modern
man, Kierkegaard
came to understand the modern consciousness as the product of a Faustian choice.
Man there are alot of women who are going
to be answering
to that dude for screaming his name... I'd say I pity them but if He actually does see and hear everything, I'm sure he will
understand... I've read the bible many times, I keep a copy in the bathroom, it
comes in handy anytime I eat at Juans roadside mexican cart, and i think I am about
to die.
In the Gospels the Son of
man is an individual person, but how literally his
coming in (or on) a cloud (or clouds) is
to be
understood is another question.
Men need
to come to understand that women can be at once conscious (and part of the morality debate) and good.
First, it must again be stressed that the eschatological message of Jesus, the preaching of the
coming of the Kingdom and of the call
to repentance, can be
understood only when one considers the conception of
man which in the last analysis underlies it, and when one remembers that it can have meaning only for him who is ready
to question the habitual human self - interpretation and
to measure it by this opposed interpretation of human existence.
Christ
came among
men with a simple ministry of teaching whose main purpose was
to confirm that the kinds of ways in which God had been
understood in Natural religion, and the very language used
to express those insights, were broadly right.
Subtly but profoundly these modified the initial ways of stating and apprehending the gospel; indeed we may well say that they gave a new depth
to the
understanding of Christ and his significance, and even a new content
to the original gospel itself, insofar as Christ
came to be interpreted in the light of the needs of
men and women
to whom he was being preached.
I suppose unless I'm already a believer I will need
to pay a believer a nice sum of money in order and take a class in order
to understand why a covenant that carries the penalty of death if this god is not worshipped is changed because, help me here (well of course unless god can speak for himself - I guess I have
to ask those who have studied his word that he gave only once 2000 years ago
to another culture), so after this covenant he
came down and became a
man in order
to give people grace so he doesn't kill them if they don't worship him?
All the hateful and ridicling of Christianity aligns with what JESUS said «As the days of Noah, so shall it be the
coming of the Son of
man» In case you do not have an
understanding of that quote, there were people mocking at Noah when he was instructed
to build the Ark (Which by the way has been discovered and proven
to have existed as written in the Bible).
It
came to expression in the myths in which
man tried
to understand his mysterious world and in the ritualistic practices by which he tried
to secure divine aid.
Spiritually
understood, is it conceivable that two such different
men could possibly be able
to come to the same place!
Marriages, of course, are only human; they go wrong and break down; but it is still within marriage, and the families that spring from marriage, that most people
come closest
to an
understanding of true love and creativity, which is as close as
man can get
to God.
If God was completly removed we would not have such an intellectual book
to even believe in... God can speak through
man and many predictions that were in the bible
came true already... How can
men that have no back grounds of science or physics and basic
understand of the world and how it works be able
to come up with half the stuff in the bible... Really hard
to come up with the figures when your just a fisherman or even a king... Only explains God even more
While
understanding the main point of the article, I wish
to add that, in my view, wise
men came to see baby Jesus about six months after His birth, at Passover time, not necessarily in Bethlehem, Jesus being in a house and not in a manger.
for every priest that violated his vows and the trust of his parishioners there will someday be a reckoning... true the head always suffers for his members that go astray... but the Brits don't
understand the Catholic church if they think that we are going
to accept practicing
man and females gays into the priesthood and except the pope
to issue condoms for the prevention of AID they got something else
coming... If the Brits want
to live in a perverse society where every thing goes that their moral problem!!
Today as i was thinking about Jesus sending the demons into the pigs and i thought God is not punishing but judging and he made a decision.This idea
came from your other discussion which i believe is what he does he decides
to make a judgement call he is sovereign and it shows his tender heart and mercy that not a single person was afflicted.The pigs unlike
men have no soul so have no eternal consequence upon them they live and they die.either way they were going
to get killed.We can be assured that Gods judgements are right and just the pork was going
to the gentile nations who worshipped other Gods and no doubt would have been offered
to idols so there is a consequence when we disobey the Laws of God even even when we do nt know or
understand his laws.brentnz
Gods
came to set the captive free.God is always in control he calls the shots not Satan he is in control his motives and purposes we can not
understand but we do know his character is always for good and he always has a plan.It is spiritual lesson from a real life situation.I am jumping way ahead here but at the time the people sent Jesus away the demoniac
man was sent back
to his family when you read later because of his testimony the next time they visit years later
to those towns many people are saved because of him so again yes some pigs died one
man was set free but that
man went and told his story and many were saved and added
to the kingdom so
to God be the glory.brentnz
To this final set of people, I would say that you must
understand that you
come from a place of privilege, especially if you are a cisgender heterosexual
man.
My question
to you gay marriage supporters, how can you support something that has no scientific evidence, (afterall, a fully bearded
man with a large penis, with all the testosterone in the world,
comes up
to say that hes gay) and instead of trying
to understand and correct this psyhcological anomaly, you applaud it and support it... why?..
That is
to say, the Greek spirit had not the courage
to assert that a
man knowingly does what is wrong, with knowledge of the right does what is wrong; so Socrates
comes to its aid and says, When a
man does wrong, he has not
understood what is right.
But the thing is this: with the years
man does not, spiritually
understood,
come to anything; on the other hand, it is very easy with the years
to go from something.
At the same time he was indicating very profoundly what God is «up
to» in the continual
coming to men and women which finds its climactic expression in the event of Jesus Christ, so far as Christian
understanding is concerned, although we dare not be so exclusive or uncharitable as
to rule out other ways for other people «who know not the Lord Jesus.»
If Jesus thus employed a familiar way of speaking, not just casually but in circumstances which made it the vehicle of a partly veiled assertion of his vocation, then «Son of
Man»
came to be something like a self - designation replacing the traditional title of «Messiah» That is how the writers of the gospels seem
to have
understood it.
The term «transfiguration,» or we might say «transformation,» points
to the process by which a phenomenon that is a part of ordinary experience
comes to assume a controlling interpretative role in
man's
understanding of himself and his world.
Now it is possible
to come to the Christian
understanding of
man's existence within the framework of philosophical terms and at the same time
to be speaking out of the mythical orientation.
But these findings are valuable in precisely those areas which most concern us if we seek the some sort of
understanding of the historical Jesus as we have
come to have of
man in general — an
understanding or image succinctly expressed in Dr. Dillistone's lecture: «This image is a «dynamic, temporal one that sees
man as first of all an agent, a self,» who stands self - revealed only in the midst of the density of temporal decisions.»
This makes it possible for us
to understand Christian worship as the culmination of all of
man's striving
to find a satisfactory way of integration with his God, completing and correcting the many attempts which may be seen as foreshadowings of the «good thing» which was
to come.
We need the wisdom from above
to understand things and not just
men's ideas that
come from their own exclusive club and act as gate
to that club.
There he refuted the Platonic doctrine of an immortal soul, maintaining that while
man is
to be
understood as the conjunction of two entities, body and soul, these both
came into existence simultaneously at the moment of conception.
He was strongly opposed
to the teaching of some of his Christian contemporaries who wished
to interpret the idiom of resurrection as an allegorical description of that Christian experience by which «a
man, having
come to the truth, has been reanimated and revivified
to God, and, the death of ignorance being dispelled, has as it were burst forth from the tomb of the old
man».35 Tertullian was adamant that the resurrection was in the future and
to be
understood in physical, fleshly terms («I pronounce that the flesh will certainly rise again»).36 In order
to forestall those who could contend the impossibility of such a hope on the grounds that the decayed corpse would have long since wasted away
to nothing, he pointed out that quite recently, in his city, skeletons some five hundred years old had been unearthed in a remarkable state of preservation.
But as
men became more and more aware of moral principles and as their thinking was «rationalized», the way in which the sacred was
understood, the way in which
men came to interpret the more - than - human, was in terms of love and of «persuasion» (as Whitehead put it), although it never lost the awesome quality which evoked from them worship and adoration.
If, however, Being or Reality
comes to expression in words, then the primary posture of
man is that of listener, concerned
to know the reality that
comes to understanding through words.