Perhaps the contradiction in his behaviour is born from the Christian belief that
man has power over animals as his dialogue makes reference to the slaves being comparable to baboons.
Dworkin views the power of men as a class issue: because men belong to the privileged class,
each man has power over every woman.
Not exact matches
In the BBC article, Eden King exposes a root cause of sexual harassment: «A belief that women are inferior to
men, the belief that
men should
have power over women,» and, she adds, a belief that «
men should be aggressors and women should be gatekeepers.»
But your right I'm sure this
has been going on since the first
man put on a robe and claimed spiritual
power over other people 1000's of years ago.
«Well aware that the opinions and belief of
men depend not on their own will, but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to their minds; that Almighty God
hath created the mind free, and manifested his supreme will that free it shall remain by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments, or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, who being lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his Almighty
power to do, but to extend it by its influence on reason alone; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired
men,
have assumed dominion
over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others,
hath established and maintained false religions
over the greatest part of the world and through all time.»
Do
men have more
power over women or do women
have more
power over men.
Through it
man has abandoned himself into the eternal absolute
over which he
has no
power.
It is a dangerous thing to deny the presence of evil spirits in the world, but it is equally dangerous to think that
man, by the performance of some ritual,
has some
power over them.
Out of the ruins, once more, God
would raise up those who should truly serve and obey him; and this divine Rule was to be inaugurated — so Mark and his fellow Christians believed — when the Son of
Man, who was identical with Jesus crucified, raised from the dead, and exalted to heaven, should return on the clouds to hold the Last Judgment, when he should come «in
power» with the angels of God to reign with his elect
over a renewed earth.
Anyone who uses religion or ethnic cleansing as an excuse to
have power and dominion
over thier fellow
man like Iran, Pakistan, and the Sudan does internally and through importing terror through the likes of aL - Qaeda, Hezbollah or the Janjaweed.
Man was free from his own past, because the Spirit placed him on a new level of existence in which that past
had no
power over him.
The
man has become a noble
man, who leaves to receive some sort of royal
power over subjects.
Some
have supposed that he changed God's attitude toward
man or effected some alteration in the
power of evil
over the world.
Tommy God
has already forgiven you for your sin the moment you asked Jesus into your life and confessed him as Lord.From that point he paid for your sin in full past present future.It is not sin that stops us from being with the Lord so you are saved.The problem you are experiencing is the battle for your life in the here and now satan is out to destroy you and he knows our weaknesses.If you are honest there were already issues in your life that you struggled with and never got the victory
over.So where do you go from here as i found myself in the same situation i was a christian but walking according to the flesh.God does nt change his mind he always loves us but because of our choices we distance ourselves from God.The issue is that we like sin thats our wicked hearts and to be fair we cant change our nature only Christ can do that our old nature must be crucified with Christ.The stumbling block is our pride we
have to admit that we cant do it For me that was terribly difficult i was so independent thinking i could do anything but the truth was a made a real mess of things.I sense you are at a crossroads and are feeling desperate and confused.So as a brother in the Lord you need to confess your sin to God and tell him that you are weak -LCB- we all are -RCB- and that you cant do it in your strength -LCB- None of us can -RCB- but ask him to send the holy spirit to help you deal with the temptations and the sin that you struggle with and he will help you to change your life he will empower you as he did me.Rather than look at who you are look to Christ and walk in him and he will make you a new
man and sin will not
have dominion
over you.Jesus came to set us free from bondage.Having once been a slave to sin i know what it is like to
have been set free by the
power of God and that is what Christ is offering you today.All it takes is a desire to change or repent and admit we cant do it and trust him to give you the strength to walk in him regards brentnz
However, today those hostile to modernity
have argued that Western
power leads only to the mastery of some
men over others.
How ironic that you
would post «The reason 90 % of the entire membership does not agree with Kate Kelly is because she paints the Priesthood as a
power that
man have over women.
But as Bill maher once said: «I could believe in the Bible if it
would mention one of the following words: electricity, nuclear
power, computer, laser and evolution... Instead the god in the OT kills
over 2 million
men, women and children for being disobedient or collecting sticks on a Sabbath.
Although biology and psychology recognize that
man is a highly dependent being, that does not mean that he
has been handed
over to
powers outside of and distinct from himself.
The scientist, like the doctor,
has power over the life and well - being of
man, and so, it is argued, the public is particularly vulnerable to his code of ethics.
Man chose satan as their god and
have had the chance to show what they could do without their creator and his ideas, principles and laws but it
has not been pretty and as Jesus taught that satan is «The ruler of this world», «the god of this system» etc.but for «a little while longer» and the Creator will take his wisdom, justice,
power and love and take
over to show what was intended from the beginning.for scriptures (see 1 John 5:19, Rev. 12:9 - 12, Luke 22:31, Matt.25: 41, 1 Pet.5: 8,9, John 8:44,45) and so many others for those who care.
I
have been told (by female leaders) that there is a «real concern
over my insensitivity», that they were talking to me in a particular way because «
men have the
power and that I am speaking to you prophetically because that is how God deals with things by adressing the
men first».
Turning away from orthodox Christianity because of the emotional excesses of frontier evangelism, he found it easier as a young
man to accept what was called the Doctrine of Necessity, which he defined as the belief â $ ˜that the human mind is impelled to action, or held in rest by some
power,
over which the mind itself
has no control.â $ ™ Later, he frequently quoted to his partner, William H. Herndon, the lines for Hamlet: â $ ˜Thereâ $ ™ s a divinity that shapes our ends, rough â $ «hew them how he will.â $ ™ â $ œFrom Lincolnâ $ ™ s fatalism derived some of his most lovable traits: his compassion, his tolerance, his willingness to overlook mistakes.
The growth of modern scientific civilization
has brought both opportunities and perils for democracy: opportunities in the vast new resources made available to mankind, and perils in the increased
power men can use against and
over one another.
No one, Jew or Gentile,
would have been taken aback at a statement that the
power of God is greater than
men; Paul's scandalous proposition is that the weakness of God reveals His true
power, including the
power to triumph
over sin and death.
Israel, however, was not beast but «son of
man,» the people of the one true God; Israel alone
had incarnated Yahweh's purpose and at a definite date in the future
would sweep into world
power over the ruins of the fallen heathen realms.
I am no Scholar but, I believe God
has the
power to change prophecy the way that he did with Hezekiah, his intentions for a perfect people in the beginning changed due to disobedience so who's to say our
men or intended leadership
has overall been disobedient, and many women
have been forced to lead and in that leading women
have been more obedient.We all need each other if my husband was a pastor and I'm his help mate if he for some reason can't teach or preach who else other than myself
would be the closest to him.I don't believe GOD changes he's always the same but, he does
have the
power to make changes and he does not need our permission to do so, instead of debating back and forth
over our version of the Bible we should be sure we
have the Holy Spirit and real relationship with GOD because he will reveal to us his truths but, please know he's not the author of confusion
«If [the president]
has that
power, which is really the
power of life and death
over the human family, then obviously that
power has to be watched with the greatest vigilance and skepticism — including the psyche of the
man who uses it.»
Although Christ was filled with the form of God and rich in all good things, so that he needed no work and suffering to make him righteous and saved (for he
had all this eternally), yet he was not puffed up by them and did not exalt himself above us and assume
power over us, although he could rightly
have done so; but, on the contrary, he so lived, laboured, worked, suffered, and died that he might be like other
men and in fashion and in actions be nothing else than a
man, just as if he
had need of all these things and
had nothing of the form of God.
Since the start of
man, people
have also killed
over land,
power and so on, so it's not just religion; though people typically
have an easier time believing some crazy person's claim that they represent their faith in their violent acts... somehow?
Man also
has been given
power over nature, our second position.
In my writing, which Colson professes to
have followed «
over the years,» I affirm in many places that
man has a spiritual soul not reducible to matter, one that is conferred on him directly by God and is responsible for his spiritual
powers of intellect and will.
There are
men who
have power — there are mayors
over cities, police commissioners, United States marshals, governors; there are legislators, both in the Senate and Congress; there are members of various courts and cabinets.
So to blame the «masculinity crisis» on the few women who
have managed to ascend to significant leadership positions in the Church in recent years, especially when
men continue to dominate the field, grossly overstates the amount of
power women
have over the institution and turns them into unnecessary scapegoats.
This theme is the Lord's astounding victory
over Pharaoh, the latter
having at his disposal all the wealth, all the
power, all the resources that
man, earth, the world, and his Egyptian gods could create.
Now when [many] others came in crowds about him, for they were very greatly moved [or pleased] by hearing his words, Herod, who feared lest the great influence John
had over the people might put it into his
power and inclination to raise a rebellion, (for they seemed ready to do any thing he should advise,) thought it best, by putting him to death, to prevent any mi - schief he might cause, and not bring himself into difficulties, by sp - aring a
man who might make him rep - ent of it when it
would be too late.
In some churches, where the minister
has traditionally been a strong, dominant figure with significant
power and influence
over all decisions affecting the church, many
men feel extremely threatened by a woman holding that degree of
power and influence
over church life.
I do not wish them to
have power over men, but
over themselves.
Women
have power, great
power,
over men.
It may not be polished literature, it may not be learned writing, but judged by its
power over the minds and hearts of successive generations of
men and women of many races, it
would be difficult to give it a lower classification.
The board
has no
power over Wenger, and he is his one
man show.
Your
powers have been removed and handed
over to Modern, professional, forward thinking experts in Sven and Raul.If you can't see that you are the Dead
Man Walking then you really
have lost what's left of your decrepit old mind.
This allowed the Palace
man to hit it
over the wall accurately without much
power, and not
have to worry about the 27 - year - old getting a hand to it.
Skipper John Terry
had claimed player
power had not played a part in Thursday's decision to axe the Portugese but Fabregas and Costa's names were booed by large parts of the home support before the action started, while Chelsea fans were soon singing in support of a
man who led them to three league titles
over two spells.
Gazidis warned that the new
man will not
have any of the sole
power over transfers and recruitment that Wenger
had.
Meanwhile,
men's posts reinforce hegemonic norms — they're stronger,
have more
power over and are the caretakers / providers of their wives, maintaining the «institutional dominance of
men over women.»
Women
have that
power over most
men but not
over guys like me.
Despite the row
over Welsh income tax between David Jones and Andrew RT Davies, both
men agree that there should be a referendum on giving the Welsh Government income tax raising
powers - and that the Conservatives
would campaign in favour.
Checks show that in the absence of the three
men, the
power of state ought to
have been provisionally handed
over to the Chief Justice, Georgina Theodora Wood, who [constitutionally] is the fourth in the line of succession to the Presidency — in the absence of the President, the Vice President and the Speaker of Parliament.
Under that iteration, Klein played a role in the budget talks — the so - called «three
men in a room» grew to four — and
had veto
power over which bills come to the floor.
But it was also bigger than the two
men running: it was the distillation of a struggle
over where the seat of
power would reside in the 13th Congressional district.