Sentences with phrase «man he speaks way»

What a talent, so calm and composed and for such a young man he speaks way beyond his years.

Not exact matches

«I hate that I even have to think that way, but I literally will walk into a meeting pretending I am some 56 - year - old white man, in a suit — you just speak differently.

This interaction, which I witnessed earlier this week, ended without incident — the cops went on their way and the men continued on their commute — but the mild hostility speaks to a nationwide problem.

Broadly speaking, it describes the way unconscious generalizations about people («men are better leaders») lead people to ignore objective reality («these women are outscoring most of the men on the leadership test»).

It is like saying there is not smoke with out fire, like sighting a droppings and trail of foot prints you would realize that a camel and passenger passed the desert then the seeing of the greatness of the mountains and passages through them, the seas great waves the skies it helps to realize the existence of super power «GOD» above all... any way it is like the verses written in the Quran «GOD «Allah speaking about how he had created earth to man by the mountains, seas and rain from skies which brings life to earth..

The leaders claim to speak for «God» when all they do is rehash archaic MAN MADE dogma attributed to a «God» who more closely resembles man's feeble mind and violent nature rather than the other way arouMAN MADE dogma attributed to a «God» who more closely resembles man's feeble mind and violent nature rather than the other way arouman's feeble mind and violent nature rather than the other way around.

But until we come to the end of ourselves then we are going to do and say what we want, even as it was with me: It's one thing to be a heathen, even as I was, but a whole other ball game to set our hearts on God and His truth; yet, that can only come when we are sick and tired of being sick and tired of our own lives and we just give up, we know then who has given up by the one they advocate for, even has given place to: Paul said; with my heart I want to do what is right, but my flesh does what I hate: This is when God's grace is sufficient, because our hearts are right with God, but our flesh is not: There is a war going on within these temples, therefore; even as our flesh wins out to do what we hate, our hearts are set on God and His ways which has been established in the Word of Truth, which then causes us to stand and speak forth what we believe, even as this causes a rending to happen within us, for Christ to be formed in us this needs to be, as we come up in His glories even for a better resurrection for them who believe: The heart wars against our flesh, even as Christ wars against the man of sin within: For out of the abundance of our hearts our mouth doth speak, therefore; if we speak not the Wholesome Words of our Lord, Then our hearts are still wicked: But to advocate for wickedness instead of Christ, one has become a teacher of lawlessness, he then advocates for the man of sin: Many who have come out of religion has done this, as they went from one mountain top «from the extreme right» of self exaltation (Religion) to the other mountain top «to the extreme left» of the (Heathen) and missed the valley in - between that is takes to humble us: One extreme to the other, and missed Jesus: Jesus is taking ones through the valley's to strip us down of all who we are before exalting us to be just as He, even as the Christ in us overcomes that man of sin (Adam) through theses valleys of contrast that cause a rending to happen within; and when we are rent in two, we stand on His word of truth, so we too can become one with Him, even as Jesus is with our Father: This is how Christ is formed in us: Thank - you Father; in Jesus Name Alexandria

Speaking for myself, although the same would be true for most of the others, I was working within a broadly Augustinian way of thinking about these matters» a tradition that sharply distinguishes between the city of God and the city of man, and insists that the one can never be transformed into the other.

Perhaps some judge her in an inappropriate way: But also remember the Scripture: «If I say to the wicked man, you shall surely die; and you do not warn him or speak out to dissuade him from his wicked conduct so that he may live: that wicked man shall die for his sin, but I will hold you responsible for his death.»

There are some ways He can speak through a woman He can not speak through a man.

I wish more Catholic women wold speak out like this to show support for Obama's law, instead of letting the men do all the talking for them, the way it's been since the middle ages.

By the way Naomi if you truly understand the bible you would no women have no right to speak of spiritual matters to men.

This gets into philosophy - of - law issues, of course, but even some imaginable judicially restrained economic - autonomy - is - Locke's - teaching scholars (i.e., really none of the libertarian con - law scholars I know of) would be advocating a way of life, and a pattern of regular legislation, that centered one's practice of liberty upon, well, business - man, or to speak Republic book VIII, oligarchic - man, accomplishments.

I don't believe in man made religion or any religion at all, but I do believe that the Bible is the Word of God and the way He has spoken to me through the Bible is reason enough for me to believe in it no matter what people say.

if he had not done what no other man had done, pharisees would have snored their way through his brief journey on the earth he spoke into existence and our pharisees would have to find something else over which to conduct pity parties

When wisdom enters your heart, and knowledge is pleasant to your soul, discretion will preserve you, understanding will keep you to deliver you from the way of evil, from the man who speaks perverse things Proverbs 2:10 - 12.

God reveals Himself to man in different ways in different ages but in our dispensation, He has spoken us through His son.

But on the other hand, we must be willing to take the risk of finding for the gospel new ways of expression which will speak directly and vividly to the hearts of men in this age.

But God has been speaking in secular ways to men and women through the ages; he has led them into more of the truth about the structure and functioning of the world in which they live; he is at work in the areas of human study, explorations research, and enquiry, which have given us this «new» world.

It has said that the whole experience of man in its every phase — from the genius of the artist and scientist and poet and thinker, to the commonplace life of the family and the daily round of the office and shop and school, not to speak of nature and its beauty, its regularity, its predictability, its reliability — is all in its way and in its degree a means for the divine self - revelation.

Together with the opening line of the Letter to the Hebrews («In ancient times God spoke to man through prophets and in varied ways, but now he speaks through Christ, His Son...»), as well as many other biblical texts, this passage reveals to us a startling truth.

I believe Paul's famous letter could also read this way: If I speak in the tongues of men or of angels, but do not have God, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal.

Thus — speaking as a Christian — I say that while I can not call violence good, legitimate, and just, I find its use condonable (1) when a man is in despair and sees no other way out, or (2) when a hypocritically just and peaceful situation must be exposed for what it is in order to end it.

Lilith did speak out Gd's hidden name and was wisked away to God's presence and did become God's wife and goddess until even God could no more take her mindedness ways so God did punish her for desires to be above all men and even God, Lilith did bcome as a curse to all the families young children.

The man who does not know freedom in Christ can not understand the word of freedom Paul spoke in the midst of necessity: «We are afflicted in every way, but not crushed; perplexed, but not driven to despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed» (II Corinthians 4:8 - 9).

Like Professor MacKinnon in his Easter meditation, I based my sermon on the assumption that there was an objective Easter event, and that it was this event which produced the dramatic change in the outlook of the disciples; that to speak of «Easter» is not a way of describing the disciples» growing conviction that Jesus had been right after all; but that it was only because something real and objective and totally unexpected had actually happened at Easter that the disciples became changed men.

F. C. Happold, for example, in his Religious Faith and Twentieth - Century Man, published in 1966, spoke of the mystical «as as a way out of the spiritual dilemma of modern man.&raqMan, published in 1966, spoke of the mystical «as as a way out of the spiritual dilemma of modern man.&raqman.»

= NO Book of Jasher tells us that all the men who walked in the ways of the Lord died in those days, before the Lord brought the evil upon man which he declared, for this was from the Lord, that they should NOT see the evil which the Lord spoke of concerning the sons of men.

No man speaks for God... IN NAY WAY or WITH ANY BOOK... PERIOD.

They may not lead men in any way and may not speak to any group if any men or older boys are present.

Jud 1:14 It was also about these men that Enoch, in the seventh generation from Adam, prophesied, saying, «Behold, the Lord came with many thousands of His holy ones, Jud 1:15 to execute judgment upon all, and to convict all the ungodly of all their ungodly deeds which they have done in an ungodly way, and of all the harsh things which ungodly sinners have spoken against Him.»

We are called to be light and salt, and one way to do this is to stand up and speak out FOR BIBLICAL VALUES and against sin... yes, of course we should be preaching / teaching / living God's «theology of marriage» in our own marriages...... but God has clearly defined marriage as between one man and one woman, and therefore, when our government says it's otherwise, we should be light and salt and speak up, and vote accordingly.

And in discussing this very situation, Professor Keiji Nishitani was quite unwilling (on a Zen basis) to allow one to speak of the mind of man as «including» the object of thought, i.e., the rock, in a way superior to that rock itself.

But the word can be spoken and heard in the authentic experience of reconciliation, and it stands in the language of the Gospel as the Word of God clothing itself in human speech and opening the way for the language of redemption to be spoken between God and man.

A debate in which the thoughts are not expressed in the way in which they existed in the mind but in the speaking are so pointed that they may strike home in the sharpest way, and moreover without the men that are spoken to being regarded in any way present as persons; a conversation characterized by the need neither to communicate something, nor to learn something, nor to innuence someone, nor to come into connexion with someone, but solely by the desire to have one's own self - reliance confirmed by making the impression that is made, or if it has become unsteady to have it strengthened; a friendly chat in which each regards himself as absolute and legitimate and the other as relativized and questionable; a lovers» talk in which both partners alike enjoy their own glorious soul and their precious experience — what an underworld of faceless spectres of dialogue!

At the end of the day though, these evil men in no way represent atheism, or communism the way hitler or more recently Brevick in Scandanavia doesn't speak for christians.

This is commonly enough recognized in a way, and in a way it is commonly affirmed; but the decisive affirmation comes only when a man is brought to the utmost extremity, so that humanly speaking no possibility exists.

For example, he said that man's fall is locatable in no historical Garden of Eden, but it is a way of speaking profoundly about what has happened in every man's experience.

The man and woman faced each other land spoke of their pain and failure, and of the seemingly inexorable nature of their separation; of loneliness and the need to learn new ways of relating; and of the sense of death, which both were experiencing.

If Jesus thus employed a familiar way of speaking, not just casually but in circumstances which made it the vehicle of a partly veiled assertion of his vocation, then «Son of Man» came to be something like a self - designation replacing the traditional title of «Messiah» That is how the writers of the gospels seem to have understood it.

And if I have encouraged just one man to speak up rather than hiding in aocohol, or violence to himself or others, isoloting himself or other ways of unhealthy coping then i will have done a service in what I am shring.

People are often jealous that Moses spoke to God as a man speaks to a friend, but the fact of the matter is that Jesus has enabled all people to speak to God in this way!

not judging you or anyone vow to fight if you truly are a man of GOD truth would be spoken not the devious way you and the church handled it im more of a man than you will ever be guess you are afraid of losing all those members and money.

So now let us talk of doing all, and speak of the men who, in this or that way, are assigned to the external world as to a stage.

As for this article and anyone who speaks Christian, Jesus said of those who speak and act in such a way to be seen of men (and impress them) «they have their reward.»

This is why we have chosen to write and speak solely in accordance with God's judgments and Yehvah's condemnations, as it is written, not the ways of man, but of Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior.

Speaking of Jesus in this way may seem to make him merely one of many great men, exceptional but not superhuman, not the divine being he is believed by Christians to be; but however his person and nature are understood, I for one can not believe that even in him God acted in any way inconsistent with the same natural laws and operations by which he works today.

When applied to God in human discourse, they are simply anthropomorphic representations of him, necessary in order that man have a way of thinking and speaking about the deity.

That significance lies in the undeniable fact that the God who «made known his ways unto Moses, his acts unto the children of Israel,» revealed himself as a concrete reality afresh in and through the words of this man, who «spoke as never man spoke.»

Indeed, his having so spoken of the Son of Man and of himself would virtually assure that the early church would think of him in that way.