Not exact matches
Paying homage to the comics Other
than cashing in on video games — the LEGO Batman games are leading Activision Blizzard's (Nasdaq: ATVI) The Amazing Spider -
Man on the charts as of this writing — it isn't yet clear how Warner will make good on this
freedom.
Twenty weeks after
freedom the
men had gained an average of 50 % more body fat
than when they began the study.
More
than 100 years ago, Dostoyevsky wrote: «Money is coined liberty, and so it is ten times dearer to the
man who is deprived of
freedom.
As Sullivan puts it, there is «more likely to be a greater understanding of the need for extramarital outlets between two
men than between a
man and a woman; and again, the lack of children gives gay couples greater
freedom.»
No, it's more
than anything, chick fil A chains» religious
freedom to donate for its belief on marriage definition, that it should be between a
man and a woman..
Ten years after his holy death on April 2, 2005, Karol Wojtyla, Pope St. John Paul II, looms even larger
than he did when the world figuratively gathered at his bedside a decade ago: tens of millions of
men and women around the world who felt impelled, and privileged, to pray with him through what he called his «Passover» — his liberation through death into a new life of
freedom in the blazing glory of the Thrice - Holy God.
It is true enough that the Almighty foresees how
man will act; but this foresight is nothing other
than divine knowledge of the
freedom of choice, which is a natural law.
When we apply this position to Diem's original criticism of Käsemann, that the latter presented Jesus as only teaching general truths rather
than the kerygma, it becomes clear that Diem has overlooked the crucial point: Käsemann went beyond the view that Jesus taught God's fatherhood and
man's
freedom, to the assertion that «God has drawn near
man in grace and requirement,» and Jesus «brought and lived the
freedom of the children of God».
The particular mechanisms employed depend on circumstances of history, geography, and culture, and decisions about them can be made responsibly only by taking account of
man's acquisitive propensities, his need for rational order, his longing for
freedom, and his sense of justice — in short, by relying on an integral rather
than a truncated conception of human nature.
The Barefoot Lawyer: A Blind
Man's Fight for Justice and
Freedom in China by chen guangcheng henry holt, 352 pages, $ 30 A nnihilating a civilization that has withstood more famines, invasions, peasant revolts, civil wars, and tyrants
than historians can keep straight takes work.
For what exhilarates us human creatures more
than freedom, more
than the glory of achievement, is the joy of finding and surrendering to a Beauty greater
than man, the rapture of being possessed.
It is often said that women know this communicative dimension in sex more intuitively and deeply
than men, and this is one reason for the male's relative
freedom from psychic scars in casual sexual experience.
To the extent that the
man - made setting of
man's life and the setting which was naturally antecedent to human
freedom are specifically different, the latter being characteristic of earlier times and the former of the present, we are now living in a setting which almost in its very essence is more complicated and intractable and inaccessible to the understanding of the individual
than was ever the case before.
What it proposes is akin to the existentialist search for radical
freedom for
man, and the acceptance of the risks of being; but process philosophy is closer
than existentialism to the classical philosophies in its search for an intelligible metaphysics.
The kind of action from social awareness that is demanded by perfect love is such as must admit the tragic reality that there are people who are genuinely intent upon using their
freedom to destroy the
freedom of others, and that, under certain circumstances, love itself may dictate that «It is better that many should die prematurely
than that nearly all
men should live in a permanent state of hostility or slavery» (MVG 173).
Sin grows out of
man's present
freedom rather
than a prehistoric event of the past.
It is no more
than the faith that the major obstacles to justice and
freedom and peace among
men can be overcome and that when they are overcome, there will be no danger of falling back into the darkness of earlier periods.
This heritage holds that
man is more
than «a larger white rat or a slower computer «16 — his
freedom, awareness, valuing, caring, and creativeness constitute the core of his humanness.
True, Scripture presupposes rather
than enlarges on
man's
freedom of choice, and its explicit theme, especially in the New Testament, is the paradox that
man's continuing responsible
freedom is enslaved by the demonic powers of sin and death and even by the law, and that it must be freed to the love of the law by the grace of God.
Secondly, genuine
freedom is the will to truth, because this frees every
man from those interior dangers which threaten
freedom more
than all external restrictions, the dangers of one's own shortsightedness, of pride and a blinding egoism.
One thing seems to be noteworthy: even the true
freedom of choice, that is the
freedom which consists not only in the absence of external compulsion but in the fact that
man must freely decide about himself, and which is, therefore, a demand rather
than «
freedom» — this
freedom becomes evident only in Christianity, because only there each individual is eternally valid (in the personal love between God and
man) and hence must realize himself in perfect responsibility and thus in
freedom.
In this situation, for God to tell the
man to use a given path rather
than another is indeed to destroy the
man's
freedom of choice.
That
freedom of conscience is sacred, that the believer has no more rights
than the non-believer, that
man has no more rights
than woman, etc?
For what this truly and blessedly means is that God can not be less
than man, endowed with personality,
freedom und love, and that the mystery itself is free protective love, not an «objective order» which one can, after all, possess (at least in principle), and against which one could ensure oneself.
Although there was more personal
freedom in the Low Countries
than in the rest of Europe, the establishment of the United States of America was new for the rights of
man, sui generis, an exemplar of
freedom.
It is quite wrong to talk about the «
freedom of
man», as if humanity is a single being, rather
than recognise that one person's
freedom is another person's bondage.
Using the same tools as van Buren, he has declared for overt atheism rather
than the death of God, and also, with Feuerbach, has chosen the historical fate of
man and his
freedom in this world, to salvation and the next.
The US is a secular country not a christian country.Our country was founded on the principles of
freedom fo religion and seperation between church and state.I am a muslim, I can tell you that the reason
men and women don; t pray in integrated environments is to avoid distractions and to focus on the prayer not because women are less
than men.I personally don; t want to be praying next to a woman because all I'll be thinking about is her and not god.Jews also do the same thing in temples by seperating between
men and women in temples.A house of worship is built solely for that purpose, worship!
Naturalism, therefore, leads to frustration and despair because
man in his
freedom (whereby he transcends nature) must commit himself to something greater
than himself.
«We're extremely proud of the
men and women who fight for our
freedom, and we couldn't think of a better way to honor them
than with a hearty breakfast made with America's favorite potato!»
I agree he doesn't care about the fans feelings Mainly because of his job security He has a huge salary,
freedom to be in charge of different areas within the club, no pressure other
than making the top 4 (although he would not be fired we finished outside) He also has «Yes
Men» under him or he simply ignores them.
players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets
than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor
man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more
freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up
man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes
i really like sanchez to stay with but if he wants to leave he should think twice about it and not forget where we rescued him from at barca also there are not many other footballing sides better suited to his game
than arsenal may be
man city but there he would have to play the way guardiola wants him to and wouldn, t have the same
freedom he enjoys with us and for sure wouldn, t be the main
man, he needs to ask some of former players for advise.
all the managers you mentioned will surely be able to help us achieve
than what this stupid old
man is doing.at least they will bring us the
freedom from thought that «in Arsenal there is no life without wenger», is that not what you and people like you think?
When asked about what was important to them about a job, women were more likely
than men to say they wanted fewer working hours and flexibility whereas
men were more likely to say they wanted higher pay and the
freedom to take risks.
Tens of thousands of
men and women in more
than 127 countries are now enjoying lasting
freedom from candida infection symptoms they never believed they could have.
More important
than anything, though, is the need for the central conflict, represented by the battle between
freedom and control, between justice and authority, between Captain America and Iron
Man, to feel genuine and earned.
As Solomon adopts his new name and role as Platt, he holds onto hope — however tucked away in a dark corner it must remain; hope that someday he'll be reunited with his family, hope that one day he'll meet a white
man who wants more for his
than a closed mouth and fast working hands, hope for
freedom.
Will Wolfie, a nearby alpha who's more wolf
than man, be a stumbling block in Terra's quest to maintain her
freedom?
I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward
freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to «order»
than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: «I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can not agree with your methods of direct action»; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another
man's
freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a «more convenient season.»
You're moving inexorably forward, so you can never stop (closer to Pac
Man than Geometry Wars), but you have 360 degree
freedom of movement (more like GW
than PM).
Building on the long history of faith leaders taking an active role in reproductive health care, the Clergy Advocacy Board has been working with Planned Parenthood at the national and state levels to further the goal of full reproductive rights and
freedom for all women and
men for more
than two decades.
In Egypt,
men and women are more likely to adhere to traditional gender roles, and
men are given significantly greater authority, respect, and
freedom of choice
than women (Sanders, 1986; Yount & Agree, 2004).