When a company's
management pays a dividend to its shareholders, its a serious commitment as the company tends to give regular (increasing) dividends in future.
Not exact matches
When a company generates a profit,
management has one of two choices: 1) They can either
pay it out
to shareholders as a cash
dividend or 2) retain the earnings and reinvest them in the business.
The discipline required
to consistently
pay a
dividend also has a way of discouraging
management from wasting
shareholder money on quixotic empire building or on overpriced mergers that fail
to deliver value.
Although these are generally small -
to medium - cap companies, certain large caps have also decided not
to pay dividends in the hopes that
management can provide greater returns
to shareholders through reinvestment.
Paying a
dividend year in and year out forces
management to be conservative, efficient, and responsible with
shareholders» cash.
I routinely scan for
dividend increases because that tells me the company has the cash necessary
to pay shareholders a rising stream of cash, and
management is confident about future prospects.
But even if that's not the case the company is very cheap based on both book value and cash flows, and best off all
management is incentivized
to create
shareholder value, is
paying a big
dividend and buying back stock.
«Why is it that from the date of the company's IPO in March 2007, through the end of 2011, cumulative
management and incentive fees
paid by Tetragon
to Polygon, at $ 300 million plus, exceeded cumulative
dividends distributed
to Tetragon
shareholders by almost 50 %».