As John O'Sullivan's timely Slaw post «
Juries and the Internet» makes clear, unless we take measures to address how much
information and at what level of detail we are comfortable placing in public view in the first place, we may be faced with situations that call for extraordinary, and potentially troubling, measures to
manage information later on.
Other important goals include developing / evaluating technologies that will assist in
managing: paperflow; workflow; facilities; records retention; court reporting; court interpreting; issues surrounding pro se litigants; law libraries; remote access to
information;
jury management; courtroom
information / evidence presentations; collections /
managing collection fines / fees / restitution; administrative functions; and scanning the «environment» for things like compliance with technology related «regulations, standards and guidelines» (e.g., GJXDM).