Based loosely on a true story that was prominently featured in the PBS series «Frontline», Dwayne Johnson (Fast Five, Get Smart) stars as John Matthews, a construction business - owning father who desperately is trying to save his 18 - year - old son, Jason (Gavron, Breaking and Entering), from going to prison for a huge chunk of his life due to the rigidity of the Federal
mandatory sentence drug charges in place.
It is part an indictment of the ludicrous
mandatory sentence drug laws, and part dramatic thriller, while only delivering on one big action scene late in the film involving Matthews trying to drive a semi containing a shipment of cash through the border to Mexico, while trying to avoid men with machine guns driving cars trying to take him down.
Not exact matches
During the war on
drugs, lengthy
mandatory minimum
sentences became standard for
drug offenders.
While his Democratic predecessor Eric Holder told federal prosecutors to avoid seeking long
mandatory minimum
sentences when charging some lower - level
drug offenders, for example, Sessions issued an order demanding the opposite, telling them to pursue the most serious charges possible against most suspects.
WASHINGTON The White House on Tuesday urged U.S. lawmakers to move ahead with legislation to help prisoners prepare for life after release, but stopped short of calling for broader reforms such as changing
mandatory minimum
sentences for
drug crimes.
So prison populations soared, and
mandatory sentences forced often reluctant judges to imprison first - time offenders, many of them lower - level «mules» who were merely carrying the
drugs for the dealers, who were seldom touched.
naive First Lady Reagan and her solution of «Just say no,» to an equally well - meaning but equally naive Governor Nelson Rockefeller and his
mandatory maximum
sentences, we have been defeated in our War on
Drugs.
In the op - ed for USA Today, Moore pushed for fixing
mandatory minimum
sentences, focusing on treatment instead of incarceration for
drug offenders and those suffering from mental illnesses, and better awareness of why people are jailed.
Victim of the
Drug War's harsh
mandatory sentencing, as well as possible racial bias and entrapment, the onetime Rams star is 20 years into a 41 - year jail term.
Skelos begs for sympathy because he had the mumps as a kid — but he held out longer than anyone on the
mandatory sentencing provisions under the Rockefeller
drug laws.
He intends to tailor his message more explicitly to minority voters, drawing more attention to his overhaul of the Rockefeller
mandatory -
drug -
sentencing laws.
In the fast - paced action thriller, Dwayne Johnson stars as a father whose teenage son is wrongly accused of a
drug distribution crime and is looking at a
mandatory minimum prison
sentence of 10 years.
He refuses to concoct evidence against someone else for a reduced
sentence — that how the
mandatory - minimum
drug laws work.
In the action thriller SNITCH, Dwayne Johnson stars as a father whose teenage son is wrongly accused of a
drug distribution crime and is looking at a
mandatory minimum prison
sentence of 10 years.
Rudy Valdez's «The
Sentence» is a heartbreaking film about a Latina mother who is
sentenced to a
mandatory 15 years in prison because she lived with a man who trafficked in
drugs and guns.
Mandatory minimum
sentencing provisions for certain
drug offences look especially ripe for a constitutional challenge, particularly when they are applied to the mentally ill, those with
drug addictions, or aboriginal offenders.
«Softer»
drugs like marijuana are allowed for medicinal use, and possession for non-licensed individuals may result in a misdemeanor rather than a felony, but even for marijuana there's a
mandatory minimum
sentencing guideline.
Today, many Minnesota
drug convictions come with
mandatory sentences making it even more important to hire an experienced attorney to defend you.
Mandatory minimum
sentences for non-violent
drug offenders were enacted in 2012, part of changes to the criminal law made by the Conservatives.
It might behoove the Minister to recall that, under his watch,
mandatory minimum
sentences are already being imposed for «illegal
drugs and guns» along with new
sentencing provisions for involvement in criminal organizations.
As a coalition of interveners in the Supreme Court of Canada case, R. v. Lloyd, we applaud the Court for recognizing that a
mandatory minimum
sentence (MMS) for certain
drug offences is not only harsh and damaging, but also unconstitutional.
May 2, 2017 in
Drug Offense
Sentencing, Mandatory minimum sentencing statutes, State Sentencing Guidelines, Who
Sentencing,
Mandatory minimum
sentencing statutes, State Sentencing Guidelines, Who
sentencing statutes, State
Sentencing Guidelines, Who
Sentencing Guidelines, Who
Sentences?
Fast forward a quarter - century and this news about a new Canadian court ruling shows our neighbor jurists to the north have a much different conception of what kind of
mandatory drug sentence violates a constitutional provision precluding cruel and unusual punishments.
Conviction for some federal
drug offenses can result in
mandatory prison
sentences of 5, 10 and 20 years.
«At the same time, there is a growing body of evidence that
mandatory minimum
sentences wreak terrible damage on individuals (particularly those who are dependent on
drugs), families and communities, -LSB-...]
«
Mandatory sentencing makes sense for crimes like murder and rapes, but some of the drug charges where it is mandatory is frustrating,»
Mandatory sentencing makes sense for crimes like murder and rapes, but some of the
drug charges where it is
mandatory is frustrating,»
mandatory is frustrating,» he said.
The article is headlined «Rulings from Canada's top court strike down
mandatory minimum
sentences for
drugs and bail conditions,» and here are the basics:
Drug cases in particular need to be examined from every angle, in many cases are subject to
mandatory minimum
sentences, and aggressive representation can protect your future.
If you are arrested and have a prior
drug conviction, you potentially face a
mandatory prison
sentence in both State and Federal Court.
March 18, 2010 in
Drug Offense
Sentencing, Mandatory minimum sentencing statutes, Weblogs, Who
Sentencing,
Mandatory minimum
sentencing statutes, Weblogs, Who
sentencing statutes, Weblogs, Who
Sentences?
Drug trafficking and Marijuana grow operations may attract
mandatory sentences.
Under federal law, people convicted of
drug offenses are subject to strict
mandatory minimum
sentences based largely on the quantity of
drugs possessed by the defendant.
The article begins with a history of federal
sentencing, then focuses on problems related to
mandatory minimum
sentencing and application of 21 U.S.C. § 851 prior conviction enhancements in federal
drug cases.
«At one end of the range of conduct caught by the
mandatory minimum
sentence provision stands a professional
drug dealer who engages in the business of dangerous
drugs for profit, who is in possession of a large amount of Schedule I substances, and who has been convicted many times for similar offences.
The case challenged the constitutionality of section 5 (3)(a)(i)(D) of the Controlled
Drugs and Substances Act, which created a
mandatory minimum jail
sentence of one year for
drug trafficking in certain situations.
In August 2013, US Attorney General Eric Holder admitted that
mandatory minimum
sentences for
drug offences were «draconian» and that too many Americans had been imprisoned for too long for no good law enforcement justification.
In early 2016 the congressional task force created to examine overcrowding in the federal prison system, recommended the repeal of federal
mandatory minimum
sentences for
drug offences.
Different legislative initiatives have been tabled, including the Smarter
Sentencing Act, which would cut many
mandatory minimums for
drug offences in half.
Drug charges, including methamphetamine, marijuana, cocaine, heroin, or prescription
drugs, need to be examined from every angle, and in many cases are subject to
mandatory minimum
sentences.
The imposition of the
mandatory minimum
sentence at issue in this case would have disproportionately negative consequences for women because of the nature of their involvement with the
drug trade, this impact of incarceration on child custody and motherhood, and the likelihood that BC women will be jailed far from their home communities.
Congress passes very stiff
sentencing laws with
mandatory minimums and such, particularly
drug cases now also child porn cases.
For immediate release — April 15, 2016 VANCOUVER — In a ground - breaking judgment, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled today that
mandatory minimum
sentencing for certain
drug offences violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
And, according to Judge Barron, ultimately judges «have no choice but to approve
mandatory «forever»
sentences under § 924 (c) so long as they can hypothesize a rational reason for the legislature to have thought that the underlying criminal conduct was as serious as the large quantity
drug possession at issue in Harmelin.»
If you have been charged with a
drug crime in Illinois, you could be facing serious penalties, including a
mandatory prison
sentence and substantial fines.
If you are convicted of
drug possession for sale, manufacture, or transport, and if the amount of the
drug involved is above the statutory threshold amount, a
mandatory prison
sentence will be imposed.
First, West Coast LEAF will be intervening at the Supreme Court of Canada in a case challenging the constitutionality of a section of the Controlled
Drugs and Substances Act that creates a
mandatory minimum jail
sentence of one year for
drug trafficking in certain situations.
These include expanded «safety valves» for non-violent offenders; a reduction in
mandatory minimums for some
drug crimes; and a reduction in
sentences for offenders who complete programs designed to reduce recidivation.
December 18, 2017 in
Drug Offense
Sentencing, Mandatory minimum sentencing statutes, Procedure and Proof at Sentencing, Who
Sentencing,
Mandatory minimum
sentencing statutes, Procedure and Proof at Sentencing, Who
sentencing statutes, Procedure and Proof at
Sentencing, Who
Sentencing, Who
Sentences?
A bipartisan consensus in Congress passed the Fair
Sentencing Act in 2010, reducing disparities between
mandatory minimum
sentences for different
drugs, in part «because the public had come to understand
sentences embodying the 100 - to - 1 ratio as reflecting unjustified race - based differences.»
November 26, 2017 in
Drug Offense
Sentencing, Mandatory minimum sentencing statutes, Procedure and Proof at Sentencing, Sentences Reconsidered Permalink Co
Sentencing,
Mandatory minimum
sentencing statutes, Procedure and Proof at Sentencing, Sentences Reconsidered Permalink Co
sentencing statutes, Procedure and Proof at
Sentencing, Sentences Reconsidered Permalink Co
Sentencing,
Sentences Reconsidered Permalink Comments (2)