Personally i think here is a man who does not understand his limitations or that of
mankind as a species.
Because all religions come from the culture and people who create them and speak to the basic fears and desires of
mankind as a species.
... if medical science is geography, then
mankind as a species has a map with three towns marked on it and a lot of blank space with drawings of sea serpents.
Not exact matches
We should be happy about how far we have come
as a
species via the hard work and dedication of man kind... we should be stopping and looking at the big picture and think about how far we have come in 2000 years... we have made tremendous progress in so many ways and it is really sad that instead of doing the right thing and giving
mankind credit where credit is due, you fall back on 2000 year old beliefs and you thank a god who has never been proven to exist.
In this sense it is evident that
Mankind of its nature behaves like a
species, and is therefore subject
as a whole,
as in the case of the individual, to a definite cycle of development.
The primordial life had the potentiality of evolving
mankind,
as well
as every one of the several million existing and extinct
species.
As he observed: «We now stand at a turning - point in the history of the biosphere and in the shorter history of one of its products,
mankind... Man is the first
species of living being in our biosphere that has acquired the power to wreck the biosphere and, in wrecking it, to liquidate himself.»
Given Noah was the favored
species as with the animals on the boat at best you naturalists would applaud the advancement of
mankind not attributing anthropomorphic nonsense
as you accuse believers of doing.
Some, such
as the sceptics S. Fred Singer and Dennis Avery, see no danger at all, maintaining that a warmer planet will be beneficial for
mankind and other
species on the planet and that «corals, trees, birds, mammals, and butterflies are adapting well to the routine reality of changing climate».
Though he considers himself a «fierce property - rights advocate,» Crary sees «wilderness values»
as key to preserving spectacular landscapes and unique ecosystems for
mankind's (and other
species») future.
With an opening that has Herzog immodestly laying out his mission statement
as wishing to discover, in a roundabout way, why it is that men are obsessed with riding their metaphorical steeds into the wild unknowns, he illustrates the conundrum with a sideswipe at
mankind, equating us with ants that hold other insect
species as «slaves» and wondering why chimps, despite their intellectual sophistication, decline to domesticate goats to ride them on their own existential pursuits.
And while the Avengers might have been fractured by the events of Civil War, it's once again their duty and task to stand for all of
mankind and every other
species,
as the only beings capable of solving a problem like Thanos.
«It must, indeed, be confessed, that nature is so liberal to
mankind, that, were all her presents equally divided among the
species, and improved by art and industry, every individual would enjoy all the necessaries, and even most of the comforts of life; nor would ever be liable to any ills, but such
as might accidentally arise from the sickly frame and constitution of the body.»
Since the climate is the average of local weather, and weather is the sum of behavior of the surging gases around us, and
mankind moves through and modifies these gases,
as does every other animal and plant
species, it is certain humanity influences the weather, hence climate.
Even the smoky cowpat fire of the poorest on earth, possibly the lowest form of energy that
mankind uses defines
mankind as a distinct and separate
species that is above all other
species due to his use and control of energy.
Mankind needs four things to survive both individually and
as a
species.