michael
mann said...» I think we have to stop considering «Climate Research» as a legitimate peer - reviewed journal.
Not exact matches
Say, whatever happened to the former terminology, «
mann - made global warming?»
[reposted on behalf of john
mann] Re: «At May 22, 2006 10:42 PM, Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod (tm)
said...... alteration in coastline of the Mediterranean (where consistent human settlement has established such records) shows that the situation you present NEVER existed» I think you're implying that sea levels have continued to rise in the mediterranean.
Steve, not trying to nitpick but although it is somewhat true what you
said that
mann is one of the few who provide adequate data and codes and such, I think that it really depends on the type of paleoclimatologists.
you can always try
manns tactic and attack the messenger you can
say it does nt matter.
MICHAEL
MANN: One of the things that Lamar Smith has
said publicly, the chair of the House Science Committee we were talking about, is he would like to get rid of peer review at the National Science Foundation and replace that with congressional oversight.
I would venture to
say that a similar list of questions have been compiled for
mann to answer.
Mann: its all in the SI Amac: hey
mann website now
says 2 +2 = 4 Gavin: The exact value of 2 +2 is uninteresting.
I do have some sympathies for a position that
says dr
mann should not be «convicted» based on evidence that was illegally obtained.
«MICHAEL
MANN COMMITTED FRAUD I'm not sure there's any argument to
say Michael
Mann's work isn't fraudulent.
Listen to the youtube video of my presentation, i do not trash
mann in any way in the words that I
said associated with this cartoon.