Sentences with phrase «manner as a court»

(3) Without prejudice to any other power to deal with an act of contempt under paragraph (a) of subsection (1), the court may order the instrument, or any recording made with it, or both, to be forfeited; and any object so forfeited shall (unless the court otherwise determines on application by a person appearing to be the owner) be sold or otherwise disposed of in such manner as the court may direct.

An arbitration proceeding does not have to be conducted in the same manner as a court proceeding.

(b) receive further evidence by affidavit, transcript of oral examination, oral examination before the court or in such other manner as the court directs; and

the determinations of tribunals could be recommendatory or binding, and in the case of the latter could have the effect of a court order or be enforceable in the same manner as a court order; and,

(c) order that payment of any sum ordered to be paid be wholly or partly secured in such manner as the court directs;

Not exact matches

But he also acted in a manner consistent with the rule of law as it has been clearly interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Who cares if you don't want to deal with it, our courts however view LGBT civil rights in the SAME EXACT manner as civil rights based on skin color.

Amar's thesis, in a nutshell, is this: 1) The Bill of Rights was not conceived by the framers as a charter of individual liberties in the manner now routinely employed by the Court.

If through my inexperience I have either not given the proper titles to some, or have offended in some manner against customs and court etiquette, I ask you kindly to pardon me, as a man accustomed not to courts but to the cells of monks.

Now, did God establish the 10 commandments in court houses in the same manner, the removal of which would and should then be accepted as the will of God?

Mr. Kevor is asking the Supreme court to rule that the A-G who is the principal legal representative of the Government of Ghana can not in the same manner act as the private legal representative for Mr. Ken Ofori Attah, cousin of the President and also minister of Finance based on articles 88 (5), 218 (a) and (e), 284 and 287.

My interest in this whole issue comes from the fact that if our law courts especially the highest court in Ghana, Supreme Court that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a coucourt in Ghana, Supreme Court that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a couCourt that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a country?

This manner of proceeding resembles US - style «court packing»; only worse, as nothing prevents the House being packed with campaign finance bundlers and other partisan hacks of the kind who in the past had been «gruntled» with minor ambassadorial posts.

As a citizen of Ghana, I felt scandalized as why why our learned CJ would treat members of Parliament in open court in such undignified manner especially when Members of Parliament are direct representatives of the peoplAs a citizen of Ghana, I felt scandalized as why why our learned CJ would treat members of Parliament in open court in such undignified manner especially when Members of Parliament are direct representatives of the peoplas why why our learned CJ would treat members of Parliament in open court in such undignified manner especially when Members of Parliament are direct representatives of the people.

As an astute lawyer of your calibre and with your long association with the British legal system, I am very sure you know of the latter enactment, by declaring the court of High Commission, which James 11, had endeavoured to reestablish under the name of the commissioners for Ecclesiastical Caucus, to be illegal, put an end for ever to the attempts of the crown to set up courts where men might be tried in an uncertain and arbitrary manner, and which had proved such a fertile source of tyranny in the case of the then star chamber.

This is because the Court in Miller was not claiming that a well regulated militia is required for gun ownership, but rather that it can be used as a guide as to the appropriate manner and intent of individual gun ownership.

As for regulating the «manner» of elections, the Supreme Court has interpreted this to mean «matters like notices, registration, supervision of voting, protection of voters, prevention of fraud and corrupt practices, counting of votes, duties of inspectors and canvassers, and making and publication of election returns.»

«We strongly belief that President Buhari, must be seen to be acting contrary to court decisions on the use of Military during elections as clearly stated in the rulings of Justice Aikawa of the Federal High Court, who in his judgment, restrained the President and Commander - in - Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and INEC from engaging the service of the Nigerian armed forces in the security supervision of elections in any manner whatsoever in any part of Nigeria, without the Act of the National Assecourt decisions on the use of Military during elections as clearly stated in the rulings of Justice Aikawa of the Federal High Court, who in his judgment, restrained the President and Commander - in - Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and INEC from engaging the service of the Nigerian armed forces in the security supervision of elections in any manner whatsoever in any part of Nigeria, without the Act of the National AsseCourt, who in his judgment, restrained the President and Commander - in - Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and INEC from engaging the service of the Nigerian armed forces in the security supervision of elections in any manner whatsoever in any part of Nigeria, without the Act of the National Assembly.

He frowned that in spite of sabotage, Justice Abdu - Kafarati of the Federal High Court in Abuja had granted Ubah's application for fundamental human rights «in such a manner as to prevent or frustrate investigations into the scam.»

The trial - within - trial which commenced at the last sitting, October 6, saw the principal witness, Sini Omar, denying taking the statements of the accused persons under duress as he told the court that, all the statements were given voluntarily and conducted in a professional manner.

In the same manner, the National Assembly whose law can be struck down by the court on the basis that it is unconstitutional can also amend a law later to override the decision of the Supreme Court as they did in the onshore / offshore oil court on the basis that it is unconstitutional can also amend a law later to override the decision of the Supreme Court as they did in the onshore / offshore oil Court as they did in the onshore / offshore oil case.

The Founding Fathers only said in the U.S. Constitution about presidential elections (only after debating among 30 ballots for choosing a method): «Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors...» The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly characterized the authority of the state legislatures over the manner of awarding their electoral votes as «plenary» and «exclusive.&Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors...» The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly characterized the authority of the state legislatures over the manner of awarding their electoral votes as «plenary» and «exclusive.&manner of awarding their electoral votes as «plenary» and «exclusive.»

In July, as part of a pretrial filing in the Silver case, Bharara submitted a letter to Silver's defense attorneys (who submitted it to the court in early September) asserting that Rice and another Moreland co-chair, Milton Williams Jr., as well as Perry, had told prosecutors «they believed the governor and his staff were intervening in the activities of the Moreland Commission in a manner that, at times, led them to question the independence of the Moreland Commission.»

«As if the palpable odium of intiating a vacuous criminal charge against a whistle - blower, no less a person than a distinguished senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria was not bad enough, the prosecuting authority, obviously urged on by the Inspector General of Police, threw pretension to adherence to democratic tenets of the rule of law when it sought from the court, albeit most illegally, to obtain summons against Senator Misau, while deliberately witholding service of the copy of the charge on the Senator, an obvious stratagem conceived to frame up all manner of false allegations tailored to suit the obvious purpose of yet another gestapo strategy to use state powers to swoop on the Distinguished Senator and keep him out of circulation»

Thus, there is a risk that children that behave in a neutral manner may be perceived as less credible in court.

These are the items that are going to define your look as one that is either sporty (via Puma high tops) or country chic (with a wide brimmed hat, strappy tan wedges and an oversized canvas tote) or perhaps of a more business manner (sleek court shoes, black rimmed glasses and a structured box like bag delicately hung of your watch wearing wrist).

The Court of Appeal, however, said that the regulations were properly read as requiring the school district to provide its facilities to charter schools in a manner that will promote Proposition 39's intent of public school facilities being shared fairly among all pupils, including those in charter schools.

If a court of competent jurisdiction determines that any term or provision of these Terms and Conditions is invalid, illegal, or incapable of being enforced, all other terms and provisions of these Terms and Conditions shall remain in full force and effect so long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated herein is not affected in a manner that is materially adverse to either party to the Terms and Conditions.

The first one, practiced by Li Sixun, the court painter, and his son Li Zhaodao, employed the meticulous and decorative manner of painting using precise line technique, inspired by the earlier artists such as Zhan Ziqian and Gu Kaizhi.

«It is our hope that the court will deny the petition so that this public access issue can be resolved in as timely a manner as possible, to allow the public to return to recreating at and enjoying these public trust resources.»

About the lawsuit stopping the floodgate project, the court said that its opinion and order should «in no way be construed as precluding the Lake Pontchartrain project as proposed or reflecting on its advisability in any manner,» and it stressed that «upon proper compliance with the law with regard to the impact statement, this injunction will be dissolved and any hurricane plan thus properly presented will be allowed to proceed.»

However, evolving technology in several courts and technology is a formidable task, as it requires the simultaneous consideration of many facets: legacy systems and technology, migration challenges, legislative and regulatory barriers, government procurement rules, technology obsolescence cycle... Not to mention, understanding fundamental technology trends, their manifestations and how to exploit them in a sustainable manner in a court context.

regard criminal offences such as those referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 83 (1) TFEU as constituting a particularly serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society, which might pose a direct threat to the calm and physical security of the population and thus be covered by the concept of «imperative grounds of public security» -LSB-...], as long as the manner in which such offences were committed discloses particularly serious characteristics, which is a matter for the referring court to determine -LSB-...].

[a] tax measure such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which is, according to the referring court's description of its history and purpose, intended to prevent excessive capital flow towards the Netherlands Antilles and to counter the appeal of that OCT as a tax haven, comes under the tax carve - out clause cited above and remains, consequently, outside the scope of application of Article 47 (1) of the [Seventh] OCT Decision, provided it pursues that objective in an effective and proportionate manner, which is a matter for the referring court to assess.

The Court then went on to say that «the disclosure of such legal advice, which was preparatory and internal and drawn up for the purpose of political dialogue between the institution and representatives of a Member State and a third state would have actually undermined, in a foreseeable manner, the Commission's interest in seeking and receiving frank, objective and comprehensive advice from its various department in order to prepare its final position as an institution, in an area of certain high political sensitivity, and in a context of urgency in order to address a delicate migration situation» (para 93).

Jason Pettus is a civil litigation defense attorney with a strong litigation background through the representation of general contractors, subcontractors, owners, and design professionals in the resolution of all manner of construction issues, including construction / design defect claims, environmental claims and contractual disputes, catastrophic injury, premises liability, and motor vehicle accidents in both state and federal courts, as well as insurance coverage analysis, advisement of clients, and coverage litigation.

Finally, as the Court is not actually interpreting terms in a different manner for Member States, than it is doing for the internal EU legal order, but rather (dis) applying them due to the nature of the EU, I do not see how the «inequal treatment» plays into it.

These agreements are foundational to any production, as without them, courts throughout the world have recognized, and alike failed to recognize, various copyrights in all manner of contribution.

Courts have rejected challenges under article V (1)(d) where the parties choose institutional rules to govern their procedure that provide for flexibility concerning the manner in which the tribunal is to be composed.881 On the other hand, a German court refused recognition and enforcement where an award was rendered by two, instead of three arbitrators, as expressly required by the rules of the International Arbitration Court of the Belarusian Chamber of Commerce that the parties had agreed would govern their arbitratiocourt refused recognition and enforcement where an award was rendered by two, instead of three arbitrators, as expressly required by the rules of the International Arbitration Court of the Belarusian Chamber of Commerce that the parties had agreed would govern their arbitratioCourt of the Belarusian Chamber of Commerce that the parties had agreed would govern their arbitration.882

Although Collaborative Practice is a legal process, in the Collaborative Divorce process, the couple and a team of specially trained Collaborative Professionals, including neutral Mental Health and Financial Professionals, as needed, enter into a contract called a tyticipation Agreement wherein they agree to work together to achieve a satisfactory settlement in a cooperative manner without court intervention.

An arbitral award was rendered in India against a United States corporation, which argued before the Court that it should not be enforced in the United States on grounds that India would not have enforced the award had it been rendered in the United States in its favour, and that therefore, «the reciprocity between India and the United States as required by the Convention [article XIV] was absent».1394 The contesting party further argued that article XIV requires courts to determine the extent to which India applies the Convention and whether India treats awards rendered in India in favour of Indian parties in a similar manner.

As a result, Rose says, for now, it is safe to say that we know the courts will heavily scrutinize termination clauses in a manner that favours employees, and that if a termination clause has the potential to violate the ESA, then it is unenforceable.

Courts are usually not formalistic in their approach to article V (1)(d) and as a result have applied it in a restrictive manner.857 This is consistent with the general discretion of courts to refuse challenges under article V (1) of the Convention, which provides that a court «may» refuse recognition and enforcemeCourts are usually not formalistic in their approach to article V (1)(d) and as a result have applied it in a restrictive manner.857 This is consistent with the general discretion of courts to refuse challenges under article V (1) of the Convention, which provides that a court «may» refuse recognition and enforcemecourts to refuse challenges under article V (1) of the Convention, which provides that a court «may» refuse recognition and enforcement.858

A person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if the person in any manner and for any purpose uses or operates a device to capture, record, transmit or broadcast a photograph, video, motion picture or audio of a proceeding or person within a hearing room, courtroom or the environs of a hearing room or courtroom without the approval of the court or presiding judicial officer or except as provided by rules of court...» environs» means the area immediately surrounding any entrance or exit.

In any event, however, to most effectively avoid finding themselves in the same position as the employer in Strudwick, employers should take care to abide by their human rights obligations and to avoid acting in a manner that may be negatively construed by the courts when carrying out any employment - related matter.

Courts have explained that a deadly weapon should be defined to include «any object, instrument, or weapon which is used in such a manner as to be capable of producing and likely to produce, death or great bodily injury.»

If the registered proprietor refuses to do what is right, the Court has full power direct the register to be rectified in such manner as it thinks just... I can not doubt that the sections above referred to suffice to enable the court, in all cases for which no express provision is made... to cause the register of proprietors be rectified, so as to confer the statutory benefits of registration upon any person who, in the opinion of the Court, is entitled to claim those beneCourt has full power direct the register to be rectified in such manner as it thinks just... I can not doubt that the sections above referred to suffice to enable the court, in all cases for which no express provision is made... to cause the register of proprietors be rectified, so as to confer the statutory benefits of registration upon any person who, in the opinion of the Court, is entitled to claim those benecourt, in all cases for which no express provision is made... to cause the register of proprietors be rectified, so as to confer the statutory benefits of registration upon any person who, in the opinion of the Court, is entitled to claim those beneCourt, is entitled to claim those benefits.

Although New Jersey no longer requires lawyers to have a fixed «bona fide» physical office, a lawyer must structure his or her practice in such a manner as to ensure «accessibility» and «prompt and reliable communication» with clients, other lawyers, and courts.

As the Court of Appeal saw it, the critical features of s 1 are that the defendant must have acted in an anti-social manner in the past and that an order must be necessary to protect the public from further and future anti-social acts.

In PAP and non-PAP cases: notice of the existence of a funding arrangement should be communicated to all other parties as soon as possible; if proceedings are started for limitation reasons with bad pre-action manners, the parties should seek to agree to apply to the court for a stay while they take steps to comply; and where proceedings are started, the claimant should state in the claim form or particulars of claim whether they have complied with the PD and any relevant PAP.