In
the manner of the realists, the competence of reason to understand the intelligible structures of the world both as fact and as value is affirmed.
Not exact matches
As the romantic and the
realist set off across the wilderness in search
of their respective rewards, writer / director Maclean ensures that they run into all
manner of characters, hailing from all
manner of lands, ranging from a fur coat - clad Payne (Mendelsohn) to a trio
of Congolese immigrants to a German anthropologist who wryly observes that «in a short time, this will be a long time ago.»
In a lively and engaging narrative, Ellis recounts the sometimes collaborative, sometimes archly antagonistic interactions between these men, and shows us the private characters behind the public personas: Adams, the ever - combative iconoclast, whose closest political collaborator was his wife, Abigail; Burr, crafty, smooth, and one
of the most despised public figures
of his time; Hamilton, whose audacious
manner and deep economic savvy masked his humble origins; Jefferson, renowned for his eloquence, but so reclusive and taciturn that he rarely spoke more than a few sentences in public; Madison, small, sickly, and paralyzingly shy, yet one
of the most effective debaters
of his generation; and the stiffly formal Washington, the ultimate
realist, larger - than - life, and America's only truly indispensable figure.
But not in the
manner of a modern
realist.
Richard Schmid is an American contemporary artist, who is considered as one
of the greatest living
realist painters, creating in a grand
manner.
Bradley, however, will also debut new paintings from a series
of works that represent, in a nearly photo -
realist manner, the entire catalogue
of Joy Division bootlegs.
An American painting movement which depicted urban / industrial landscapes often in a Cubist / Futurist
manner, its members were known by a variety
of labels such as «Cubist -
Realists», «Immaculates», «Sterilists» or «modern classicists».
And I would offer a similar criticism
of that as well, as IMO, you neither ground that form
of analogizing in a scientific
manner; as I have told you, I think that your inclusion and exclusion criteria selection process is quite arbitrary, and I don't think that it is coincidence that it confirms your distinction
of a group you belong to («skeptics») from a group you criticize («
realists») in ways that (1) reaffirm a superiority in the group you belong to and, (2) I consider to be superficial and not meaningful as compared to the vastly more important underlying similarities (e.g., the tendency toward identity protective behavior, motivated reasoning, cultural cognition, confirmation bias, emotively - influenced reasoning, etc.)...
As far as I am familiar with Lewandowsky's work, which isn't very far, it seems to me that it shows that there is some association
of conspiratorial ideation and climate «skepticism,» but fails to address in a scientific
manner the question
of whether it predominates, relatively in «skeptics» as compared to «
realists.»