Sentences with phrase «manufacture dangerous products»

A company that sold or manufactured a dangerous product, or supplied a dangerous product with insufficient warnings.

Not exact matches

The latter legal doctrine covers claims against companies who manufacture and sell a defective or dangerous product.
KID's goal is to create a secure environment for children by ensuring that safer products are manufactured, improving recall effectiveness, and encouraging parents and caregivers to remove dangerous or recalled products from homes and childcare facilities.
A manufacturer can be found strictly liable for dangerous manufacturing defects, even if it has exercised «all possible care» in preparing the product.33
(Unrated) Eco-expose» about many dangerous chemicals politicians knowingly allow avaricious corporations to manufacture and disseminate in consumer products.
The benefit for the groomer is in knowing they are using effective products manufactured without dangerous chemicals.
Note: Always use worming products that are manufactured specifically for dogs, some, such as equine worming tablets can be extremely dangerous for our canine companions.
There is no doubt that the rising upswing in consumer awareness about pet obesity and the resulting health complications, driven by both the veterinary industry and the pet product manufacturing and retailing industry, will continue to drive home the message that pet parents need to be vigilant in their attempts to get this pesky — and dangerous — weight problem under control.
Products may be dangerous because of design defects, manufacturing defects, incomplete or incorrect instructions, failure to provide danger warnings, or failure to honor warranties.
This means a product can still be considered dangerous even if there wasn't a design defect and it was still manufactured according to proper industry standards.
Possible legal theories that can be argued in a products liability case include negligence (lack of reasonable care in the manufacture or sale of the product or in warning about the product), breach of warranty (failure to fulfill the terms of a promise regarding the product's performance), misrepresentation (giving consumers a false sense of security about a product's safety), and strict liability (under which the product's defect, although not the fault of the defendant, rendered the product unreasonably dangerous and the defendant is therefore responsible).
The laws have changed from caveat emptor («let the buyer beware») to Strict Liability for manufacturing defects that make a product unreasonably dangerous.
For example, suppose that the product has two kinds of defectively manufactured components manufactured by companies with two different home states in the U.S. (e.g. an electronic device charging bay and a battery) that are assembled by the customer after they are delivered independently, which, when acting together, cause the assembled product to be dangerous and cause injury even though the design itself is not defective.
Many kinds of products can prove dangerous if designed or manufactured poorly.
The product is manufactured correctly, but because of the way it was conceived it is unreasonably dangerous to a user or consumer when used for its intended purpose.
First, a product can be unreasonably dangerous because of a manufacturing defect.
Manufacturing Defects — A manufacturing defect is one that occurs during the process of making the product and results in the product deviating from the way it was designed in a way that's dangerous to users or consumers.
To recover compensation, the plaintiff must show that the product was designed or manufactured in an unreasonably dangerous manner or that the defendant failed to include appropriate warnings and instructions with the product.
Even when a vehicle or vehicle component has been designed and manufactured in strict compliance with current industry standards and applicable regulations, the vehicle may still be found defective in a personal - injury or wrongful - death products - liability action if it is determined to contain a defect in its design, manufacture, or warnings that renders it unreasonably dangerous for consumers» use.
Even though these products may have been properly manufactured, they have been discovered as dangerous, which can pose significant harm to the car's passengers.
After the boy's death, the plaintiffs filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the manufacturer, alleging that the doorbell cover was a dangerous product that failed to work as intended and that it was negligently manufactured and marketed by the defendant.
-- Consumers in Arizona are protected against dangerous and defective products by state and federal laws, but manufacturing and design defects contribute to numerous injuries each year.
A product can become dangerous in several ways: through design defect, manufacturing defect or mislabeling or false advertising by the product marketer.
We have handled a wide variety of product - related litigation, ranging from involving allegations that companies manufactured dangerous drugs and or defective products.
Claims for defective manufacture: these types of claims arise when a product has been defectively manufactured and that defect makes the product dangerous
Claims for defective design: these claims may occur when a product has been defectively designed, meaning that it is inherently dangerous, even though it was correctly manufactured
Lawsuits for allegedly dangerous products typically either claim negligence in design or strict liability in manufacturing, according to FindLaw.
In other words, a product that has been properly manufactured and designed may still be inherently dangerous, even when used as intended, making such warnings and instructions crucial to their reasonably safe use.
Our legal professionals are committed to delivering highly responsive legal representation to clients facing individual claims and class action lawsuits involving allegations that companies manufactured dangerous drugs and or defective products.
At Moffitt & Phillips, PLLC, we represent people who have been injured or killed by defective products or unsafe products that have design defects (intended design is unreasonably dangerous), manufacturing defects (product does not conform to the designer's or manufacturer's specifications), or marketing defects (improper or misleading labels, insufficient instructions, or failure to warn about a product's hidden dangers.)
Whether this means a person getting behind the wheel while drunk, a business owner failing to adequately clean up a dangerous spill in a public area, or a company manufacturing poorly designed, dangerous consumer products, a victim of negligence may be entitled to recover financial compensation for his or her damages.
Although wrongful death cases can arise under numerous circumstances, they typically involve deaths caused by car or truck accidents; the manufacture of a defective or dangerous product; the construction of an unsound structure or building; or failing to properly diagnose or treat a serious medical condition.
In addition, [defendant] asserts there is no separate «failure to test claim» apart from the duty to design and manufacture a product that is not defective and unreasonably dangerous.
Plas - Tex and Tanshaw are said to support the conclusion that a manufacturer has a recognized duty of care to those in its supply chain not to manufacture and provide a product that has become dangerous as a result of negligence.
Design defects: This type of case involves a product that was manufactured as intended but the design concept was unreasonably dangerous.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z