A company that sold or
manufactured a dangerous product, or supplied a dangerous product with insufficient warnings.
Not exact matches
The latter legal doctrine covers claims against companies who
manufacture and sell a defective or
dangerous product.
KID's goal is to create a secure environment for children by ensuring that safer
products are
manufactured, improving recall effectiveness, and encouraging parents and caregivers to remove
dangerous or recalled
products from homes and childcare facilities.
A manufacturer can be found strictly liable for
dangerous manufacturing defects, even if it has exercised «all possible care» in preparing the
product.33
(Unrated) Eco-expose» about many
dangerous chemicals politicians knowingly allow avaricious corporations to
manufacture and disseminate in consumer
products.
The benefit for the groomer is in knowing they are using effective
products manufactured without
dangerous chemicals.
Note: Always use worming
products that are
manufactured specifically for dogs, some, such as equine worming tablets can be extremely
dangerous for our canine companions.
There is no doubt that the rising upswing in consumer awareness about pet obesity and the resulting health complications, driven by both the veterinary industry and the pet
product manufacturing and retailing industry, will continue to drive home the message that pet parents need to be vigilant in their attempts to get this pesky — and
dangerous — weight problem under control.
Products may be
dangerous because of design defects,
manufacturing defects, incomplete or incorrect instructions, failure to provide danger warnings, or failure to honor warranties.
This means a
product can still be considered
dangerous even if there wasn't a design defect and it was still
manufactured according to proper industry standards.
Possible legal theories that can be argued in a
products liability case include negligence (lack of reasonable care in the
manufacture or sale of the
product or in warning about the
product), breach of warranty (failure to fulfill the terms of a promise regarding the
product's performance), misrepresentation (giving consumers a false sense of security about a
product's safety), and strict liability (under which the
product's defect, although not the fault of the defendant, rendered the
product unreasonably
dangerous and the defendant is therefore responsible).
The laws have changed from caveat emptor («let the buyer beware») to Strict Liability for
manufacturing defects that make a
product unreasonably
dangerous.
For example, suppose that the
product has two kinds of defectively
manufactured components
manufactured by companies with two different home states in the U.S. (e.g. an electronic device charging bay and a battery) that are assembled by the customer after they are delivered independently, which, when acting together, cause the assembled
product to be
dangerous and cause injury even though the design itself is not defective.
Many kinds of
products can prove
dangerous if designed or
manufactured poorly.
The
product is
manufactured correctly, but because of the way it was conceived it is unreasonably
dangerous to a user or consumer when used for its intended purpose.
First, a
product can be unreasonably
dangerous because of a
manufacturing defect.
Manufacturing Defects — A
manufacturing defect is one that occurs during the process of making the
product and results in the
product deviating from the way it was designed in a way that's
dangerous to users or consumers.
To recover compensation, the plaintiff must show that the
product was designed or
manufactured in an unreasonably
dangerous manner or that the defendant failed to include appropriate warnings and instructions with the
product.
Even when a vehicle or vehicle component has been designed and
manufactured in strict compliance with current industry standards and applicable regulations, the vehicle may still be found defective in a personal - injury or wrongful - death
products - liability action if it is determined to contain a defect in its design,
manufacture, or warnings that renders it unreasonably
dangerous for consumers» use.
Even though these
products may have been properly
manufactured, they have been discovered as
dangerous, which can pose significant harm to the car's passengers.
After the boy's death, the plaintiffs filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the manufacturer, alleging that the doorbell cover was a
dangerous product that failed to work as intended and that it was negligently
manufactured and marketed by the defendant.
-- Consumers in Arizona are protected against
dangerous and defective
products by state and federal laws, but
manufacturing and design defects contribute to numerous injuries each year.
A
product can become
dangerous in several ways: through design defect,
manufacturing defect or mislabeling or false advertising by the
product marketer.
We have handled a wide variety of
product - related litigation, ranging from involving allegations that companies
manufactured dangerous drugs and or defective
products.
Claims for defective
manufacture: these types of claims arise when a
product has been defectively
manufactured and that defect makes the
product dangerous
Claims for defective design: these claims may occur when a
product has been defectively designed, meaning that it is inherently
dangerous, even though it was correctly
manufactured
Lawsuits for allegedly
dangerous products typically either claim negligence in design or strict liability in
manufacturing, according to FindLaw.
In other words, a
product that has been properly
manufactured and designed may still be inherently
dangerous, even when used as intended, making such warnings and instructions crucial to their reasonably safe use.
Our legal professionals are committed to delivering highly responsive legal representation to clients facing individual claims and class action lawsuits involving allegations that companies
manufactured dangerous drugs and or defective
products.
At Moffitt & Phillips, PLLC, we represent people who have been injured or killed by defective
products or unsafe
products that have design defects (intended design is unreasonably
dangerous),
manufacturing defects (
product does not conform to the designer's or manufacturer's specifications), or marketing defects (improper or misleading labels, insufficient instructions, or failure to warn about a
product's hidden dangers.)
Whether this means a person getting behind the wheel while drunk, a business owner failing to adequately clean up a
dangerous spill in a public area, or a company
manufacturing poorly designed,
dangerous consumer
products, a victim of negligence may be entitled to recover financial compensation for his or her damages.
Although wrongful death cases can arise under numerous circumstances, they typically involve deaths caused by car or truck accidents; the
manufacture of a defective or
dangerous product; the construction of an unsound structure or building; or failing to properly diagnose or treat a serious medical condition.
In addition, [defendant] asserts there is no separate «failure to test claim» apart from the duty to design and
manufacture a
product that is not defective and unreasonably
dangerous.
Plas - Tex and Tanshaw are said to support the conclusion that a manufacturer has a recognized duty of care to those in its supply chain not to
manufacture and provide a
product that has become
dangerous as a result of negligence.
Design defects: This type of case involves a
product that was
manufactured as intended but the design concept was unreasonably
dangerous.