Sentences with phrase «manufacturers of dangerous products»

Not exact matches

«You made a product that is inherently dangerous and you didn't take the proper precautions to protect people,» Mr. Cuomo said of gun manufacturers.

«The number of product recalls by domestic manufacturers, combined with off - spec, even dangerous ingredients from foreign suppliers, have put consumers on guard about what they feed their animals.»

Some dog owners rely on scaling to take care of their canines» teeth, but taking the pet to the veterinarian for scaling typically requires anesthesia, making this an expensive and sometimes dangerous option, says Bud Groth, owner and CEO of PetzLife Products, Inc., manufacturer of PetzLife Oral Care gel and spray, headquartered in Spring Park, Minn. «Over 50,000 dogs and cats die every year [undergoing anesthesia], and another 1.3 million are injured,» says Groth.

They can also be made against manufacturer's of products used on construction sites, which are defective and unreasonably dangerous.

Products liability law holds the manufacturers and distributers of unexpectedly defective or dangerous products responsible for injuring an unsuspecting cProducts liability law holds the manufacturers and distributers of unexpectedly defective or dangerous products responsible for injuring an unsuspecting cproducts responsible for injuring an unsuspecting consumer.

The manufacturers of defective or dangerous products may attempt to intimidate an individual impacted by their negligence.

The manufacturers of defective or dangerous products may attempt to intimidate an individual who has been impacted by their negligence.

When someone is injured as a result of a dangerous or defective product — including an automotive parts or system — the manufacturers and distributors maybe held responsible for those injuries, depending on the particular facts of each case.

Although products liability law has evolved from the days of «caveat emptor» (let the buyer beware) to the imposition in appropriate cases of «strict liability,» under which manufacturers are responsible for injuries caused by their defective or unreasonably dangerous products even if they were not negligent, the personal injury plaintiff still has a job to do.

We help our New Orleans clients stand up to the bullies and the big guys, whether it's a large hospital that won't take responsibility for a medical error, a business that cheats its employees of their fair wages, a polluting big corporation, a dispute at sea, or manufacturer who denies fault for their dangerous product.

If you or someone you know has suffered personal injuries as a result of using a dangerous or defective product, an experienced and knowledgeable personal injury lawyer can advise you on whether you may have a claim against the product manufacturer or seller and can help you receive the maximum damages recoverable under the applicable law.

This includes negligence claims against subcontractors, as well as product liability claims against the manufacturers of dangerous equipment or machines that are defective.

Those products would be «unreasonably dangerous,» and our injury lawyers can help Syracuse consumers establish the liability of a manufacturer or other corporation.

After an individual has been injured by a dangerous product, they may try to bring a lawsuit against the manufacturer of a product.

Especially in the case of potentially dangerous products such as power tools, manufacturers are required to anticipate a certain amount of wear to the product over time and protect users from potential danger arising from that wear.

Manufacturers of defective medical devices can be held liable for injuries from their dangerous products.

While this most often involves the driver of another vehicle, liability may rest on a manufacturer in the case of dangerous and defective products, or with a government body if hazardous roads were to blame.

The pursuit of claims against drug and medical device manufacturers by injured individuals serves a critical role in holding manufacturers accountable and protecting consumers from unreasonable risks and dangerous products.

In some instances, especially in regards to product liability cases where there may be multiple manufacturers involved in the creation of a dangerous or faulty product, there may be more than one party responsible for the injuries incurred.

If the accident occurred on a dangerous property or due to a defective product, the owner of the property or the manufacturer of the product is liable.

In the state of Florida, any person that has been injured as a result of a dangerous or defective product has the right to recover damages from the designer, manufacturer or retailer of the hazardous product.

A design defect occurs when the entire line of products produced by the manufacturer is unreasonably dangerous.

Under this theory, a person injured by a defective or unexpectedly dangerous product, for instance, may recover compensation from the maker or seller of the product without showing that the manufacturer or seller was actually negligent.

If a manufacturer has not provided adequate warning of the potential danger of a product, the product may be found unreasonably dangerous based on this lack of warning.

New York's laws prohibit sellers and manufacturers from putting these types of inherently dangerous or defective products on the market.

When a manufacturer learns — or with reasonable diligence should have learned — that the product has a dangerous characteristic, there is a general duty to provide a warning of that danger to anyone who uses or handles the product.

When a product is among those categorized as inherently dangerous — as poisonous household cleaners are — the manufacturer of the product owes a duty to the consumer to clearly and conspicuously warn of the product's dangers and to provide clear and adequate instructions for the products safe and proper use.

The duty to warn includes the duty to warn of dangerous ingredients whose dangers are not generally known, if the manufacturer, distributor, or seller knows or reasonably should have known of the ingredients» presence in the product and or their dangerous characteristics.

We secured the first verdict in the country holding the manufacturers of defective pain pumps responsible for their dangerous products.

At issue is whether the Supreme Court should reinforce its 2011 ruling that protected generic drug manufacturers from state products liability claims accusing them of not warning about possibly dangerous side effects.

Defective Products: When an injury results from defective or dangerous products, manufacturer of can often be held accountable for releasing such dangerous pProducts: When an injury results from defective or dangerous products, manufacturer of can often be held accountable for releasing such dangerous pproducts, manufacturer of can often be held accountable for releasing such dangerous productsproducts.

Potential defendants, such as manufacturers and suppliers of the products that contained toxic substances, often argue that the victim's injuries can not be clearly attributed to the exposure to their products, or that the substance itself isn't dangerous.

In this seminar, you'll learn the basics of product liability law, including the manufacturer's duty of care, inherently dangerous products, and warning labels.

So for example, if a manufacturer sold a product twenty years ago and that product is dangerous and defective and causes an injury today, the manufacturer would not be liable if the injury occurred in a state with a ten - year statute of repose.

Plas - Tex and Tanshaw are said to support the conclusion that a manufacturer has a recognized duty of care to those in its supply chain not to manufacture and provide a product that has become dangerous as a result of negligence.

If a manufacturer designs a dangerous product, they MUST recall that item and fix it free of charge!