Sentences with phrase «manuscript so»

You must determine your ebook's marketability prior to producing a manuscript so you ensure your time and energy are put to good use and produce a viable product.

The best way to get started is for Professional Ghost to review your manuscript so its trained writers can give you advice on how to improve the copy and get it into the very best shape.

All an editor needs to do is correctly mark up a manuscript so the ebook developer can apply the correct EPUB type.

You've looked over your manuscript so many times the pages are starting to make up their own words.

pair of eyes on your manuscript so you can make sure it's in tip - top shape.

Use this checklist and template pack to complete your manuscript so it has all the elements needed to become a professional book.

In fact, many of our authors receive a complimentary «spec edit» on the first 1,000 words of their manuscript so they can see first - hand what a paid copyeditor could do to improve their entire book.

You have to first create a manuscript so as to lastly get the attention of one of the book publishing companies.

She was astonished at the book, saying she had never seen a manuscript so clean, almost no typos or grammatical errors in sight.

Rather, you can send them a Word document of your manuscript so the KDP folks can approve the preorder product page (up to 90 days in advance of the book launch).

I'm just finishing up a book manuscript so these will come in handy real soon.

You can only read a manuscript so many times before your brain starts glossing over errors — a professional second set of eyes will prevent mistakes from passing through to the «published» phase.

My objective in this marketing review is to highlight the most important areas for the writer to address in a revised manuscript so as to increase the chances that his or her book will be «discovered» by readers if self - published; or by literary agents, if seeking mainstream publication.

Just remember, your ultimate goal is to get the publisher or agent to request your manuscript so if something in the letter doesn't serve this purpose, then cut it out.

A good editor will work with the author to shape the manuscript so it's publish ready, addressing chapter headings, footnotes / endnotes, tables, characterisation, plot, structure, dialogue and more.

If the changes, updates, or corrections are minor — such as for updated contact information or a few typos — I've just uploaded the changed manuscript so that the best version of it is available.

However, keep in mind that you are responsible to pay for a package and services for each manuscript so cost may be your only restriction.

My goal is to edit your manuscript so it flows with the language, rhythms, and voice that best serve the needs of the story, and your characters, plot, and world are compelling.

A professional editor will work with you to polish your manuscript so it's ready for publication.

So it's better to make sure that is in the manuscript so readers will find it one way or another.

Send a feedback sheet along with your manuscript so that you can collect and document that feedback.

Ideally, your beta readers should be allowed to read the whole book manuscript so they can comment on the structure and flow of the entire work.

you use (blank) word 1.2 million times in this manuscript so get back to work.»

Line editors make suggestions about a final draft that subtly massage the language of the manuscript so that it reads as well as it possibly can, while retaining the full flavor of the author's original voice.

Enter your manuscript so I can pass along the Shapcott Prize baton!

Related to the good housekeeping aspect of a style sheet is preparing your manuscript so that your book looks professional.

It will give exact formatting rules for preparation of the manuscript so that it complies with the formatting needs of the editor and design team.

I offer authors a «sample edit» option — I do an initial revision of a portion of their manuscript so they can begin to see what their book might look like if they decide to work with me.

Or, if you're self - publishing, beta readers help you know how to revise your manuscript so that it's the best it can possibly be before you send it to a hired editor.

I slaughtered my words to get my manuscript so sharp, your man could shave his throat with it.

He also formatted my manuscript so perfectly that it sailed through Smashword's meatgrinder on the first try.

If you find that others arrived at the same conclusions you did, feel free to add footnotes to your manuscript so that you have support for your views, and also so that you can later go back and find what others have said.

The major publishers like Simon and Schuster will not accept unsolicited manuscripts so an agent is essential.

It's like that's the one fact about old apothecary practices that writers have picked up, and they toss it into their manuscripts so often, it's practically a ye olde opioid epidemic.

Even I teach novelists to write news hooks into their manuscripts so they've got something to talk about with the press when the book is published.

Not exact matches

The reason that reading your manuscript out loud works so well is because you will catch dozens of things you would have otherwise missed.

But the idea of building a manuscript or a software company or an advisory firm is foreign and daunting, so it's wise to select carefully when sharing your dream.

«It would have been better to address the issue of Lyons» manuscript directly but I am sure they have good reasons not to have done so.»

Ezekiel 37 (written before Christ with extant manuscripts dating prior to 70 AD) prophesied the nation of Israel being dead so long that «her bones were dried up» and then returning to life.

Scripture is already a theological reality identifiable with Christ, and so the «material text should not be called Holy Scripture strictly speaking, since these manuscripts are only sacred to the extent that the sacred meaning accompanies them.»

Translated I'm not capable of reading ancient manuscripts and take something out of it, so I automatically dismiss it because of its age.

Afterall you just admitted that the manuscript is evidence that Constantine did not invent the divinity of Jesus, so clearly the Bible IS evidence to some things after all.

And it is proven so by a simple study of Biblical manuscripts.

And so even when Roiphe's husband pawned her family's silver and pearls and charted a crass course of negligence — abandoning her for four days even on their honeymoon — Roiphe still diligently typed up his manuscripts and kept their home on Park Avenue, which her mother gave them.

So one day, he ends up stumbling across a manuscript someone else wrote stuffed in an old briefcase.

There are hundreds of manuscripts dating back to 200 years or so after the death of the last apostle.

So do most pastoral and community leaders, whose expert moves may include a new technique for building small groups, the latest stewardship methodology, or the ability to preach without a manuscript («Look, Ma, no hands!»)

If this appears a rather rash statement, it is perhaps worth recalling just how problematic some of these sources can be when questions about the dating, provenance or dissemination are asked: the Similitudes of Enoch (1 Enoch 37 — 71) which contains so many crucial references to Christological titles otherwise thin on the ground elsewhere outside the New Testament (most notably the enigmatic «Son of Man»), is first attested only in a fifteenth - century Ethiopic manuscript.

The KJV and NKJV were translated from different manuscripts than all the Calvinist Evangelical translations since 1901, and those manuscripts the KJV / NKJV used are complete rather than mangled and missing verses, so its very very wise to use the KJV / NKJV.

If so, how do you know that errors didn't creep in to the original manuscripts, especially since we don't have them to verify?