Sentences with phrase «many biblical scholars»

Then again, I'm not a Biblical scholar on human sexuality.

I hope you realize anything that is quoted «Spoken by Jesus» is questionable at best as in the academic world (Biblical scholars) most of what was written by anonymous scribe 200 - 300 years after the event are consider Pseudepigraphic and if nescessary I can supply historical reference.

Please list your credentials as an expert in the original languages to validate your disapproval of the work done by dozens of BIBLICAL SCHOLARS who created the English Bibles.

There's no need to spend a fortune hiring Biblical scholars who don't understand Hebrew anyway, all they have to do is ask a blogger.

There are parts of the bible even christian biblical scholars admit are likely fraudulent.

She makes no effort to engage in the serious minded and easy to find rebuttals of her position by biblical scholars like James White, Donald Wold, James DeYoung, and Thomas Schmidt.

Here's a good site where biblical scholars did their homework to assist you in learning Jesus» wisdom.

There are several other discrepancies between the two versions which are addressed in «Who Wrote the Bible», which was written by Richard Elliott Friedman, a biblical scholar and the Ann and Jay Davis Professor of Jewish Studies at the University of Georgia.

I are a biblical scholar and yahweh is the # 3 dude in the sumerian pantheon with enlil his supervisor and AN the CEO.

Besides, not one Biblical scholar would agree with you.

You said, «Besides, not one Biblical scholar would agree with you.»

Biblical interpretation naturally absorbs a lot of ink; but «modern biblical scholars» will be surprised to learn that many of them regard miracle stories as fictions «designed to influence the common folk of an ancient and more simple time»: a view closer to old - fashioned anticlericalism of Thomas Paine's vintage than modern scholarship even of a radical stripe.

You have directly contradicted learned biblical scholars who have proclaimed an earth age of only several thousand years.

Who would be more «qualified» to read scripture than a biblical scholar like John Dominic Crossan, a major player in the Jesus Seminar?

Here's a great biblical scholar site to learn Jesus» truth.

But you know a lot less about the Bible than Biblical Scholars who have studied the original, Aramiac, Greek and Hebrew texts and a lot more learned and educated than you and still believe: guys like Fr.

Sorry mark, but you have been told numerous times that actual biblical scholars agree that the prostîtute story in john is a fake.

Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, an Italian biblical scholar, suggests that we might begin to appreciate how Easter changed everything — and gave the birth of Jesus at Christmas its significance — by reflecting on the story of Jesus purifying the Jerusalem Temple, at the beginning of John's Gospel.

Most Biblical scholars agree Abraham was a myth, as well as Isaac, and Jacob.

Similarly, biblical scholars since Schleiermacher in 1807 have noted that the pastoral epistles seem to argue against a more developed Gnosticism than would be compatible with Paul's time.

I have to say I am not a historian or a serious Biblical scholar, so am not in a position to assess — or even be aware of — all the various claims and counter claims, but I'm basically happy to accept this consensus.

So Biblical scholars make their best guesses at proper translation.

Any Biblical scholar will tell you that the Bible is not just translated, it is INTERPRETED.

Again, I'm no biblical scholar, these are just some of the things I've gathered from my understanding of the Christian faith.

As all Biblical scholars know, none of the Books of the New Testament were written by Jesus or anyone who ever met Jesus.

The problem I have with most «Biblical scholars» is that they work starting from a series of assumptions that defy history and fact, let alone logic.

Mitch Pacwa on EWTN and current Pope Benedict (University professor (while I don't know if he is a Biblical scholar, speaks 5 languages fluently, concert pianist and remembers everything he read)

Some biblical scholars (including Jewish ones) believe that the Code of Leviticus was intended to apply ONLY to worshippers going up to Jerusalem, and priests and levites going up to the Temple to perform their yearly duties, something similar to the old Roman Catholic communion fast.

It is very simple — you apply the same logic to every other god like Allah etc but refuse to apply the same logic to yours... which in turn makes you an atheist towards Allah... but since you make a exception for Jesus (I should also tell you to read some of Prof Bart Erhman — leading biblical scholar) this already makes your stance contradictory.

But biblical scholars are in general agreement that «Yahweh» is derived from the third - person singular of the verb «to be» (hayah), whether a qal imperfect («he is» or «he will be») or the causative hiphil imperfect («he causes to come into being, he creates»).

steve: i say there are theologians and biblical scholars on both sides, and you say «the bible in no uncertain terms calls homosexuality sin»... how circular is that?

In Jerusalem there developed what some biblical scholars have called «love communism,» which was the close personal sharing of goods within the community of Christians.

And yet, every day, that same Word of God is debated among Biblical scholars?

History is full of people like yourself — yes intelligent, rational and logical — who dove into scripture to rip it apart and wound up being theologians and biblical scholars and Jesus followers.

you guys know, don't you, that there are theological discussions with biblical scholars on both sides of the debate on whether the bible condemns homosexuality and homosexual behavior?

They counsel their readers to disregard secular biblical scholars because such scholars approach the materials with skepticism and, moreover, differ among themselves.

And biblical scholars on both sides of the debate point to scripture for support.

Virtually all of the most renowned biblical scholars of our era — the names of G. Ernest Wright and Rudolf Bultmann come to mind — either have not investigated the biblical theology of nature or have «discovered» that the biblical approach to nature is substantially the same as the modern theological approach.

Many of the leaders of the movement are scientists and engineers, not theologians and biblical scholars.

Some lose their beliefs in theological college, when they are exposed for the first time to the work of Biblical scholars and sophisticated theologians.

I've heard powerful, encouraging things from stay - at - home moms, from conservative evangelicals, from biblical scholars, from plenty of guys, even from People Magazine.

Every Biblical scholar knows this.

A second lesson that Lindbeck offers evangelicals is a model for understanding how the biblical virtues should manifest themselves in one's vocation, especially in the vocation of theologians and biblical scholars.

Only Biblical scholars «know» the true «meaning» of the Book?

Biblical scholar Eduard Schweitzer has said that «for a brief moment the curtain... is drawn aside,» and the disciples are «allowed to see in Jesus something of the glory of God and [God's] kingdom, of that other life to which human eyes are otherwise blind.»

Theologians and biblical scholars have customarily approached such passages under the rubrics of «Salvation History,» «Drama of Redemption,» and the like.

Great biblical scholars have and resoundingly do disagree with your God of wrath interpretation of the bible.

However that may be, the sustained labours of generations of early biblical scholars gradually established certain broad controlling principles of interpretation; and these ultimately crystallized into a general schema, by which the study of the Bible was henceforth to be directed.

Most are not biblical scholars in that guild's narrow definition but theologians, pastors, and historians whose work reflects a profound engagement with the biblical sources.

Generous orthodoxy also means that one embodies biblical virtues as a theologian and as a biblical scholar as one encounters those who come from other traditions.