Sentences with phrase «many accused persons»

Guerin advises meeting with the accused person — who often has not attacked anyone but made a verbal threat against another employee — outside of work hours or off the work site.
They accused another person of being an atheist.
Those who say that are doing what they accuse people who believe in G - d of doing.
It's not interesting because it was almost certainly a joke to annoy some fundamentalist Christian pro-lifer who had been falsely accusing these people of being influenced by Satan.
You should really read up on what honestly / dishonesty means before accusing people.
Even so, why accuse people of crimes?
To accuse these people that are doing their job honestly of the crime of forgery is unconscionable.
If you haven't been seeing Christians threatening eternal damnation, if you haven't seen Christians calling others a «fool», if you haven't seen Christians accusing people of being Satan's pawns, if you haven't seen Christians spread any of the vitrol you accuse atheists of spreading, YOU HAVE NOT BEEN PAYING ATTENTION.
I find it offensive that you accuse people who don't agree with you of lying.
Unfortunately, her reply is little more than a show of concern for herself and her friends, and the fact that we are once again faced with an accused person in a ministry position who spews indigation without the slightest attempt to engage by offering counterpoints or supported statements lends still more credibility to Julie's account.
Have never called you names but you still use bad language with me and that is not fair what ever you are Muslim or non Muslim you have no right to accuse people or call them names before you try clarify the issue patiently but you came attacking calling names it is not for what you mentioned but exceeds it further more is it??
, rather than accuse the person of questioning God, or rather than get angry and storm off in a huff, or rather than tell them to just go read the Bible, the best way to respond is to say these magic words:
Our commitment to the rights of our innocent suspect does have a cost: suffering imposed on other innocent people who are no more guilty than our wrongly accused person.
And let me also say — I watched this couple, in their paranoia, regularly accuse people who had NO access to their ideas, of stealing their ideas, definitely NOT recognizing that the Holy Spirit really does reveal similar things to other people.
You better have proof before you start accusing people.
Kind or ironic when people who think the universe was designed for the sole purpose of God planning to have a relationship with them accuse people of being arrogant because they claim science is a better way to understand the natural world.
The Greek word for tempt or ensnare, which Jesus uses to accuse the people who ask him this question, is a hunting term.
I am honestly not sure, but with regard to religious claims, I «believe» I have enough experience that I can justifiably accuse a person of confusing strong belief with knowledge.
And they like to accuse people who have faith of being self - righteous, bigoted, and unthinking.
Accusing people of being unAmerican, while typically american, goes against the very values you state, Libertiy for all, i.e. freedom of speech.
Fred, I find it amusing that you are accusing a person (David) who has stories of getting clear direction from God in various times in his life, of denouncing clear vision.
But don't condemn and accuse people who want to have a tree.
Then when your question is ignored accuse the person of avoidance and make up wild hypotheses as to why they are avoiding you.
To confuse the matter, they often accuse the person with the understanding / interpretation that differs from theirs of being the one who is causing division.
We accuse people of being heretics, of having broken laws of God and of church.
How utterly ironic — and how incredibly sad — that GES members would accuse people like me of STUMBLING the lost by insisting they believe in Christ Crucified!!
If you're going to accuse people of not knowing a certain subject, you should know something about it first!
The language of the rebuke might have still contained elements of blessing for obedience, and cursing for disobedience, as these were consequences stated within the law (Deut 28), but it is doubtful that God would have accused the people of robbing Him in the same way that He was accusing the priests.
Why should he be called impertinent by declining to supply information which rabbinic law itself forbade the authorities to wheedle out of an accused person?
I do agree with what you say Jeremy and also what Sam said about the way Church accuses people to maintain there satanic control, as we know accusation comes from the accuser himself.
The clergy as judges are urged «diligently» to keep the parties in the mood of friendliness, to take heed of the spirit and past behavior of the contestants, but to bear in mind the possibility that the accused person may have «formerly committed some sin, but is innocent of this present charge.»
Please get your fact right before you start accusing people!
Here is the proof: http://web.archive.org/web/20111122205842/http://www.naturaldelights.com/recipes/snacks/medjool-date-raw-energy-bars Please get your fact right before you start accusing people!
It's kinda lame to refuse to consider things in context, or accuse people of things like «whataboutism» because you don't like the topic.
It's almost as ridiculous as accusing people of being impatient with Arsene Wenger.
Some thing that you always accuse people of.
Dial may not ever actually collect any of that, but the public settlement sure sends a message about watching what one says on Facebook (and, you know, not accusing people of murdering their children).
Smarty Tourtle that means that 90 % of homebirths in US are attended by midwives that are so lacking in skills and training that they would not be allowed to come near pregnant women anywhere else in the developed world, and if you did not know that please learn more before you accuse people on here of being inflammatory.
According to him, even though some police officers were stationed at the court, «they were overwhelmed by the numbers that came to the court to beseech the court to enable these accused persons to escape».
The case investigator was tasked to assist the accused persons get in touch with their relations.
The Supreme Court Justices also ordered that where applicable, criminal Action should be instituted against accused persons by the Attorney General.
At its second hearing of the suit today [Monday], the accused persons who were largely remorseful apologized for the comments and said they would not recur.
Akinjide and Otiti — two of the accused persons present at the sitting — pleaded not guilty to the charges.
At the resumed hearing, Rotimi Oyedepo, the prosecution counsel, informed the court that the commission had amended the charges against the accused persons.
Our utter disappointment not only stems from the fact that the accused persons themselves, demonstrated considerable remorse but also there has been an overwhelming outpouring of both condemnation of their conduct and pleas for the court to be lenient in its judgment and avoid custodial sentence.
However, the IGP in a press release on Thursday, April 6 stated: «We had police officers at the court and we had about 20 officers on standby but, if you remember we gave the accused persons [police] bail when they were suspects and they willingly appeared before the court, so you can imagine that the extent of danger or likelihood of they escaping was not as high as we will believe,» he explained at a press conference in Accra on Thursday, April 6.
Defense Counsel, Barrister Akande Babafemi applied for the bail of the accused person in the most liberal terms.
He revealed that the State Ministry of Justice had filed charges in the High Court against the accused persons and we stand by the pending charges and the trial process already lawfully initiated in Ilorin.
The accused persons, the DPP said walked around to see which house they were going to rob and eventually selected the house of the deceased.
Bugri was at the funeral when the spoke person of the family Rockson Bukari accused people in the party of the death and just Bugri didn't say anything, so why now.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z