Sentences with phrase «many archaeological»

OKLAHOMA CITY — Thousands of ancient clay tablets, seals and other Iraqi archaeological objects that were smuggled into the U.S. and shipped to the head of arts and crafts chain Hobby Lobby were returned to the Iraqi government on Wednesday.

The city of Cusco itself is home to impressive colonial churches and the remains of other Incan sites, a distinction that led Lonely Planet to call the city «the undisputed archaeological capital of the Americas.»

To demonstrate «critical slowing down» as an early warning signal of societal collapse, Downey and his fellow researchers examined five decades» worth of data on Neolithic European settlements published in archaeological journals.

But the archaeological record suggests they succumbed to an Incan invasion only a few decades after the sacrifices occurred.

Violent crime is encroaching on this Riviera Maya tourist hot spot, as well as nearby Playa del Carmen and Tulum, jeopardizing a $ 20 billion a year business that attracts millions of visitors lured by the white sand beaches, archaeological ruins and pulsing nightlife.

In a 2016 paper Gauvreau said other oral histories could be further legitimized through archaeological digs.

In July, King Salman also named Prince Bader governor of a newly formed commission, led by Prince Mohammed, to develop the province of Al Ola, which contains an archaeological site that the crown prince hopes to turn into a tourist destination.

Upon arrival, a stop is made at El Zanjón de Granados, a series of excavated ancient tunnels that serve as both an archaeological museum and event space.

The Bible is proven to be correct by ALL related archaeological findings.

People denied there was a King David until they found archaeological evidence, wise men of Daniels day until they found their names carved into a pillar, etc..

«This brings the genetic record into agreement with the archaeological record.

E.g., the legend of the Exodus from Egypt has no supporting archaeological nor historical evidence

Fifi doesn't understand ANY historical event that is depicted in the Bible, despite vast archaeological evidence — ergo, it must be all fiction.

No amount of physical evidence, archaeological research and field work, or reasoned and rational thought could possibly lead one to an opposing conclusion.

This charge is simply not true, as there is both philological and archaeological evidence for knowledge and use of this animal in the early second millennium BC and even earlier.

19th century, archaeological finds (e.g. earth and timber fortifications and towns, the use of a plaster - like cement, ancient roads, metal points and implements, copper breastplates, head - plates, textiles, pearls, native North American inscriptions, North American elephant remains etc.) is not interpreted by mainstream academia as proving the historicity or divinity of the Book of Mormon.This evidence is viewed by mainstream scholars as a work of fiction that parallels others within the 19th century «Mound - builder» genre that were pervasive at the time.

[«While these claims have been made repeatedly over the last century, the truth of the matter is that skeptics and liberal theologians are unable to cite a single piece of solid archaeological evidence in support of their claims.

4) A final piece of strong evidence is textual from Alalakh in Syria, as opposed to archaeological: a textual ration - list.

The problem with that argument is that with this new evidence they are not making a claim based on «silence» they are basing it on actual archaeological data.

This dating to before Abraham's time seems to be supported by bone fragments and other archaeological remains.

So it seems very safe to say that the passages in Genesis are NOT anachronistic or contradictory, but reflect well the milieu of the period, and are supported by archaeological and textual data.

And of course, what they continue to discover is archaeological evidence of some people, cities, and cultures described in the Bible, but not the supernatural elements of it.

Just as there were letters and sermons that were not known until a few years ago, archaeological excavations have uncovered towns and churches that were wholly unknown to us until recently.

First, it utterly lacks historical or archaeological support, and there is an overwhelming body of empirical evidence that refutes it.

And the lack of physical evidence when that evidence should be there, such as the absence of archaeological confirmation of the Exodus, can be used to reject the historicity of some biblical myths.

@David The Book of Mormon mentions several animals, plants, and technologies that are not substantiated by the archaeological record between 3100 BC to 400 AD in America, including the following: ass, cow, horses, ox, domesticated sheep, swine, goats, elephants, wheat, barley, silk, steel, swords, scimitars, chariots and other elements.

Instead, they assure their listeners of the camel's absence in Abraham's day — without one shred of archaeological evidence.

Mastodons and mammoths lived long ago in the New World, however, as with the prehistoric horse, the archaeological record indicates that they became extinct along with most of the megafauna in the New World around 10,000 BC.

(All proven by archaeological finds).

There are archaeological evidence that cities mentioned in the bible and history books existed long time ago.

Beginning with The Landmark Thucydides (1996), Strassler has produced authoritative new editions of the major Greek historians that include copious maps for easy reference, a continuous chronology on every page, marginal chapter summaries, photographs of relevant archaeological materials, abundant footnotes (always illuminating, never bloated), and a comprehensive appendix featuring learned but accessible articles by prominent scholars.

Anonymity, in the world of antiquities, is often a bad sign, compounding the inherent uncertainty when dealing with texts that are bought and sold rather than discovered in a firm archaeological setting.

Christianity is a form of mental illness - FACT, If you consider written docu.mentation as archaeological evidence, then yes, we do.

(iii) you are a complete blowhard who has never studied one subject of university level biology, never been on an archaeological dig, never studied a thing about paleontology, geology, astronomy, linguistics or archaeology, but feel perfectly sure that you know more than the best biologists, archaeologists, paleontologists, doctors, astronomers botanists and linguists in the World because your mommy and daddy taught you some comforting stories from Bronze Age Palestine as a child.

To test the theory that the biblical account may have depicted actual events, the researchers studied maps of the region, archaeological records and satellite measurements to find a topographical feature where such an event might have been possible.

Keep in mind, there is no archaeological record of many things in scripture; including the often sought for Ark resting on mount Ararat.

There are so many facts that have been proven not only by other writings but also archaeological finds that the bible has mentioned that have been proven to be true.

Call it what you want, it is just more media hype to promote a new, imminently forthcoming book with shoddy Biblical and archaeological scholarship or historical accuracy.

@Kellsey The actual archaeological finds that have been made have been of places in the bible.

The only folks left claiming any «truth» to the bible are: — people who've redefined «fervent belief» to mean «truth» — people who somehow think that archaeological evidence of biblical - era cities somehow proves a miracle - working dude existed therein

Indeed archaeological evidence suggests that reverence for the female as the source of life was of primary importance in the earliest Indian cultures.

There are a number of discussion groups on the Bible and the ancient world and hundreds of Web sites that provide exegetical, archaeological or other helps.

@Ronald: «archaeological evidences that proves the event mentioned in Bible are truly recorded and did occur.»

The book provides a guide to biblical and religious studies, classics and archaeological resources on the Internet.

Skepctics are put to shame by archaeological evidences that proves the event mentioned in Bible are truly recorded and did occur.

So how do those who deny evolution explain the human remains found in archaeological digs, having been radio - carbon dated, in some cases over two million years?

The general credibility of the patriarchal backgrounds is greatly enhanced by archaeological discoveries.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12888421 Some scholars who have seen them say they could be the most important archaeological discovery of Christian artifacts in history.

The Book of Mormon is filled with archaeological impossibilities.

Another element of it is the contemporary Zeitgeschichte which is accessible to us only through the very fauible and fuzzy tools of literary and archaeological history, aided but also called into question by the ancillary disciplines of linguistics, literary analysis, anthropology, etc..