Sentences with phrase «many authors do»

Now we're doing self - publishing, and if people aren't authors they don't understand it.»

The author doesn't know Hoffman.

The authors did not expect to find such differences, either from Theranos or the other two labs, referring to «an unexpected degree of variability within and among testing services.»

But if a given author doesn't make it through that filter, the options today seem limitless.

BookFunnel was started in 2015 by fantasy novelist Damon Courtney, who became frustrated when he couldn't create links for free book promotions; it helps authors do giveaways and build readership.

The author does a great job of educating readers about the role of unconscious bias in a page - turning, interesting way.»

But there's a downside as well: self - published authors don't get the marketing materials provided by the Big Six, and have to work very hard in order to rise through the ranks, establish their personal brand, and attract the necessary readership to succeed.

The authors don't claim this is a negative development; instead they liken it to the «group thinking» of a large office, where people know who on their team has the knowledge they need.

In his online course, «Kindle Launch Plan: $ 1400 in 30 Days & an Amazon Bestseller,» Loper teaches his students how to build a foundation on Amazon and then successfully launch a book even if an author doesn't yet have a large audience of fans.

No predictions were made as to the future habitability of the Town of Tangier at 2100 or the types of habitat (upland or wetland) that might be present, though study authors did note that interior water had increased over time and that present upland ridges may need to be raised in the future.

The problem with a title like «Study links vitamins to higher death rates in women,» which ran on CTV's news website, is that the study's authors did not reach that conclusion; the headline writer did.

The authors do indeed find that industries that generate lots of traceable information have lower levels of evasion.

At the time of this article's writing, the author did not have positions in any of the companies mentioned.

Here's the problem with that analysis — KXL isn't really a level shift in the supply curve, and thus the authors don't actually make the case for there to be any global price effect associated with the pipeline.

The author does discuss the pro rata rule.

The author does not act like a guru.

But it seems to me that one of the problems with academic articles is that the reader doesn't get a chance to comment on the article, and the author doesn't get the chance to read readers» comments and respond to them.

Their authors don't always fully comprehend what it means for an employer.

The authors did a tremendous number of interviews and got some very straight goods from the players involved.

Disclaimer: the author does not promote any of the coins mentioned in the article as better than others.

At the time of this article's writing, the author did not have any positions in the companies mentioned.

I think the author does bring up some very valid points.

Disclosure: The author does not currently hold shares of CVS.

- Robert Mitkowksi, Jr At the time of this article, the author did not have positions in any of the companies mentioned.

- Harvey S. Katz, CFA At the time of this article's writing, the author did not have positions in any of the companies mentioned.

But the authors don't, or won't, deal with it:

Author did a nice job of laying out the case IMHO.

To their credit, the authors do provide thick descriptions of perennial problems in American political culture, but even then they do little to help us get beyond the false alternatives of individualism and communitarianism.

Once again why do you assign character attributes the author did not assign?

The Gospel ends with the comment that Jesus did many other things that the author did not mention as doing so would be too great a task.

He includes references to the Bible for the same reason nearly all authors do, religious or not — because it's a reference the public is familiar with.

I am so glad the author did not let that thoughtless, arrogant professor influence her as she truly has the gift of understanding.

This is not to say that one great author does not uncover important truths.

We don't get to apply meaning to it that the author did not intend.

While that assertion may be theologically absurd, historically ignorant, and psychologically shallow, the authors do have the data to show that the kinda - guy - who believes such drivel may indeed be a large genus.

This article implies that you can not believe in atoms and the wonder of evolution without being atheist or non-Christian, which is simply not true (I feel more theistic in a biochem class than I do talking to close - minded «Christian» creationist idiots, interestingly enough for the same reasons the author does).

Perhaps the author does not understand there are many doctrines in protestantism and as such many definitions of these common phrases.

«The Republicans have there «feet to the fire»), but in some parts of the country that the author doesn't like, Biblical speech peppers conversations — similar to a person from MA who wants to «pak the cah».

It seems the author doesn't want to point out that this is all about the right to proselytize your religion.

the author doesn't say that one can't have an opinion on an issue just because the bible doesn't have a clear stance on it... he's simply saying that it doesn't make sense to have such a strong, skewed and one sided stance on an issue that the bible isn't clear about.

Notice the author doesn't say to pretend your suffering doesn't exist.

The author does not know that 33 koti does not mean 330 million, koti in sanskrit is a section, so 33 koti refers to rudras, adityas and ashwini devathas... The author himself does not know the basics of vedic dharma

The authors did not know then, nor do we today, exactly what Protestants were or what Protestantism was.

I wonder why the author didn't mention the idolatry of Mitt?

Their book addresses Miami's social landscape more than it does Cuban America specifically, but the authors do examine an internal rift that Rieff largely ignores: the Mariel boatlift generation.

This illustrates one of the general problems with the book: the author does not seem to be clear about her target audience, so she includes information ranging from the basic to the specialist.

What authors do you read in your seminary classes?

Or the tradition didn't develop until quite late, and that's why most New Testament authors do not mention it — the stories did not yet exist.

Also, even if the author didn't believe in a god and just meant «goodness» this would still, I think, be talking about a «faith» that good would win out.

To be fair, Reconstructionist authors do not posit a guaranteed cause - and - effect relationship between obedience and prosperity, but it is easy to see in their writings an easy slide into the health - and - wealth gospel.