Sentences with phrase «many chances for a striker»

Those teams actually create chances for their strikers.

As a CM or a DLP he is supposed to create chances for our strikers and transition our defence to attack but all he does is side and backpasses and still loses posession with zero to little pressure..

Midfielders are also contributing by winning balls and creating chances for strikers.

At 29 - years old this could well be the last chance for the striker to get a big move while at the peak of his powers and I feel that the biggest beneficiaries of this Arsenal transfer news could be Roy Hodgson and England.

We could have won, but the midfield didn't create the chances for the strikers.

A better midfield doesn't always translate to more scoring chances for the striker, especially since our midfield actually scores goals as well.

Mkhitaryan could provide big chances for strikers like Alexandre Lacazette, Olivier Giroud, and Danny Welbeck while still being able to receive, control, and score himself from through balls.

Plus, Real Madrid cue up a ton of high - quality chances for their strikers.

With Arsenal, Pato would simply flourish, as players like Mesut Ozil, Alexis Sanchez and co. would create enough chances for the striker to tuck away.

«When teams play good football it tends to create chances for the striker.

The blistering pace of Rashford and his eye for a goal, not to mention the eye for a goal and the physicality offered by Lukaku could see Premier League defences shivering at the prospect of facing the pair, not to mention Anthony Martial and Henrikh Mkhitaryan, who will both create chances for the strikers and even score their own goals.

A goal poacher will be better as no team creates that many chances for a striker as Arsenal does.

Not exact matches

Tell the strikers who start, probably Giroud and Welbeck, that they are playing for a Premier League place and the chances are that they will reward us with goals.

Man U, Chelsea and City will all have new managers who all will look to add a world class striker IMO, whats the chance Wenger will out bid these clubs for Aubameyaung or Lewendoski?

Not only is Sanchez a big boost for our chances of success today, it tells Gooners around the world that our star striker is going nowhere during the last few days of the current transfer window.

I hope this season it changes a striker + cdm we have another chance else I think it's time for arsenal to bring in klopp / simmeone etc (please don't bring how bvb finished 7th) he has done well against Bayern & even in europe

Nothing you could ever do to Giroud would ever make him come good just nothing.Its not a formation set up that gets a player to dribble, score, be world class, be dependable, wow the crowd and the like.Its the players» own ability that makes him do that.Once you don't have it ya ain't gat it brother.Read my lips!!!!! Once ya don't have it ya ain't gat it.As simple as ABC.So I expect this to be another de ja vu case and waste of time if Giroud and Alexis are paired.I'm even shocked it's coming from Henry.He should rather be giving us more reasons why we need a new striker and why we would fail if we don't get the new striker.Forget Giroud's stats for a moment and judge him by how he plays when you are watching him.You would realize that given the same chances at Arsenal strikers who are not even world class can do better.I want a new striker even if not world class and to be honest its not necessarily a world class striker that wins you a league but just increases the chances of winning it.Peace!!!!

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

Reading the thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.

To all giroud bashers, who claimed other strikers would score 30goals for all the chances wil created, man city, liverpool actually created more scoring chances than us which depicts that our midfielders need to create more to meet up with these teams and our fans must stop picking on players to attack.

Still think we need a new striker to convert more of the chances that Giroud does get, but for me he gets the nod over Walcott every day of the week.

Any decent striker would easily have scored more than 25 league goals for Arsenal a season with the number of chances our midfield creates in every match.

He was given on of the best strikers in the world and he set up a team who failed to create a single chance for him.

Wenger has moved quickly to deny this, but he did admit that at least part of it was right, namely that his transfer plans had to change after the Leicester City and England striker Jamie Vardy turned down the chance of playing for the Gunners.

For me I would like to see Sanchez or Theo playing striker but we do have to rotate and give Giroud a chance.

So what would be the chances of Arsene not only buying a top striker, but also forking out for a Giroud replacement.

Morale is down, toxicity in the stands is spreading to the dressing room, pay attention to Ozil and Sanchez and even Bellerins body language, the playing for a lost cause... If I'm Ozil there is no way I'm putting in a similar level of performance I did last season if the «main striker» goes missing for 14 games despite creating 141 chances and breaking the premier league record

This is exactly the type of versatile player that Arsenal need right now, as he can play as a winger or a striker, and anyone who can score 8 La Liga goals in 10 games (while not playing for Madrid or Barcelona) is definitely worth taking a chance on, especially for a price that works out at just over 14m GBP without any haggling.

That means we lose the pace of Danny Welbeck up front, but that can be compensated by playing the pacy Alexis and Oxlade - Chamberlain in the wide attacking positions, with Cazorla creating chances for them and linking up with the big French striker.

Now we know there is absolutely zero chance any of these strikers will want to come play for Arsenal and an even smaller chance that Arsenal would want to pay what's needed.

Not because there was any chance of us actually paying that much for him in the first place, but because it now means that Napoli need a striker and have # 80m to buy one with.

Campbell isn't a striker dumb dumb, he's RW and he creates more chances than Walcott even though he's only been here for half a season and is only 23.

The way we play, these three create a lot of chances for each other and we really don't need an out and out striker.

-- Sanchez: Can handle the opponents» pressure very well when playing behind a striker, has high work rate, has excellent close control like Cazorla and has great vision to create chances for the others.

Giroud is tied on three with Bale, Payet and Morata but the Spaniard's tournament is over and with the Arsenal striker leading the line for France who are now scoring freely I think he has a good chance of finishing on top.

I personally don't, he misses too many chances to be relied on Had it not been for Moses, we'd have dropped points cause he missed a one - on - one, same way we dropped points in the 2 - 2 against Arsenal cause he missed 3 (THREE) one - on - ones I really think we should be looking for a reliable striker, and start considering putting Morata on the bench

You need a striker that can create chances for himself and score against all odds.

Arsene Wenger started with Olivier Giroud as striker in that game, and took a chance of putting Alexis on as a sub, despite only being with the squad for one week.

d term» world class» is used loosely... giroud is a good striker but showed y he can't b trusted as our no9... missed easier chance but still scored... don't care if u sai he's not good enough but since he plays for AFC, I'll cheer him on for France 24/7... when he's at arsenal, plays like a donkey and he turns to s ** troud, then I'll change my tune... OT, did u see pogba??? believe he has gotten carried with d hype «golden boy of France»....

WE need a Costa type striker (Nothing wrong with Giroud) who can score by making his own goals apart from taking clear chances, Additional creativity to fight for OZIL (No disrespect but for 42M he has not proved to be a game changer in Big games — Better players even cost less e.g Costa, Hazard - HE MUST DO MORE) and Cazorla position.

Sanchez is our striker yet no one has created a chance for him in the last two games.

Alan Shearer said recently, any striker playing ahead of Mesut Ozil should score 25 league goals minimum, and it's hard to argue, A top striker for Arsenal would score more than at most clubs because Ozil will give him so many chances.

They're hoping that a certain Italian striker will be willing to kiss his home country goodbye for the chance to play for a legitimate contender!

I'm at liberty to change all 11 if I feel the need.There have been calls for Leroy Lita to be recalled to The Royals» starting line - up, however, Coppell has stated the striker has had chances and not taken them.

All the previous posts on Walcott as a no no striker eat ya heart out, can't wait for Stoke game and hope he gets his chance to squash his enemies Go the Gooners CB

Poor Welbeck never got his chance to play as a striker for at least four games consecutively.

i think we should go all out for Henrikh Mkhitaryan the guys is total quality, the PL may be faster paced but when he gets chances his quality is first class, play Sanchez as striker iwobi one side him the other and giroud as a no 2.

-- Sanchez missed some good chances, but the guy is a beast, and nice to see players put in that effort every game, and he creates openings for himself and others — Giroud is a great striker, but most of his goals are 1 - touch finishes.

It seems a bit harsh as Aubameyang played for Dortmund in the Champions League but those are the rules, so how could the super quick striker have any affect on the chances of Arsenal winning the trophy in May?

The former Newcastle and Chelsea striker was definitely up for it, although young Calum Chambers handled him well for most of the first half, right until a slip allowed Ba a great chance which he screwed wide just before the break.