Sentences with phrase «many claimed fuel economy»

When WLTP becomes the new norm, claimed fuel economy figures for all cars will drop, and CO2 emissions will rise.

Naturally, the new engine is also cleaner and more economical, with Vauxhall claiming fuel economy of 51mpg and CO2 emissions of 154g / km.

Better still, Audi claims fuel economy equivalent to 30 mpg.

Of the engine choices, the diesel - powered 320d makes the most sense, offering acceleration from 0 - 62mph in 7.9 seconds with claimed fuel economy of 57.6 mpg.

The updated convertible will share its running gear with the three - door variant which would mean that the 2.0 - litre four - cylinder, developing 189 bhp and 300 Nm of torque, the 1.5 - liter three - cylinder turbo petrol delivering 134 bhp and 219 Nm of torque, 4.4 l / 100 km, and the 1.5 - litre three - cylinder turbodiesel delivering 112 bhp and 270 Nm, with claimed fuel economy of a frugal 3.5 L / 100 km would serve on the convertible.

This Macan S Diesel has a claimed fuel economy figure of 19 kmpl in the UK cycle which is impressive.

The claimed fuel economy stands at 19.7 km / l.

The price hike from the 1.0 to the 1.5 is reasonable, while the difference in claimed fuel economy is surprisingly small.

Tiguan has claimed fuel economy of 8.1 L / 100 km, compared to the 3008's 7.0 L. No doubt the Tiguan's improved towing capacity and all - wheel - drive off - road capability will see it win favour with many local buyers.

The claimed fuel economy is 14.59 km / l.

The entry level diesel is the 191bhp 2.0 - litre four - cylinder found in the E 220 d, with 400Nm of torque on offer and claimed fuel economy of 57.7 mpg.

The 237bhp diesel, badged 25d, brings a disappointingly large drop in claimed fuel economy figures, only managing 53.3 mpg combined as a rear - wheel drive car and emitting 129g / km.

The most economical non-electrified Countryman is, unsurprisingly, the Cooper D. Its claimed fuel economy figure of 65.7 mpg is very good; especially given the slower Audi Q2 1.6 TDI only manages 64.2 mpg.

For 2014, here comes the XV Crosstrek Hybrid, with a spare - tire well stuffed full of electrons, an electric motor built into its transmission, and claimed fuel economy that cracks the 30 mpg barrier.

This magazine advertisement for the 1982 CJ touts the truck's rugged good looks — emphasized by a couple of models who look as if they came straight out of a Dukes of Hazzard episode — and its somewhat implausible claimed fuel economy.

Claimed fuel economy is 50 L / 100 km (4.7 mpg ‑ US) and the hydrogen is stored as a liquid in an insulated 170 L (45 US gal) tank.

Price Guide: (recommended price before statutory and delivery charges): $ 35,290 Options fitted: (not included in above price): Privacy glass $ 250; Coloured roof $ 390; Satellite navigation $ 2890; Rear parking sensors $ 640 Crash rating: Five - star (EuroNCAP) Fuel: 95 RON PULP Claimed fuel economy (L / 100 km): 8.2 CO2 emissions (g / km): 194 Also consider: Kia Sportage (from $ 26,990); Mazda CX - 5 (from $ 27,880); Nissan X-TRAIL (from $ 28,490); Volkswagn Tiguan (from $ 28,490)

The claimed fuel economy is 22.5 kmpl, which is expected to be close to real - world numbers as it has been tested according to the new ARAI regulations.

When hooked up to the S tronic transmission, it claims fuel economy of 41mpg and 159g / km CO2 emissions for the three - door hatchback and five - door Sportback versions.

The 355bhp petrol - engined M40i gets to 62mph in 4.8 seconds and has claimed fuel economy of around 31mpg, while the equivalent figures on the diesel M40d are 322bhp, 4.9 seconds and 44.1 mpg.

Diesel variants have a claimed fuel economy rating of 27.4 km / l (manual) and 23.8 km / l (automatic).

And, as with pretty much every engine Lexus makes, it's very smooth and refined, and the claimed fuel economy (20mpg city / 29mpg highway for rear - wheel drive cars; 19mpg city / 27mpg highway with all - wheel drive installed) is also pretty good by six - cylinder executive sedan standards.

Despite the extra output, claimed fuel economy improves, with the Combi hitting 49.6 mpg combined and emitting 149g / km of CO2.

Price Guide (recommended price before statutory & delivery charges): $ 36,490 Options fitted to test car (not included in above price): N / A Crash rating: Five - star ANCAP) Fuel: Diesel Claimed fuel economy (L / 100 km): 5.8 CO2 emissions (g / km): 168 Also consider: Hyundai ix35 (from $ 26,990); Nissan Dualis (from $ 25,990); Subaru XV (from $ 28,490); Skoda Yeti (from $ 26,290)

The manufacturer claims a fuel economy of 5.2 l / 100 km.

Based on a week with the car (MY2014), the claimed fuel economy superiority may be tough to realize in real - world driving (especially in the face of the new, more fuel - efficient diesel in the 2015 Jetta, earlier post) but overall, the Cruze Diesel is a worthy challenger, and a very good and thrifty drive, especially on the highway.

The former is the most frugal in the GLA range, giving claimed fuel economy of 67.3 mpg and 108g / km CO2.

The engine is quiet and almost inaudible when travelling at any speed, while the claimed fuel economy figure is well within reach if driven with efficiency in mind.

On the other hand, the 1.6 l diesel will hit the ton in 11.3 s and deliver a claimed fuel economy figure of 22.7 kmpl.

Insurance costs are commensurate with the Virage's hefty list price, and the V12 engine's 349g / km CO2 emissions put the car in the top band M. Claimed fuel economy is 18mpg, so you'll be getting to know your local forecourt attendant very well if you buy a Virage.

Claimed fuel economy (L / 100 km): 7.0 (CVT), 7.3 (manual)?

Claimed fuel economy is 6.4 L / 100 km for the 1.8 and 6.1 L / 100 km for the 1.5.

Claimed fuel economy (L / 100 km): 4.5?

Claimed fuel economy is 10 per cent better than the previous Spyder, at 24.1 mpg.

The benefits are much the same as they are in the Golf: a moderate all - electric range, brisk acceleration, admirable (if misleading) claimed fuel economy and the low taxation prospect of 39g / km of CO2 emissions.

The lower - powered three - cylinder turbo unit, with 89bhp, has claimed fuel economy of more than 60mpg, and you don't need to work as hard to get the best from it.

The engine has 10 per cent more power and 7 per cent more torque with a similarly higher claimed fuel economy compared to the engine it replaces.

Powered by the Activa's 110cc petrol engine, NAVI is quite frugal, with the claimed fuel economy rated at 60km / l.

Manufacturer claimed fuel economy is 33 mpg combined.

Price Guide (recommended price before statutory & delivery charges): $ 41,490 Options fitted to test car (not included in above price): Nil Crash rating: Five - star (ANCAP) Fuel: 91 RON ULP Claimed fuel economy (L / 100 km): 5.2 CO2 emissions (g / km): 121 Also consider: Ford Falcon G6 EcoBoost (from $ 40,835); Holden Commodore Berlina 3.0 SIDI (from $ 43,490); Nissan Maxima 250 ST - L (from $ 33,990); Volkswagen Passat 118 TSI (from $ 38,990)

Price guide (recommended price before statutory and delivery charges): $ 29,990 Options fitted to test car (not included in above price): Nil Crash rating (ANCAP): Five - stars Fuel: Diesel Claimed fuel economy (L / 100 km): 6.9 CO2 emissions (g / km): 183 Also consider: Skoda Octavia 2.0 TDI

Towing is as on a par with the Everest, Trailblazer and MU - X with 3000 kg braked towing capacity, however, claimed fuel economy is 8.6 L / 100 km putting it at the back of the pack.

Claimed fuel economy is a stellar 6.1 L / 100 km and while that is clearly optimistic, our experience indicates sub 8.0 L / 100 km is definitely achievable.

Claimed fuel economy for this petrol powered hatchback is imposing at 20.51 kmpl for petrol only and AGS version, CNG version on the other hand delivers 26.6 km / kg and in petrol mode it vouches to return 19.3 kmpl.

Unlike many claimed fuel economy figures, it's also achievable in the real world, with 7.2 L / 100 km showing on the clock after our first few weeks of motoring.

Mitsubishi is claiming a fuel economy gain of around eight per cent from reducing the engine's internal friction and working on «overall system optimisation».

The S4 Avant, with its turbocharged 3.0 - litre V6, also achieves a claimed fuel economy of 37.6 mpg and 175g / km CO2 emissions, compared with the 38.1 mpg, and under 170g / km CO2 Audi claims for the S4 saloon, although Audi has stated that these figures are not yet officially confirmed.

That's because the 40e's claimed fuel economy of up to 85.6 mpg is most likely to be achieved on short, urban journeys, where the electric power system comes into play.

This kicks off with the frugal 2.0 TDI diesel in the Ultra model — which is aimed at company car drivers with its 109g / km CO2 emissions and 67.3 mpg claimed fuel economy — while topping the range is the sizzling 552bhp RS6 Avant.

That means low road tax and company - car costs, although we've found the respective claimed fuel economy figures hard to match in real - world driving.