Sentences with phrase «many errors in this article»

See an error in an article?

There is one slight, but important error in this article.

However, one error in the article.

In one such example Nestle continues to distribute an article that arose — but without the substantial right to reply given to Baby Milk Action by the publication due to the many factual errors in the article.

The panel concluded that the only unequivocal error in the article by Abramson et al1 is the misrepresentation of the Zhang et al paper5 and considered this to be insufficient to justify retraction of the whole article.

One small error in the article, when you mention about the cholesterol, you state that «the first one clogs arteries», but the first one you mention is the HDL or «good» cholesterol which actually cleans the arteries.

There is an error in your article.

I truly believe there are errors in the article.

There are too many confusing writing errors in this article.

Too many errors in this article.

I have notice an error in this article, A200 is a 1.6 turbo engine producing 156hp, not 2.0.

AUTHOR»S NOTE: A reader has pointed out in the comments below a couple of errors in this article.

These eliminate any grammatical or punctuation error in the article.

There are many more spelling, grammatical, and punctuation errors in the article.

They even created a Facebook page to further perpetuate the errors in the article and enlist more rabid people to their cause.

Small error in the article: it mentions Super Meat Boy made a name for itself on Steam, but it was first a flash - game, then a brilliant XBLA game, and after that it was released for Steam.

In case you spot an error in the article or if you think I've missed a game that belongs here with the rest, feel free to email me and I'll fix it right in.

Please correct this factual error in the article, if possible.

Monckton aside, the error in the article that Revkin corrected is significant.

The purpose of the discussion threads is to allow notification and correction of errors in the article, and to permit clarification of related points.

Can you cite examples of what you refer to as major errors in that article (or were you referring to errors elsewhere on Wikipedia in regard to AGW)?

After the initial publication, Mr. Kent pointed out errors in the article and asked the news organization to publish his written response, but it refused.

There seems to be a glaring error in the article: «Create a system image backup in Windows 10» Nobody willingly uses Windows 10!

(Psst... please comment to correct any spelling, typo, grammatical or formatting errors in this article — since I'm far from perfect.)

I made an error in the article.

I think the error in you article was that starting a business can be an excellent way to make money, but also a far greater way to lose money than buying real estate which to many seems more stable.

Not exact matches

Every day for roughly nine hours straight, I gaze deeply into a monitor while either writing, editing, or scanning articles carefully for tiny errors in punctuation.

Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article misstated when the Chinese government television news channel reported that a driver of a Tesla with autonomous features had been killed in a crash.

Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article misstated the duration of a sexual relationship with Mr. Trump as described by Karen McDougal in her CNN interview.

Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article misstated the parties involved in the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement.

A photograph with an earlier version of this article was published in error.

Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article misstated the number of students killed in the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., in February.

David Pyott had been the CEO of Allergan for nearly 17 years in April 2014, when Valeant Pharmaceuticals and Pershing Square Capital Management initiated the hostile takeover bid described in the accompanying article «The Error at the Heart of Corporate Leadership.»

Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article misidentified the speaker at an Americans for Prosperity event in August.

Prothero, you're mostly right in this article but one glaring error you can't get past is the idea that modern science and failed sciences (religions) can be friends.

Thirdly, although Steve gave no examples in his article of any discrepancies, errors or contradictions in the Bible, those he gave in his February 2011 article on the subject have been refuted numerous times by evangelical scholars.

Apparently you missed the part in the article where they stated that they verified the Bible as a 1611 by it's printing errors.

In the article, Harrison discusses such «difficulties» in the text as problems with chronologies, differences in numbers, non-parallel accounts in the Gospels, the differences between John and the synoptics, and presumed error in the sources quoted (e. g.; Acts 7:4In the article, Harrison discusses such «difficulties» in the text as problems with chronologies, differences in numbers, non-parallel accounts in the Gospels, the differences between John and the synoptics, and presumed error in the sources quoted (e. g.; Acts 7:4in the text as problems with chronologies, differences in numbers, non-parallel accounts in the Gospels, the differences between John and the synoptics, and presumed error in the sources quoted (e. g.; Acts 7:4in numbers, non-parallel accounts in the Gospels, the differences between John and the synoptics, and presumed error in the sources quoted (e. g.; Acts 7:4in the Gospels, the differences between John and the synoptics, and presumed error in the sources quoted (e. g.; Acts 7:4in the sources quoted (e. g.; Acts 7:4).

Here is one of my short articles explaining some of the errors taught in the name of God.

However, the problem with this article is that Rachel indicates one thing in her self - description (being an evangelical with high regard for Scripture), but then does another (acts as if not to be taken too seriously, must be full of errors and issues, etc.).

Similarly, the Reformed tradition has traditionally distinguished three kinds of doctrinal error related to fundamental articles of the faith: (1) errors directly against a fundamental article (contra fundamentum); (2) errors around a fundamental or in indirect contradiction to it (circa fundamentum); (3) errors beyond a fundamental article (praeter fundamentum).

Though the name is correctly stated in the article itself, we apologize for the error on the cover and table of contents.

And as for the Syllabus of Errors, not one article of it mentions democracy, workers» unions or newspapers, and if it rejects «pluralism» (not a concept anyone at the time was familiar with) it is mostly in the sense that any religion which claims to be true, rather than a matter of opinion, rejects it.

Whether it was deliberate or unintentional, I would hope in the future the author of this article would use better judgment or take more time to research the Catholic teaching on the Eucharist (to at least put Sebastian's statement in context) before quoting a statement that is clearly an error to any Catholic that has a sense of reverence («frozen holy wine transformed into the blood of Christ» on popsicle sticks) but could mislead those with simple faith or those who are unfamiliar to the true Catholic teaching.

This article is a scathing rebuttal of any assertion that reform is unneeded in higher education: there are numerous errors in punctuation (eg, «Latino's» for Latinos), capitalization, and especially syntax.

Forgive me, therefore, for pulling you up on one small but rather critical error of fact that occurred in the first footnote to the article.

I think a typographic error was made in this article.

I've never been replied to or messaged about those issues, and no changes have ever been made in articles where I've pointed out errors.

This author should never write an article AGAIN he says «after his schoolboy error was directly responsible for yet another defeat» how was the first game ospina's fault in any way shape or form.

i really can not find any errors from your article from a football fan point of view and am also tired of lying to myself that we have the best team in the world so nice work galen