Sentences with phrase «many fallacious»

For that reason, it's important to realize that security is always, always a work in progress: «The idea that «I just bought security software, so now I'm safe for the next four years» is a fallacious one,» Clinton says.

While Ackman asserts that Herbalife (HLF)-- a $ 5 billion business, second only to the beauty care product - seller Avon (AVP) in the $ 34.5 billion multilevel marketing industry — is nothing more than an irredeemably fallacious get - rich - quick scheme, Johnson insists that his company is legitimate and ethical.

But that's fallacious.»

Not only will it help you serve your clients and show your professionalism; it may be your best defense against fallacious legal claims.

Specifically, it refers to the fallacious conviction — always extremely popular after markets have risen for a long time and become egregiously overvalued — that «they» will be able to stop the good times from ending.

On random telegraph / slack / facebook / twitter groups, you will find links to fake websites, fallacious addresses and useless or fraudulent ICOs.

If you are too stupid to understand the logical fallacy you are engaging in, then I won't bother trying to point out your fallacious reasoning skills any longer.

Okay, here goes: You are engaging in a perceptual bias, a fallacious bit of reasoning, and you have no reasonable argument as to thinking some other species» mental idiocy to be significant in any way whatsoever beyond the mere biological curiosity of their neurological problems specific to them.

Perhaps P is true for another reason other than G. Additionally, you claims about life have purpose is fallacious, i.e. argument from incredulity or common sense.

Not for the communist atrocities those were caused by attempts to engineer society, based on a flawed understanding of innate human nature and a fallacious belief in humans beings as blank slates.

Yet another fallacious teleological argument.

And when I say «using,» I don't mean just pointing them out when opposing debaters commit them - I mean deliberately committing them oneself, or finding ways to transform fallacious arguments into perfectly good ones.

I find atheists just as silly and dogmatic as the fundamentalists they ridicule, their arguments just as fallacious and arrogant.

This fallacious reasoning of yours is quite ridiculous.

as you are well aware «Christianities claims are false until they are proven true» is just as fallacious a statement as «Christianities statements are true until proven false».

-- a large and highly fallacious school of thought crumples to dust.»

What a fallacious argument.

The fact that he converted to christianity just before he died and made unsupported claims, does not make the OP fallacious — the bible was written by primitive people with no knowledge of how the Solar system was created or how species evolved.

Also, please look up argumentum ad populum, circular logic as a fallacious argument, and... «self - sealing» arguments.

Biblical prophecies have been proven fallacious time and time again.

# 2I thought you were the fallacious expert.

Sure it can fred... it can be argued that your god can not give verifiable proof of his existence and therefore it would unreasonable, illogical and fallacious to do as you do and assume the conclusion.

but to over-generalize all poor people and categorize them as you did is fallacious and not true.

How can you make such an ignorant and blatant «over-generalization'to claim this fallacious If / then logic which goes like this... (If) you disrespect (a)(muslim)... (THEN)(they) kill 3,000 people., blah blah, blah... So... If I should go out and disrespect a muslim, which I wouldn't do, but if I would (hypothetically speaking) 3,000 people are going to die...?

So, to say it's not a «determining» factor seems to me that you are throwing out a fallacious universal that isn't true.

I was simply pointing out the OP's fallacious statement about primitive people and the bible.

You can reject that evidence and say it is lacking if you want to, but to say there is no evidence is fallacious.

Sorry awanderingdolt, lordsfreak claims to know what non-believers feel during times of grief and for him to claim that is blatantly arrogant, ignorant and fallacious.

It is clearly fallacious to accept the approval of the majority as evidence for a claim.

Those of you with functioning frontal lobes will realize that the denial of Jesus is fallacious paranoia.

For example, it is fallacious to say that either God is finite or he is not finite.

You make a fallacious claim...no - one can possibly know with 100 % certainty if a god exists, so why bother using the God of The Gaps argument to explain away the unknown?

The argument is fallacious, we are told, because it is based upon the implicit, but false, assumption that

There are many forms of fallacious logic.

You buy fallacious arguments supporting what you want to believe and reject valid arguments that don't.

So let's ignore that fallacious trap and discuss.

Living your life based on a fallacious wager is a joke.

So too are many among the 2 \ % of the population that is homosexually oriented (the 10 \ % figure from the earlier Kinsey Report was fallacious).

Not only that science and faith are of course not antagonistic, and that the popular opinion that «science will solve all our problems» is fallacious, but also that, from a Church and faith perspective, science and scientists must not be seen as «the adversary,» adherents of some threatening or remote activity.

Like the media today, we jump on any story that is fallacious.

The argument — a fallacious one, to be sure — is that man «come of age» has no need of God, or that psychoanalytic doctrines have rendered God obsolete.

But this is just as fallacious an argument as them being «arrogant».

Saying; country 1 is imperfect so it is equivalent to country 2 is fallacious.

So to take your question on: Why should I allow those beliefs to be forced upon me and my family, if I know for a fact that they are fallacious?

Why should I allow those beliefs to be forced upon me and my family, if I know for a fact that they are fallacious?

All so you could introduce completely fallacious straw men arguments we never made (who mentioned Dispensationalism or the Rapture here?)

Most of us could really care less what others believe, fallacious or not.

For much the same reasons, it is simply fallacious, I think, to say that socialism must take the form of a secular religion.

Awww UrLost is so lost that he needs to leap to fallacious assertions and pure stupidity.

However, because people either fear guns or desperately want violent crimes to be reduced and see guns as their cause, they will still believe that gun control laws will actually protect them, as fallacious as that idea is.