Sentences with phrase «many false debates»

The question of revelation is a formidable question in the proper sense of the word, not only because it may be seen as the first and last question for faith, but also because it has been obscured by so many false debates that the recovery of a real question in itself constitutes an enormous task.

«This is a false debate led by hypocrites.

The false debate over discipline reform continues raging with this misleading piece in USA Today from Gail Heriot, a University of San Diego law professor...

They are the representatives of political interests who have manufactured a false debate over the existence of human - caused climate change.

Why even bother with the paid deniers and front groups who thrive creating the delay of a false debate?

The reason it seems a false debate to me is that you can only separate increasing population and unsustainable resource consumption intellectually.

Not exact matches

This behavior has sparked a kind of existential debate within the U.S. news media: How should a news organization respond when the President makes false statements or repeats unsupported claims?

One enormous myth that has been propagated (sometimes innocently, sometimes not) in recent debates over the future of the auto industry is the false notion that auto workers «make» $ 75 per hour.

Unfortunately this comment section has evolved (see I'm using «evolutionary terms») into a debate on whether or not God exists and if religion is true or false, and what religions are right, and who's wrong.

You are correct, if one assumes atheism or a fundamentally different religious cosmology, that the possibility I stated will seem like a false cause (this unemployment came later, therefore that cosmic battle caused it), but again, that would come down to the age - old debate over whether there is a God v. Satan battle in the classical Christian sense (do either God or Satan exist and, if so, how?).

In a philiosophical debate, a postulate stands unless one or more of the supporting premises is shown to be false.

More fundamentally, he says, both sides want to «repoliticize» issues that have lately been taken out of the realm of democratic debate and made subject to a false «technical bureaucratic politics.»

Once again, there is a danger of false contradiction in this debate.

In the recent days I can only take you as a person trying to win a debate by false argument.

In the years after Christ, believers openly debated His teachings, while still conscious of His warnings about the dangers of «false teachers.»

And as far as the Jerusalem controversy, I would suggest that that debate was a good display of God giving a view of how men bring in false teaching, only to have God use his voices to make right a wrong view being introduced to the Church.

That is why true religion is always in a debate with false religion, that is, for Kant, statutory religion.

Harrison also unfolds Augustine's insightful contribution to the science — religion debate, drawing out a number of valuable principles — not least, recommending restraint where issues are not clear, and avoiding bringing Christianity into contempt by arguing for false scientific opinions on the supposed grounds of scriptural warrant.

Evangelicals have turned the debate into a false dichotomy where only one can be true.

In September, Time magazine organized a debate between Collins and Dawkins which touched on all the crucial issues: the false idea that science and faith should be held as not overlapping; the place of Darwinian evolution in the plan of God; the fine - tuning of the physical constants of nature; the literal interpretation of Genesis; the place of miracles including the incarnation and the resurrection of Jesus; and the origin of the moral law within the human heart.

Angered by the new evidence - based scientific view, a handful of disgruntled therapists created a new organization to argue that hom0s3xuality was a choice and create the false impression that the issue remained up for debate.

The science vs. religion debate is a false argument.

Take a debating class sometime and they may be able to teach you all the false assertions you use to make your points.

After Romney lied 27 times in 38 minutes during a civic debate for the presidency, I wonder if they had a serious discussion about «thou shalt not bear false wittiness»?.

You provide a false and negative claim for us to defend which leaves no ground for debate.

I've had many a debate over the last 3 - 4 years here and in many other forums where the «In God We Trust» issue was brought up not only to «promote» but to also, make a false logical leap to... «There «is» a God»... and it is the christian god.

Perhaps it's because the post-modern world tries to apply the scientific method to determine the validity of sacred writings, and that debates about religion invariably propose the false dichotomy of faith vs. science.

But however we characterize it, the chief value of After Roe lies in the corrective it offers of various false or misleading narratives about our post-1973 abortion debate.

With so many misleading advertisements and false claims surrounding the debate, don't allow yourself to be susceptible to false advertisements.

«These speculations are false, unsupported by credible sources and serve no purpose other than to overly politicize the debate and detract from the legitimate concerns of school nutrition professionals nationwide.»

it could be false» debate for awhile and made a plan to give it time to see what happened.

Justice minister Lord Faulks valiantly tried to salvage the debate for the government, telling peers the admission was «clearly regrettable», but it was difficult for him to make the case for the reforms once it became clear the Commons had voted on the basis of false information.

However, members might wish to tread carefully when bringing such resolutions before the House, because in 1869 Rep. Edward Holbrook was censured for «unparliamentary language for stating in debate that another Member made false assertions».

Since then, the debate about how the media should deal with «alternative facts» has only increased in intensity as more of Mr Trump's false claims saturate the news coverage.

And creating so many fake false news that his fundamental mental unfitness for the job was glossed over while media debated his fakes and lies.

This argument was a sticking point through the debate, as Walsh and Byrne claimed it was false but Miner did not recant her talking point.

It is false to claim that there is still a «debate» going on over the origins of the Giant's Causeway, because the creationist viewpoint has no scientific evidence to back it up, and it is completely wrong to portray it on an equal footing with the genuine scientific account.

What I find striking about the mayoral control debate is the false assumption that there exists a wide consensus on the need for it.

The far too often binary nature of this debate helps to create a false dichotomy between a backward, isolationist Britain cut off from Europe and an «open» Britain in the EU which is inclusive and outward looking.

«Instead, Andrew Cuomo has let a divisive debate go on for weeks while the developers of the Cordoba Ground Zero Mosque have been operating under false pretenses.

It's debate, it's experimentation, and it's verification of claims that might be false.

At a recent debate on false balance in coverage, an additional potential solution was put forward by Evan Harris, the former Liberal Democrat MP who is now associate director of Hacked Off, which campaigns for the implementation of the recommendations of the Leveson Inquiry, which examined media practices and ethics.

Young children's understanding of others» false beliefs is at the heart of a debate among psychologists trying to explain years of inconsistent findings.

Duke University psychiatrist Allen Frances, who led the DSM - IV revisions, penned a widely read and debated editorial last year warning that drastic changes to the criteria for diagnosing mental disorders could have unintended consequences, including «false «epidemics»» of mental illness.

I want to debate the ways to make science healthier, more efficient, and more flexible in overturning false ideas.

Heading into the 2015 True / False Film Festival in Columbia, Missouri, the last two documentaries I reviewed were Kirby Dick's The Hunting Ground, about rape on college campuses, and Robert Kenner's Merchants Of Doubt, about the industry - financed «experts» who deliberately muddy the debate over the settled science of climate change and cigarette - smoking.

It seems to me demonstrably false (others can debate whether it's dangerous) to suggest that traditional public schools have special powers to advance and defend civic virtue.

A long - standing debate in education hinges on the false assumption that teaching skills will detract from teaching knowledge; this is a false dichotomy as studies have shown that when knowledge is learned passively without skills, it is often learned at the superficial level and therefore does not readily transfer to new environments.

Whatever anyone thinks about charter schools or district schools, education reformers or teachers unions, Democrats or Republicans, or any other false choice that has divided our politics and our district, let's stipulate that everyone on all sides of this debate are good people who care about kids.

Whether preschool programs should focus on play or academics has been a topic of debate for years, but one scholar is arguing the choice is a false one.