Sentences with phrase «many flaws in this argument»

Yet critics point to flaws in this argument that threaten to stunt rather than fuel China's growth.

I haven't gotten anything wrong, and I and others have already pointed out the philosophical flaws in the argument.

That is the flaw in your argument, you ascribe something which you know or should know can't be ascribed.

@snowboarder — I am not religious at all, but I target with «Truth» that there is a flaw in your argument.

There's one fatal flaw in your argument.

In other words, I can articulate the flaws in your arguments but you can't identify the flaws in mine.

But there is even a flaw in that argument.

Another flaw in your argument is in ignoring the differences in populations and technologies.

There are many flaws in this argument.

If you have evidence that science leads to a god, or flaws in my arguments, feel free to post them.

Hence some aethiest stop sounding logical once you point out any flaws in their arguments because at this point their merely defending their beliefs and not really trying to have some sort of logical discussion.

However, I willingly concede that there is an important flaw in my argument.

Hence some believers stop sounding logical once you point out any flaws in their arguments because at this point their merely defending their beliefs and not really trying to have some sort of logical discussion.

So - what if they accept flaws in their argument (which I usually get them to do), they ignore the flaws (because, as they say, I have the burden of proof), and begin their arguments on the offensive.

With all due respect, the contradiction is a self evident flaw in an argument.

There are so many flaws in this argument.

Argumentum ad hominem is an attempt to refute an argument by pointing out flaws in the person delivering the argument, rather than pointing out flaws in the argument itself.

Gunnerman, all very true but there is a flaw in your argument relating top performance to winning the league.

Even if it's true that the world doesn't necessarily reward good behavior, there's a fundamental flaw in the argument.

Although one of the sharpest brains in the former government, Adonis was blind to the flaws in the argument that the Tories would be bad for «Labour's people».

Others point out the flaws in the argument.

Steven Pinker argues for optimism and Enlightenment values in his latest book, but there are some serious flaws in his argument

Even assuming no other flaws in the argument this pretty much invalidates the whole thing.

Regardless, the most obvious flaw in this argument is that the planet wasn't warming 1,470 years ago.

I think the flaw in this argument is that people with a weight issue generally eat MORE than their metabolic requirement, so cutting calories makes sense for them, and these people also have a low muscle / adipose tissue ratio, so resistance training is essential.

that is the first flaw in your argument.

the second flaw in your argument is that you argue that by eating butter you lost weight.

I think we can easily see the flaws in her argument if we consider how the same logic she employs can be used to argue against schools having orchestras, theaters, and a host of other activities.

However, there is a fundamental flaw in the argument these charter school advocates are putting forward

For me, there are major flaws in these arguments, which I think place way too much faith in the wisdom of crowds (an oxymoron, in my opinion)-- but I think the anger about gatekeeping is an ideological issue, rather than a wholesale rejection of quality standards.

I can spot flaws in an argument, weaknesses in overall book structure, or incorrect grammatical structure; or I can simply catch a poorly phrased sentence or paragraph, an inappropriate word, or misplaced punctuation.

There's one flaw in your argument, which is the assumption that the $ 0.99 price point is the best one to sell in volume.

The flaw in this argument, in my view, is that it ignores the emotional effect that large short - term stock gains may have on the investor following a get - out - of - stocks - for - now strategy.

Finance guy: I think you have a flaw in your argument.

The flaw in this argument is that if No Kill opponents are correct in asserting that an appointment policy will cause intake to go up in other shelters in the area, then we should see an increase in intake in neighboring shelters in every case where an appointment policy is implemented.

I was more or less pointing out the flaws in his argument (the whole basis for this article) in that he said it isn't powerful enough, but then goes on to say that maybe they will look into a Switch version in the future but right now it's not a priority.

There's flaws in the argument in claiming a piece of technology is a long term investment.

The most crucial flaw in your argument is that you're trying to argue «proven» through the use of hypotheticals.

The two flaws in the argument that art needs words are firstly, a painting stands on its own, no amount of words will change what it is, if it can't stand on its own then it is worthless.

[Response: The flaw in your argument is the long response time of sea level.

Even assuming no other flaws in the argument this pretty much invalidates the whole thing.

Why haven't you pointed out the obvious flaws in his argument.?

The fact that you consider the act of pointing out a fatal flaw in an argument to be an attack or a counterattack is telling.

By focusing on thermometer - based land observations only, and ignoring other evidence conflicting with their hypothesis, MM04 failed to address basic flaws in their arguments.

You will never see them congratulate an opponent on finding a flaw in their argument and they will use all of the other signs if necessary to draw your attention away from the subject.

(And, if you find flaws in our arguments, please let us know!)

People who used to find unspecified flaws in the arguments about GHG warming Earth now find unspecified flaws in the predictions of what will happen this century and beyond, all without identifying flaws in the physics or providing alternative explanations of the observations.

So let's see, your last comment claims I've gaping flaws in my arguments, seems to be a bit of an irrelevant premise since you didn't explain which argument has these flaws.

I mean, you can disagree with it, and you can find flaws in his argument, but let's find those flaws and let's have a disagreement, rather than suddenly becoming reactionaries overnight.

There is one glaring flaw in your argument.