Sentences with phrase «many green house gases»

But as the consortium of Asian energy companies that submitted the Canadian project for regulatory approval three years ago weighs it's options in a global energy market now flooded with cheap oil and gas, and further considers the 190 conditions attached to Ottawa's approval, including a cap on annual green house gas emissions, it may be some time before this project crosses the finish line.

We risk harming our own economic position while making only small differences to the global levels of green house gas emissions.

And with the Sun continuously expanding and contributions of green house gases from volcanoes, African termites, cows and decaying trees / plants / insects / animals, there may not be anything we can do about it even if there is an effect.

CO2 from man has been debunked so the definition is being changed to include all green house gases.

Being Carbon Neutral refers to any entity that has achieved net zero release of carbon dioxide green house gas emissions and does not contribute to global warming.

The new frozen - food entrée tray reduces green house gas emissions by more than 45 percent during production, compared with CPET.

So, while I suppose it's possible that the nation's overall green houses gases could slightly decline (which I disagree with), many states» will drastically increase their pollutants as they will be forced to create additional cement.

Cement creation, right now, is one of the top producers in the world in green house gases.

It is possible that the creation of cement will not be as bad as the pollution from coal - mining; however, in regards to «With the elimination of fly - ash alternatives, cement creation will quickly be the leading cause of green house gases» — If it is a top creator now, and we increase the usage, would you not expect it to climb the list?

With the elimination of fly - ash alternatives, cement creation will quickly be the leading cause of green house gases.

Coal mining produces green house gases, it ruins entire ecosystems through the poisoning of water tables and the destruction of forests and sometimes entire mountaintops, it pollutes with heavy metals, the list goes on and on.

Electricity production (including from coal) is the leading cause of green house gases right now, and the best estimate I can find about cement production puts it at about 5 % of the total man - made causes.

When women breastfeed their contribution to the reduction of Green House Gasses (GHG) and water conservation is substantial and an unacknowledged contribution that women make to reduce the impacts of climate change.

By conserving land, protecting forests for carbon storage and absorption of green house gas emissions, and actively managing our lands for climate resiliency we can act as a model for statewide organizations and land trusts.

He noted that though the nuclear power plant is known for high energy density without green house gases emissions and Few Recourse limitations, it can not compare to the safe, efficient newly invented (Green) «EX5» solar Quantum physics energy generator (nuclear replacement plant) which only needs a solar panel for 8seconds.

but, no great surprise the bush family and friends are all about oil (that is a fossil fuel which produces green house gasses).

Co2 is.04 % of all green house gas and increased levels are the result of the sun heating up, as evidence points to the other planets and moons heating up at the same rate.

We hypothesize that top - down forcing, exerted by this metazoan fauna, shifts the dominant domain responsible for methane oxidation off New Zealand's coast leading to increased emission of a green house gas.

«While major green house gas H2O substantially warms the Earth, minor green house gases such as CO2 have little effect....

The livestock industry produces 7.1 billion tonnes of Co2 per year (14 % of green house gas).

Just for one stark example, the bumping and fart of livestock (enteric fermentation) and consequential land use changes (deforestation and savannah burning for pasture) in Australia accounts for over half the nations entire Green House Gas emissions.

The culmination of all the energy efficiency measures is estimated to reduce the Green House Gas (GHG) footprint of Larsen by 5 percent.

It is not that I am trying to scare you, but the truth is that the concentration of green house gases has already passed the warning line; the climate system may get irreversible.

Is it possible to find an alternative for green house gases to save the environment from global warming with the help of green chemistry?

Which gas is being used instead of chloro floro carbon or other green house gases in refrigerator and air conditioners?

Why scientist are still failing to control the green house gases and their effect on the health of environment.

The Bali way of Reducing Green House Gas Emission By Doing Nothing December 2007 During the opening of the 13th session of the Conference of Parties to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), a very...

Also, green house gas pollute the air, make people living surrounding unhealth.

And, Gavin has just reminded us that we have not yet seen the full effects from green house gases already emitted!

It does matter what the cause is because if it is all natural, then green house gases are not an issue and we can burn away like mad without increasing the warming.

Let me explain my arguments a bit better: 1) In Feichter et al. 2004 we describe a modelling study were we run the climate model twice: One run is with estimates of present day anthropogenic and natural aerosols and green house gases (called present - day scenario ~ 1985).

Now our human being no responsibility to our next generation, want to leave a heavy green house gases load to next generation.

CO2 is less then 2 % of all green house gases.

And would likely dry forests to the extent that fires would be widespread and also release massive amounts of green house gases.

If we do not control our greedy, we will suck up whole earth's fossil fuel and left an empty and full of green house gas's planet for our grandchildren.

From what I can tell, there is not much in the way of studies on determining the green house gas emissions (GHG) from non-conventional oil production.

If one country is producing the most carbon and green house gases it will be brought out and into attention, and they will have to answer for it.

The number one green house gas is water vapor, which is over 95 % of all green house gases.

Re Mark in SF @ 63: «If C02 is such a profound green house gas, and it has risen from 280ppm to 380ppm over the last century or so -LRB-?)

If C02 is such a profound green house gas, and it has risen from 280ppm to 380ppm over the last century or so -LRB-?)

With the conventional chip bag, you're taking fossil based fuels out of the ground, and converting them into packaging with the associated generation of green house gas to the atmosphere during that production process.

But when I read «Climate Talks Take on Added Urgency After Report ``, not over my guess Mr Bush still want to escape mandatory cap of green house gas, whether he will change his mild at the end of this meeting, I still have a hoping.

Alexander, certainly you are right, but the question that troubles you, does not solve our problem which is to know who is responsible of the present day climate changes; I fear that changing our Hydrocarbon based economy to a Hydrogene based economy, would send a much bigger green house gas in the atmosphere, I mean water vapor

If nothing else tells you we are in a crisis, just look at the amounts of reductions in green house gas emissions experts say we need to make in order to halt the process.

While criticizing third world countries for producing more green house gases it is more quiet about it's own companies going into these nations to produce.

There is no reason to limit human production of CO2, CH4, and other minor green house gases as has been proposed.

Continuing to increase the green house gas carbon dioxide to our atmosphere results in temperature rise.

Now if CO2 was a really effective Green House Gas I would expect to see similar results: a) Clouds of (invisible) CO2 at altitude — as per 2) above — or at least increased concentrations.

The «Clean Air Act» needs to be amended: as reads «Green House Gases», amend to read «'' Green House Gases except CO2».

There are better and fairer solutions to combat Green House Gases.