Sentences with phrase «many human eyes»

If this idea sounds familiar — OK, even vaguely familiar — that's because De Brouwer was inspired by the Star Trek Tricorder, a handheld device that could examine living things and offer data on activity imperceptible to the human eye.

The human eye processes visual / pictoral information more quickly than words, making pictures of any kind a shortcut to comprehension and awareness.

The human eye can physically perceive millions of colors.

The neuromuscular signals are undetectable to the human eye, so to the outside world, it would look someone is simply walking down the street, when really they could be communicating with the computer system.

It may just be that the human eye is incapable of detecting such subtle resolution differences.

LENSAR claims that its VR technology helps surgeons study 3D images of the human eye, which can help doctors better remove cataracts.

Most regular human eyes can't distinguish those extra 30 pixels, but needless to say, stuff looks pretty good on the new BlackBerry.

Waymo also produced a new radar system that has a continuous 360 - degree view, so it can track objects and vehicles usually hidden from the human eye, Krafcik said.

Recent years have seen the rise of firms such as Sportvision, which sell data - collecting cameras that track movements on the field imperceptible to the human eye, such as the precise path and velocity of a baseball pitch.

Equally troublesome is that the human eye is trained to stop when it reads a period.

The human eye works better from a printed copy.

For example, the wide - angle lens is designed to mimic the way the human eye sees the world so that viewing a Memory later makes a person feel like they are reliving the experience.

It exists to the human eye not as a sphere but as a colored star, as part of the endless outnumbering firmament, as the nightly whispered message that we may not reach what awe inspires us to grasp.

A 2011 Pfizer memo said: «The drop size is not a medical dosing issue because the human eye can only absorb 7 (microliters) of fluid.»

Whether it was answers to the body and movement of water, the mechanics of the human heart and body, the motion of the planets or to discover why birds fly, or how the human eye perceives light and distant images, or why fossils are found on mountains, his quest for knowledge was extraordinary.

There are a wide range of «eye - like» solutions out there, but something complex like the human eye would never work if any of a large number of its components were in place.

@nate — Compare the human eye to the eye of an octopus or even a raptor.

Yes, evolution can explain the human eye.

Yet evolution can't explain the human eye.

«Man's ability to see is in decline,» argues Pieper in that essay, meaning not, of course, the physiological sensitivity of the human eye, but «the spiritual capacity to perceive the visible reality as it truly is.»

Why do you think that the human eye has so many flaws?

Biblical scholar Eduard Schweitzer has said that «for a brief moment the curtain... is drawn aside,» and the disciples are «allowed to see in Jesus something of the glory of God and [God's] kingdom, of that other life to which human eyes are otherwise blind.»

There above all, surely, creative energy awaits us, ready to work in us a transformation beyond anything that human eye has seen or ear heard.

The Blind Watchmaker, Richard Dawkins, 1985, pp: 77 - 78 ----------- — 1) Could the human eye have arisen directly from no eye at all, in a single step?

2) Could the human eye have arisen directly from something slightly different from itself, something that we may call X?

He turned his light on it, expecting to see a small mammal but instead, «couldn't quite understand what I was seeing,» That's because human eyes were never meant to rest upon the South American Goliath birdeater — a spider that measures one foot across, with a body the size of your fist and two - inch fangs.

Zoologist Dan - Erik Nilsson demonstrates how the complex human eye could have evolved through natural selection acting on small variations.

What to human eyes is shameful, weak, and ineffective is God's own glory and strength.

3) Is there a continuous series of Xs connecting the modern human eye to a state with no eye at all?

Then those that are left (surviving genocides and «nature») will get a clue and realize that only God has the ability to create the complexities of the human eye, circulatory system, the fact we have (had) the needed water and atmosphere was not a random perfection that just occurred... will change their minds and ask for forgiveness that was already granted them through Jesus, if they chose to accept it.

The human eye is the (still evolving) product of evolution by genetic mutation and natura selection by the environment.

The human eye is not the product of the Big Bang.

In Israel's experience He became more and more hidden from the human eye rather than less.

It is written on the canvas of the endless universe, as well as in the tiniest particle of the matter human eye have ever seen.

Along similar lines, physiologists believe that the human eye is capable of distinguishing among more than six million hues, and yet the fact that we typically use only about a dozen words to describe colors suggests that we see them much less richly than we are capable of doing.3

They would have to emit electromagnetic radiation in the visible spectrum to be seen by the human eye.

So where did the human eye get information on how to evolve from?

But this mystery is nothing but the hidden dawn of the kingdom of God itself amidst a world which to human eyes gives no sign of it.

The human eye has evolved over thousands of years and has adapted to it's enviroment little by little.

Most famously, Paleypromulgated the idea of God as a watchmaker, who engineered the fine intricacies of natural creation, such as the human eye.

The human eye vibrates at 18 hz or so, and so if you get infrasound at that tone, it is possible to induce hallucinations.

Even complex phenomena, such as the emergence of the human eye, can be explained by studying simpler versions of the same structure and positing some evolutionary succession of events.

For the central assertion of the Christian tradition is that the eternal Reality, invisible to human eyes, has made Himself known to men through material mediation.

The fruit results of inward change that is unseen by any human eye.

Even though, according to Jewish theology, Jews can not, de jure, cease being Jews, they can, de facto, hide that theological fact from human eyes.

Conservatives cherry - pick those passages that support their conservative view of God based on their conservative ego, and vice versa, where liberals are concerned... and there is NO way to ascertain which is true, except on a wholly subjective, personal level, thus it will never be proven objectively, since Spirit, by it's very nature, has absolutely nothing at all to do with the flesh and whatever seems to be happening on this earth, because Spirit is completely opposite, and therefore invisible to the naked human eye, being of the mind only, and therefore unprovable.

A truly intelligent designer could have done better than the human eye.

13 It can not mean any existing segment of society, for while some, at least to human eyes, seem nearer the kingdom than others, none is without flaw or fully Christlike.

I strongly believe that the only way we'll ever come close to the goal of world peace is by setting religion aside and viewing one another with human eyes and recognizing the human struggles common to each of us.

We all know when it comes back with this that no human eyes are going to look it over.