Sentences with phrase «many humans suffer»

«These attacks caused untold human suffering to Afghan families,» said Tadamichi Yamamoto, the top U.N. official in Afghanistan.

It will be a war more serious in terms of human suffering than anything we've seen since 1953,» Mattis said, also noting the danger to the heavily - populated South Korean capital of Seoul: «It will involve the massive shelling of an ally's capital, which is one of the most densely packed cities on earth.»

Dean Kamen wants to relieve human suffering.

[However,] humans all suffer from Cognitive Bias, that is, unconscious — and irrational — brain processes that literally distort the way we see the world.»

«It will be a war more serious in terms of human suffering than anything we've seen since 1953.

«The extent of human suffering here,» he says, «is pretty intense.»

Human suffering anywhere concerns men and women everywhere.

In the immediate aftermath of any disaster, information plays a key role in curbing unnecessary human suffering.

That's a massive amount of human suffering that our Wall Street Con Men friends caused with their relentless promotion of the smelly Buy - and - Hold garbage.

For decades, the diamond industry has been tainted by the fact that the quest for diamonds has often led to violence, warfare, and human suffering.

The risks of a highly depressed economy, and the type of human suffering that is the result of it, arguably outweigh whatever negative side effects aggressive central bank policy create.

On top of the obvious human suffering caused by crushing debt, the fact that more than a fifth of the mortgages in this country are underwater is a huge drag on the economy.

Humans suffer from a host of cognitive shortcomings that can make us do really dumb things sometimes.

The usual roundaround answers from a pastor to human suffering, i.e. god knows what he's doing, so keep quiet., or that god favors some for reward and let others die.

With the victims of lung cancer we have the good sense to respond at the point of human suffering rather than the point of moral judgment.

In the face of human suffering the moral character of the sufferer is irrelevant to the demand of the gospel for a compassionate response.

The gospel of John sees the passion as the ultimate revelation of the Son's glory, while Matthew focuses more on Jesus's human suffering.

Jesus alone makes sense in human suffering.

It is not hard to imagine the common sense reaction to the news that a distinguished historian had attempted to cover the history of human suffering in a little over two hundred pages.

My point was that God does not cause all human suffering described in that post.

I find it interesting that justice systems place a monetary value on human suffering and on life.

Then you might understand that Christian god as described in the bible is not loving, doesn't give a hoot about human suffering, and in fact does not exist.

There is no such thing as «god,» and I would say that many humans suffer from mental illness or mental deficiency when it comes to religion.

People do not care enough about human suffering to turn from their rebellion against God and from their sins and turn back to God.

How about to improve life on this planet and reduce as much human suffering as possible?

This mystery is richly captured in John Allen's description of John Paul as «a living symbol of human suffering, in effect, an icon of Christ on the cross.»

It would be better, we think, to use the new means at hand to reduce human suffering as much as we can while protecting human freedom and dignity.

We can be very defensive about the stupidest of things while ignoring the real issues of the world (I.e. Human suffering).

A person's voluntary encounter with human suffering should always be viewed as a cry of protest and a testimony of hope against the overwhelming evil that one experiences.

All humans suffer somehow at some point in their lives.

When you find yourself in front of human suffering, you have to do what your heart brings you to do.

If Christians must choose between thinking clearly and relating rightly to human suffering, they must choose the latter.

And it's hard enough to cope with human suffering without worrying about the suffering of other animals.

For some conservative Catholics he is the authentic voice of the medieval Church; for many liberal atheists he is an authentic voice of human suffering and hope.

27 % of American humans suffer from indefensible mental myopia.

Just this: that, far from being unconcerned about the human plight, the Church Fathers were motivated by their theology of salvation in upholding doctrines of divine immutability and impassibility (God's transcendence of human suffering and passions).

The argument of this sermon was open to criticism on the ground that the preacher seemed to take for granted a highly debatable view of the redemptive value of human suffering; yet he was calling attention to something very important, namely, that if we quote Baxter's words as Professor Lampe has done, we must not forget that the scope of Christ's suffering is limited.

Can you explain why a God would allow human suffering?

D. Green, one «reason» why God allows human suffering is because nothing in this life is mortal, everything is fragile, life, human beings are the most sophisticated species on this planet, yet we easily perish via illness, disease, ect.

I would suggest that since we are in a very junior position in the universe, men might do better to set their hands and hearts to tasks that cry out to be done, instead of posing everlasting whys before they are willing to work to alleviate human suffering and needs.

Thus a good deal of human suffering can be directly traced to the evil choices of human beings.

Eliminating human suffering is obviously not priority # 1 or there would be none (odd, for an omnibenevolent being).

It can be called «pie in the sky,» the «opium of the people,» and doubtless it has been used as an anodyne for much preventable human suffering and exploitation.

The relief of human suffering, of whatever kind, the liberation of human beings from fear, ignorance and evil, the compassionate use of human talents and personality — all these are shown to be of the highest importance.

Obviously, that constitutes unspeakable human suffering, as well as a devastating blow to a «gay community» that aspires to be the motor force of social - sexual revolution.

In a century that had seen two hideous world wars and innumerable examples of massive human suffering, John Paul established a new Feast of Divine Mercy, giving men and women a practical means of accessing the forgiveness of a loving God.

Nobody knows, but one has to question why a God would sit back and allow human suffering for all this time.

The religious intellectuals of India wanted to relieve human suffering, and this could even lead to governmental action, but they did not envision fundamentally different ways of organizing society.

Weinandy is particularly effective in explaining why it is precisely the impassability of God that makes both possible and coherent the incarnation of the Son of God, the second person of the Holy Trinity, in Jesus, by which incarnation God experiences and overcomes human suffering as a human being.

We have eternal beings and god sends a «son» for a few years, only a few days of which are really bad (and no worse than many humans suffer) and then takes him back for the rest of eternity.