Sentences with phrase «many irresponsible owners»

Animals are considered individuals, unlike humans, animals have a handicap since they are unable to report the abuse that they receive from the irresponsible owners.

The irresponsible owner seemed unconcerned about his fate, saying that she had several other kittens!

More is the pity, when a bad reputation attracts irresponsible owners and breeders.

Show how irresponsible owners help create negative perceptions & how society can change that perception

That doesn't make them irresponsible owners, that doesn't make them bad people, that doesn't make them poor.

People forget that it's not the breed, it's the irresponsible owners; those who breed and train them for protection or fighting are the culprits who made American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, American Bulldog and other large, strong breeds the menace of society.

Yes, dangerous and irresponsible owners often like big dogs, dogs that are muscular, dogs that are strong.

or should the finger of blame really be pointed at irresponsible owners?

yes it is the case that irresponsible owners are more likely to own these dogs because they get the dogs for their reputation.

It is so unnecessary that these poor sweet souls are being put to sleep because of puppy mills... backstreet breeders, irresponsible owners etc..

So, the argument «no bad dogs, only irresponsible owners» isn't going to work with me.

Irresponsible owners have to feel the cost of negligent, irresponsible and abusive ownership through STIFF monetary penalties and loss of pet ownership rights.

Wow, do you think it could be the irresponsible owner and / or environment that's the issue???

The more popular the breed (for whatever reason) the lower the quality of breeding tends to be and more irresponsible owners own dogs belonging to that breed.

And anyone who puts a pet before the safety of people is an irresponsible owner.

Are dangerous and irresponsible owners just incredibly likely to own these particular dog breeds?

It seems like the sample of owners used to create this claim are already very likely irresponsible owners avoiding accountability in the face of very serious legal battles.

Fear and bad publicity are pushing responsible breeders out of the pit bull business, said Lockwood, leaving less - scrupulous breeders to pander to irresponsible owners who want to buy a mean dog.

Animal control, do not allow the same irresponsible owner to regain custody of a dangerous dog.

The majority of animals at several of my area shelters result from one reason: pet overpopulation, i.e. irresponsible owners not spaying / neutering their pets.

Such laws would not be flexible enough to cover the next set of problem dogs and would do nothing to control irresponsible owners.

Clara Gunde, another committee member and executive director of the Central Brevard Humane Society, said raising fines is one of the best ways to put pressure on irresponsible owners.

I have to agree that owners are  1/2 the equation and that the irresponsible owners are the ones most likely involved where there are dog - bite incidents.

Honestly, breeders aren't even contributing to overpopulation nearly as much as irresponsible owners / strays just roaming loose and breeding indiscriminately on their own.

irresponsible owners are.

«Banning pit bulls is a quick fix that doesn't really address the root of the problem — irresponsible owners,» Lockwood said.

As well, irresponsible owners may abandon cats in areas where outdoor populations already exist.

It is always said by officials that irresponsible owners will be the ones to be targeted but this is never the case.

And I am concerned about ANY uneducated law being passed by UNEDUCATED POLITICIANS who have either no clue as to the real problems of IRRESPONSIBLE owners, or who refuse to want to solve it properly.

There will always be strays on the road and too many dogs at the animal shelter, because irresponsible owners don't spay or neuter their pets, Paula says.

PAULA DUPONT: There will always be stray dogs on the road and too many dogs at the animal shelter because the original owner of the dog that got pregnant and produced the puppies, that was the irresponsible owner.

Shelters could help by posting stray pictures online, but many still don't - blaming the «irresponsible owner» for losing their dog.

Punish the irresponsible owners and make an example out of them, (not innocent dogs and responsible owners), when specific situations and incidents arise within Dayton city limits.

We do have a serious problem with irresponsible owners, and we can't make it unreasonable for them to take their animals to shelters and animal control facilities... We need to make things a little bit easier for people to help, not just make it easier for them to --» [lost audio]

Its a sad fact that the original Pit Bulls were bred to fight, and some mind - bogglingly irresponsible owners treated these animals with unspeakable cruelty.

Across the world, there are many dogs waiting to be put down in kennels as a result of the malpractice of irresponsible owners.

The reality is that between puppy mills and irresponsible owners, the misery, suffering and death is guaranteed to continue for many years to come, especially if people buy into the ridiculous notion that it's bad for your dog to do the humane and responsible thing and have it spayed or neutered.

oh and lastly, an irresponsible owner probably wouldn't pay to get theie animals neutered at the vets anyway so really the type of neglectful behaviour you feel you are stopping by butchering pets isn't really going to stop is it?thats an issue with part of humanity which our pets are paying the ultimate price for.

In my opinion both partner and myself have owned several different breeds of dogs including crossbred dogs, and have always considered that there is no such problem as a dog problem only an irresponsible owner.

If anyone should be persecuted for the tragic events that have recently taken place, it should be the irresponsible owners.

There is an issue at hand that needs immediate attention, it is concerning the way in which we discard animals who are left homeless from irresponsible owners, and end up in rabies control or animal shelters and killed by the use of a gas chamber.

First, in answer to your question, as a person who has worked in animal rescue in the U.S. and have 5 dogs because of irresponsible owners, when we really can only afford 3, I would love to see that day.

Therefore, the source of excess animals - ones not requested by the \ «market \» - have to come from strays and from irresponsible owners of non-neutered or non-spayed animals which get lose and breed.

Dogs and cats are «breeding» right now in backyards, back alleys, fields, barns, basements, garages, and everyplace else in America where irresponsible owners let there unneutered / unspayed animals run loose.

Her first dog was a Pit Bull Mix named Foster, who was rescued from irresponsible owners.

Most affected by such a ban are the easy - to - find, licensed family dogs owned by responsible people, not the unlicensed dogs of irresponsible owners and criminals.

For years, experts have said that if you focus on breeds, or types of dogs, that irresponsible owners, or people who want aggressive dogs, will turn to other breeds.

Like so many shelters with animal control contracts, the TC SPCA would rely on the fiction that the only solution to pet overpopulation is the «blue solution,» and continue to blame «irresponsible owners» for the fact that so many animals would go out the door in barrels rather than in the loving arms of families.

Like so many shelters with animal control = contracts, the Tompkins County SPCA would rely on the fiction that = the = 20 only solution to pet overpopulation is the «blue solution,» and continue = to = 20 blame «irresponsible owners» for the fact that so many animals would go = out the = 20 door in barrels rather than in the loving arms of families.

After the third repeated offence, these irresponsible owners will be asked to remove their cat for rehoming.