Sentences with phrase «many judicial review»

It is common, with respect to regionally significant planning applications in Northern Ireland, to have multiple legal challenges, including judicial reviews.

A judicial review («JR») is a type of court proceeding in which a judge reviews the lawfulness of a decision or action made by a public body; they are a challenge to the way in which a decision has been made, rather than the conclusion reached.

Trump tweets a call for an expedited judicial review of his revised travel ban following Saturday's terrorist attack in London.

«We have a strong case for judicial review and we will immediately commence that process.»

International passengers arrive at Washington Dulles International Airport after the U.S. Supreme Court granted parts of the Trump administration's emergency request to put its travel ban into effect later in the week pending further judicial review, in Dulles, Virginia, U.S., June 26, 2017.

Jan. 17, 2014: First of 10 applications filed in Federal Court and the Federal Appeal Court by environmental and First Nations groups seeking judicial review of panel recommendation to approve project.

Here's why: Chapter 19 allows Canada to bypass the U.S. judicial review process when the U.S. government imposes antidumping and / or countervailing duties on Canadian products imported into the United States, as has been the case repeatedly with softwood lumber, for example.

Yet, unlike MBOs, in a dual class recapitalization, management neither pays for voting control nor is its conduct subject to meaningful judicial review.

Dagny, How is introducing legislation that would give states carte blanche to have school prayer, gay marriage bans, abortion bans (all goalsof Ron Paul) without judicial review, pro liberty?

These include statutory rights of appeal, judicial review and scrutiny by independent panels and tribunals, such as the Process Review Panel, the Ombudsman and the Independent Commission Against Corruption.

Kinder Morgan said it had previously announced a «primarily permitting» strategy for the first half of 2018, focused on advancing the permitting process, rather than spending at full construction levels until it obtained greater clarity on outstanding permits, approvals and judicial reviews.

While judicial review still occurs in many of the Fed's regulatory determinations, in places where value judgments are of the most consequence, the Fed's lawyer is the first and last word on what the law allows or forbids.

And in the crisis, emergency decisions were made that have been effectively removed from judicial review, including violations of state corporate law and issues raised by the Constitution.

Those earlier tariff cases gave US importers and other interested persons an opportunity to argue whether such added duties are justified and an opportunity to seek judicial review of agency decisions.

The judicial review is being brought against Liam Fox, Secretary... Read more

55 (1) Judicial review by the Federal Court of Appeal with respect to any order made under subsection 54 (1) is commenced by making an application for leave to the Court.

Various judicial review and appeal applications have been launched with respect to both the JRP Report and the decision of the Governor in Council.

Section 54 of NEBA provides that the cabinet decision is amenable to judicial review (not the appeal with leave mechanism):

James Bradley Thayer warned nearly a century ago that «common and easy resort» to judicial review would tend «to dwarf the political capacity of the people, and to deaden its sense of moral responsibility.»

While judicial review is vital to safeguard our constitutional freedoms, a degree of moral and philosophical discussion flowing from constitutional litigation can not justify the costs that overreaching judicial rights declaration has for public debate and democratic governance.

An ambitious vision of the Supreme Court and constitutional judicial review as serving the ends of public virtue is without legal justification, except as bound tightly to the values incorporated into our national charter.

Granting the Supreme Court supremacy in conducting discourse about values through the mechanism of judicial review disempowers the people from full participation in their government and their communities.

Michael J. Perry, a leading legal scholar, argues that judicial review should serve the role of «prophecy,» calling us to a deeper understanding of ourselves through moral exhortation by the Supreme Court.

It alone can grant or deny tax exemptions (subject to judicial review).

What does Christian thought bring to the issue of judicial review?

But Christians also should think theologically about the overall institution of judicial review, its promises and dangers.

The power of a court to invalidate unconstitutional laws — «judicial review» — has been a feature of our government from the outset.

Readers of First Things should by now be well - acquainted with the heated national debate - in part inspired by these very pages - over the role and legitimacy of the modern Supreme Court, armed with the power of judicial review, in a country that proclaims itself to be self - governing.

Approximately 15 students were allowed to re-join St Olave's to continue their studies this term after some mums and dads threatened a judicial review.

A hearing to determine whether a judicial review will be granted is due to take place on 20th September.

Whereas the earlier Canadian Bill of Rights of 1960 had only a statutory basis and was thus effectively beyond the scope of judicial review, the new Charter was an entrenched constitutional document similar to that of the United States.

The primary concern of Brutus is that judicial review is a stealth weapon implicit in the idea of a written Constitution that would be used by the evildoing Federalists to dispower the states.

Even the account of judicial review (sort of) in FEDERALIST 78 appears to be mainly a response to the Anti-Federalist author Brutus.

On a completely unrelated matter, did anyone else notice that Roberts voted to strike down the federal Stolen Valor Act on the same day Michael Knox Beran thinks John Roberts taught us all a valuable lesson about how judicial review should only very, very rarely be used?

The least we can say is that JUDICIAL REVIEW as a tool for containing the relatively tame national legislature described in FEDERALIST 10 is not a prominent theme in THE FEDERALIST.

The law can speak in profoundly religious ways, especially in matters undergoing judicial review.

Second, judicial review under the Constitution makes possible the entry of natural law theory into litigation.

The democracy they devised was a republican system of limited government, with checks and balances, including judicial review, and representative means for the expression of the voice of the people.

Matters rapidly deteriorated thereafter with the elected (i.e. non-Foundation) parent governors, supported by the VPAG, seeking a Judicial Review through the Courts, and now, after that having been dismissed, going to the Supreme Court.

Dismissing the claim for judicial review, the judge said: «I have much sympathy for the claimants, and I fully understand their reasons for wishing to pursue this line of inquiry.

The parent has applied for a judicial review of the case, after authorities refused to issue a birth certificate with a gender designation.

She said that after weighing the facts of this case she decided to dismiss Mr Ngole's claim for judicial review.

The CU are applying for a judicial review.

The importance of the second and third issues is obvious for decisions about a written constitution, which later was interpreted as involving judicial review of acts of Congress, and for a federal union of states having partial autonomy under a national government.

It's bringing a judicial review against minister's proposals to make independent schools challenge prejudice against other faiths.

But as Pete noticed, the president actually went further, suggesting that judicial review of the substance of acts of Congress is unconstitutional.

As my review explicitly says, much of Powell's book «attacks the secular myths by which we idolize the Constitution and the Court,» and it prefers the «corrigibility» of electoral politics to the «pretensions» of judicial review.

Instead I'll point out what Father Neuhaus, irresponsibly, never mentions: a major theme of both Powell's book and my article is that the Court can and does abuse the power of judicial review.

We also oppose provisions of the bill that expand the immigration detention system and erode the basic rights afforded to immigrants, including the provisions that allow for the indefinite detention of individuals who can not be deported to their home countries; that expedite removal proceedings or automatically imprison immigrants without providing them access to attorneys or judges; that increase detention capacity by an additional 20,000 beds to house immigrants awaiting their day in court; and that diminish the checks and balances of judicial review over immigration decisions.

Whatever Marbury was supposed to mean about the scope of the power of judicial review, it is a notable fact that the Court declined to exercise that power to declare another act of Congress to be unconstitutional until 1857, when it ruled in the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford.