Sentences with phrase «many logical fallacies»

There is another logical fallacy that has largely been ignored by proponents of legalizing marijuana.

«Abusive narcissists and sociopaths employ a logical fallacy known as «moving the goalposts» in order to ensure that they have every reason to be perpetually dissatisfied with you.

Unfortunately, we drifted away from the actual question, dreamed about a logical fallacy and refuted an argument that was never made.

This is a logical fallacy, not «fair commentary».

The «Argumentum ad Rogerum» is a logical fallacy used frequently by Bitcoin Core zealots, charlatans & socks to shift the discussion of BCH / BTC from philosophy, economics and technology to the character of Roger Ver.https: / / t.co / 37KdArSs9f

If you are too stupid to understand the logical fallacy you are engaging in, then I won't bother trying to point out your fallacious reasoning skills any longer.

Logical fallacies like there is a such thing as a «Borderline Sexual Assault», I would have to point out the obvious that there is either assault or not assault in this world.

It's a logical fallacy, google no true scotsmen.

Try googling «logical fallacies» and see why I laugh at most of your posts.

(nothing can create itself, that is a logical fallacy)

Other than that, congratulations, that was the finest example of the logical fallacy known as an «Argument from Ignorance» that I have seen in a long time.

First of all, it's a logical fallacy — the argument from popularity.

«nothing can create itself, that is a logical fallacy» is a true statement.

Next you'll be pointing to Science as an explanation for the creation of the Universe; which all intelligent educated people realize is a logical fallacy.

But, the fact that we don't know does not mean we must suddenly come to the conclusion that is MUST be god — that's a logical fallacy — the argument from ignorance.

Actually, it's not a logical fallacy.

@ David By definition, Michael isn't actually a troll, since all of his arguments are logic - based arguments and pretty reasonable considering his standpoint, unlike the gross logical fallacies put forth by Cecilia Davidson (ULTIMATE ABILITY: you're wrong about everything because you're a bigot.

Actually, there are at least five or six logical fallacies in Pascal's wager, but there no sense in reciting them.

Jamie, your «fact» and entire argument is nothing but a logical fallacy known as an «argumentum ad ignorantiam».

I have never found a single one of his arguments that wasn't either a logical fallacy or an obvious misuse of math.

That's a logical fallacy known as «Negative Proof», look it up and educate yourself.

This is the logical fallacy of the False Dilemma, avoiding a number of other possibilities.

This is a logical fallacy known as «Argumentum Ad Populum» aka the Bandwagon fallacy.

You are using an «argument form ignorance» which is a logical fallacy.

< > Assuming Jesus actually said that and it wasn't added by the early Catholics at the Council of Nicene < > This is the logical fallacy of the False Dilemma, avoiding a number of other possibilities.

@ME II: Live4Him: «since the stated premises are generally accepted by all» This is a logical fallacy called argumentum ad populum.

I already explained why these quotes are nothing more than card - stacking (a propaganda technique) and an attempt to use an appeal - to - authority logical fallacy.

What you have here is a logical fallacy known as an «appeal to authority.»

The historian must sort out the major contrasts, identify levels of relative abstraction, and take note of configurations that remain potential in order to avoid the logical fallacies and stylistic shortcuts noted in the first part of this paper.

@AE: «I already explained why these quotes are nothing more than card - stacking (a propaganda technique) and an attempt to use an appeal - to - authority logical fallacy.»

And here we have the «No true Scotsman» logical fallacy, yet another rationalization.

Post hoc ergo propter hoc, Latin for «after this, therefore because of this,» is a logical fallacy... Post hoc is a particularly tempting error because temporal sequence appears to be integral to causality.

For professed logical and rational thinkers to fill their opinions with logical fallacies renders any argument suspect.

The whole «scientists» thing is a logical fallacy known as appeal to authority.

Its also nice to point out the logical fallacies they use.

I'd be fine if the cartoon was lampooning an actual conservative belief or pointing out a real logical fallacy of conservative thought; but this doesn't seem to be doing that.

It is this false claim made by so many, particularly in more fundamental religious communities, that is being challenged by this simple illustration of the logical fallacy of such a view.

Johnathan: I think that almost all cartoons contain logical fallacies... that is one major reason we find them funny....

Look up «No True Scotsman» it's the logical fallacy you are engaging in.

I do believe it is a logical fallacy to state that homosexuality is always environmental yet heterosexuality is never environmental.

Therefore, I think we should laugh and enjoy the logical fallacies that make these cartoons so very interesting... and often the start of a great conversation and exchange of viewpoints.

Further, this also falls under the logical fallacy «Appeal to Ignorance.»

See my post, way above, for the logical fallacy in the cartoon.

There's a logical fallacy in the cartoon.

The clear logical fallacy is in their insistence that environment and / or choice had nothing to do with them being straight.

I can show that the bible has hundreds of contradiction, inconsistencies, logical fallacies and very little of it is based in any sort of reality.

Saying (or even implying) that Jesus» silence in the Synoptics is tantamount to an absence of clear teaching is to engage in the logical fallacy of «reasoning from silence,» which is built upon shaky rationality.

@Jim: We have all tried, but apparently TheCapitalist is not allowed to review the list of logical fallacies we have provided him.

(This is the part where Cappy does the «cut and paste» from something he posted earlier that was pounded by everyone as unverifiable dribble, or logical fallacies).

My point was that you were making logical fallacy by attacking your opponent instead of attacking their argument, which is called an Ad Hominem fallacy.