Sentences with phrase «many logical inconsistencies»

This single concept is riddled with a plethora of logical inconsistencies.

I see no logical inconsistency in my belief — I find it consistent.

This is where Christians face some logical inconsistencies in their faith that are pretty hard to overcome.

we were given a brain equal to our heart; you can no more serve two masters with your heart anymore than you cn ignore logical inconsistencies.

DO NOT be an apologist or accept the explanation «your mind is too small to understand the greatness of science» or «evolution moves in mysterious ways» when you come upon logical inconsistencies in your belief.

But the purpose of the hierarchy is precisely to formalize the process of abstraction used by historians, so that they can avoid the logical inconsistencies that often corrupt their narrative explanations and meet the criticism that has been (I think justly) leveled at them.

Thus, Wieman was convinced that in the matter of the empirical nature of this creative process, «We are discussing, not logical inconsistency, but life and death» (SHG 31),

All this does is try to make logical inconsistencies immune to criticism.

The whole silly story is completely marbled with logical inconsistencies.

i know you don't believe what i believe, so i was pointing out the logical inconsistency WITHIN your view of existence & such an articulation of compassion.

This simple concept is riddled with a plethora of logical inconsistencies.

The reason for this is that such a position can itself be held in good faith, as far as it goes: one can, without logical inconsistency, maintain that the laws of nature (if completely understood) do (or could) explain the phenomena studied in the sciences.

Once Niebuhr had arrived at and accepted the logical inconsistency of this multidimensional unity of man, he was remarkably consistent in maintaining the view.

DO NOT be an apologist or accept the explanation «your mind is too small to understand the greatness of God,» «God is outside the Universe» or «God moves in mysterious ways» when you come upon logical inconsistencies in your belief.

Incoherence and coherence are here clearly distinguished in concept from the contradictoriness or freedom from it which belong to logical inconsistency and consistency, even though an essential relationship of mutual conditionality governs both senses.

«Some critics,» he acknowledges, «have... presented the case against [traditional theism] as if a strictly logical inconsistency were the crux of the matter.»

Logical consistency (and even logical inconsistency) seem rather to be always grounded in a field of meanings and of meaning - relationships,

DO NOT be an apologist or accept the explanation «your mind is too small to understand the greatness of god» or «god moves in mysterious ways» when you come upon logical inconsistencies in your belief.

Unfortunately, the logical inconsistencies evident between these two works and indeed within the Christian faith itself will provide fodder for an eternal stalemate.

Why is it that Christians always try to hide behind the «hatred» mantre when forced to confront severe logical inconsistencies in their childish faith?

The theory of epochal time was formulated to avoid this logical inconsistency.

But I think we can say that this case is objectively weird, as highlighted by the many logical inconsistencies above.

Looper may have more logical inconsistencies than a Star Trek convention, but it's exciting, creatively stimulating, satisfying and, above all, unexpected.

It's a logical inconsistency that can not be overcome.

It would have been nice if the movie explored the logical inconsistency of essentially forcing a man into servitude in the name of freedom, but as much as the movie tries, there simply aren't any decent ideas here.

Sometimes when you're walking out of a movie and a friend starts to pick apart the logical inconsistencies, the dopey character motivations, or the unexplored plot tangents, it's tempting to just hold your finger to your lips and shush them.

The idea that Franco's prosecutor seems to hang his murder case on the logical inconsistency in the abbreviations of «lasagna» and «pizza» («You don't make nicknames based on how things are spelled, you make them based on how they sound!»)

As the body of national discipline research has grown, school systems around the country have started recognizing the logical inconsistency of pushing students who need to learn out of the schools that provide them an education.

Most line editors will point out technical errors or logical inconsistencies when they jump out, because they're trying to make your writing better, and editors tend to be perfectionists.

What I've seen with indie - published e-books is that they've taken the place of traditional «vanity» publishers, and as with the typical output of vanity publishers they're filled with typos, grammatical errors, logical inconsistencies, and other things that would have been caught by the editorial chain at a traditional publisher.

Try to find any logical inconsistencies or fallacies.

[July 15, 12:12 p.m. Updated There was a logical inconsistency in the way I initially wrote this sentence.

G&T managed to get their work out there; publishing it in Nature or Science would not have changed the fact that they're arguments just don't hold any water (they didn't do any new science, they just took what was already known, and then tried to use that to argue against what is already known — a search for logical inconsistency, which might have been worthwhile if they'd known what they were doing and if they'd gone after contrarian «theory»)-- unless it were edited, removing all the errors and non-sequitors, after which it would be no different than a physics book such as the kind a climate scientist would use...

Both the Libertarian party and the libertarian movement have taken on heavy baggage anathema to political minimalism, be it the whole racial subtext or the drug thing, or mainly the immense logical inconsistency and pseudointellectualism of the whole bunch.

Lord Monckton did not point out any intrinsic logical inconsistencies in the warmist theory.

Logical inconsistency, you can not say you want me to believe that and still say «my mind» and expect me to care.

Will you allow that program to analyze your own «tautologies, verbiage, words of purely emotional import, and logical inconsistencies» and censor you as well?

Who will program it, and decide what, exactly, count as «tautologies, verbiage, words of purely emotional import, and logical inconsistencies»?

But it is important to clearly distinguish the lines of disagreement, not base arguments on logical inconsistencies that don't exist.

The appearance given by such amusing, blatant logical inconsistency is that you haven't even decided on your narrative yet; you seem to be making it up as you go along.

However, when I'm asked to BELIEVE that the world is headed to a catastrophic warming due to the wrong - doings of us industrialized societies and that we need to do something now to stop the disasters, I'm faced with several problems: - More often than not, when I've tried to analyse the concrete evidence to support such claims I have found logical inconsistencies or severe uncertainties that you don't need to be an expert to perceive.

(4)-RSB- it is argued that for convective motions... Can you not see the logical inconsistency in your argument?

Can you not see the logical inconsistency in your argument?

You refer to my post with phrases like «logical inconsistency» and «the unlikeliness of that proposition» and state that you're trying to help.

There seems to be a logical inconsistency there.

so you just made a statement that contains no logical inconsistencies and which can not be falsified by empirical evidence.

Anyway, my experience with Judith and her fellow «skeptics» is that they will never feel that they have to concede a point — no matter if the answer to a particular question exposes a logical inconsistency — they will just spin and go about their merry way.

Of course there is room for disagreement but it is possible to step outside the boundaries of what can be substantiated, and it is possible to get known facts wrong (even if about opinions or fuzzy knowledge, one can get facts about those things wrong or ignore salient facts; one can also run into logical inconsistencies where at least one part must be wrong), and it is possible to refuse to correct one's self over and over.)

This article fails to discuss what could be called «logical inconsistency in arguments» relating to the datasets that are used to define the «Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation signal» and related effects on hurricane intenstity and frequency.

If this isn't a logical inconsistency, what is it?